Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Articles of Confederation to Constitution
Unit 1 – Foundations 1.4 to 1.6 Articles of Confederation to Constitution
2
Unit 1: Foundations of American Democracy
© AP Gov with LaMoney
3
Topic 1.4 Challenges of the Articles of Confederation
© AP Gov with LaMoney
5
Articles of Confederation
Established a very weak federal government Established a unicameral Congress in which each state had 1 vote No executive or judicial branch Each state was sovereign © AP Gov with LaMoney
6
Articles of Confederation
Congress could Declare war & make treaties Raise an army Coin Money Borrow money © AP Gov with LaMoney
7
Articles of Confederation
Congress could NOT Tax the states or people Regulate interstate commerce States could Impose tariffs on other states Create their own currencies Refuse to recognize federal treaties © AP Gov with LaMoney
8
Articles of Confederation Video
© AP Gov with LaMoney
9
Shays’ Rebellion Lack of centralized military power led to a slow response to put down the rebellion Showed the weakness of the federal government under the Articles of Confederation Caused more people to support a new Constitution & stronger central government © AP Gov with LaMoney
10
1. “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.” 2. “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” For each quote identify whether it more likely came from the Articles of Confederation or the Constitution. Explain your reasoning. The passages are similar, however the first allows states to have all powers not expressly delegated to the federal government, while the second omits the word expressly. Which of these do you think an anti-federalist would prefer? Why? © AP Gov with LaMoney
11
2012
12
Topic 1.5 Ratification of the U.S. Constitution
© AP Gov with LaMoney
14
Do you believe that elected representatives have an obligation to compromise when making important policy decisions? Is it better to be principled and refuse to negotiate & compromise, or is better to negotiate and compromise to get a policy made, even if that policy isn’t exactly what you want? © AP Gov with LaMoney
15
Constitutional Convention
Stated purpose: “for the sole and expressed purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation Political negotiation and compromise significantly impacted the development of the Constitution © AP Gov with LaMoney
16
Constitutional Convention
Virginia plan Bicameral legislature in which both houses are apportioned based on population Favored large states Stronger National Government New Jersey Plan Unicameral legislature in which all states are equal Favored Small states Merely wanted to amend Articles of Confederation © AP Gov with LaMoney
17
Great Compromise AKA Connecticut Compromise
Established a bicameral legislature House: Population; Senate: 2 per state © AP Gov with LaMoney
18
Grand Committee Negotiated the Great Compromise
Convinced the large states to agree to the bicameral legislature with equal representation in the Senate by requiring that all revenue bills originate in the House © AP Gov with LaMoney
19
Electoral College Compromise between those who wanted Congress to vote for the president and those who wanted citizens to directly elect the president © AP Gov with LaMoney
20
Read the excerpt from Federalist No. 68 and consider the following:
Do you think the Electoral College has accomplished what Hamilton said that it would? Alternative proposals for the selection of the president included Congress choosing the president, state governors choosing the president, Congress choosing a presidential council made up of multiple people, an election by the people, and a lifetime appointment for the president. Which, if any, of these proposals do you think would be best? For each of the above proposals, identify whether it better exemplifies participatory or elite democracy. © AP Gov with LaMoney
21
Three-fifths compromise
Each slave would count as 3/5 a person for the purpose of representation in the House of Representatives Why do you think that the three-fifths compromise was so important for getting Southern support for the Great Compromise and the Electoral College? Predict how the three-fifths compromise affected congressional representation. © AP Gov with LaMoney
22
Compromise on importation of slaves
Congress could not ban the importation of slaves for 20 years from the ratification of the Constitution Southern states agreed to end the importation of slaves after 20 years if northern states returned fugitive slaves © AP Gov with LaMoney
23
Amendment process Debates about self-government during the drafting of the Constitution led to the establishment of an amendment process. The Constitution can be amended by either: 2/3 vote in both Houses of Congress to propose & ¾ of state legislatures ratify 2/3 of the states request a national convention to propose & ¾ of state conventions ratify © AP Gov with LaMoney
24
Contemporary debates What is the proper role of the central government? What are the rightful powers of the state governments? What rights are retained by individuals? © AP Gov with LaMoney
25
The debate over the role of the central government, the powers of state governments, and the rights of individuals remains at the heart of present-day constitutional issues about democracy and governmental power, as represented by: Debates about government surveillance resulting from the federal government’s response to the 9/11 attacks The debate about the role of the federal government in public school education © AP Gov with LaMoney
26
2012
27
Topic 1.6 Principles of American Government
© AP Gov with LaMoney
29
Separation of powers Governmental powers are assigned to three different branches of government: Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Congressional powers: Make laws Power of the purse Declare war Executive powers: Enforce laws Make treaties Commander-in-Chief Grant pardons Judicial powers: Interpret laws Review decisions of state and lower federal courts © AP Gov with LaMoney
30
Checks & Balances Each branch is given the ability to block or influence actions of the other branches © AP Gov with LaMoney
31
Congressional checks Congress checks on the judiciary:
Alter the # of judges on the Court Change the jurisdiction of lower courts & the appellate jurisdiction of the S.C. Propose a constitutional amendment to override Court’s decision Pass legislation to limit the impact of a Court ruling Confirm judicial nominees (Senate only) Impeach federal judges Congressional checks on the president: Override presidential veto (2/3 both houses) Impeach the president Refuse to pass a bill the president wants Confirm presidential nominees (Senate only) Ratify a treaty (Senate only) © AP Gov with LaMoney
32
Executive checks Presidential checks on the Judiciary:
Nominate federal judges Ignore a Supreme Court ruling Presidential checks on Congress: Veto legislation © AP Gov with LaMoney
33
Judicial checks Judicial checks on Congress:
Declare federal laws unconstitutional Judicial checks on the president: Declare executive orders/presidential actions unconstitutional © AP Gov with LaMoney
34
From the AP Government Student Ultimate Review Packet
© AP Gov with LaMoney
35
Separation of powers & checks and balances
Prevents any one branch or person from obtaining too much power Provides multiple access points for stakeholders (citizens) and institutions to influence public policy Ensure that the people’s will is represented and freedom is preserved © AP Gov with LaMoney
36
Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
Congress passed the RFRA to limit the impact of an unpopular Supreme Court ruling, Employment Division v. Smith (1990) In Employment Division v. Smith, the Court ruled against allowing religious exemptions to state and federal laws To limit the impact of this ruling, the RFRA states that, “governments should not substantially burden religious exercise without compelling justification” Essentially this means that if a person claims that a government has infringed on their religious freedom that the government must prove that there is a compelling reason for doing so and that it has used the least restrictive means possible of accomplishing its purpose © AP Gov with LaMoney
37
Impeachment Congress can impeach the president for high crimes and misdemeanors The House of Representatives can impeach a president by a simple majority vote To be impeach means to be indicted, or charged The Senate holds the impeachment trial, it requires a 2/3 vote to remove the president (or federal judge) from office Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton were both impeached by the House and acquitted by the Senate. Articles of impeachment were being pursued against Richard Nixon, but he resigned before he could be impeached © AP Gov with LaMoney
38
Federalist No. 51 Separation of powers and checks and balances limit governmental power, control abuses by the majority, and protect minority rights © AP Gov with LaMoney
39
Federalist No. 51 Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lz1H4RWD2U
© AP Gov with LaMoney
40
2012
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.