Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Lecture 4 Basic concepts of behavioral decision making, prospect theory
2
Kahneman: Maps of Bounded Rationality
Summary in three slides
3
Bernoulli’s error ”The proposition that decision makers evaluate outcomes by the utility of final asset positions has been retained in economic analyses for almost 300 years.” –Kahneman Bernoulli’s theory was meant to be prescriptive and descriptive. But Kahneman argues it’s a bad description.
4
Concave Convex
5
Key takeaways Reference point Concave-convex
Everything is evaluated in comparison to a reference point Concave-convex Risk aversion for gains Risk seeking for losses Steeper for losses than gains
6
Who: Daniel Kahneman 2002 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics Developed Prospect Theory with Amos Tversky Extremely influential in heuristics & biases
8
More prospect theory
9
Prospect Theory Two phases:
(1) editing phase (2) evaluation phase The editing phase consists of a preliminary analysis of the offered prospects seeks to generate a simpler representation of these prospects application of several operations that transform the outcomes and probabilities associated with the offered prospects In the second phase, the edited prospects are evaluated and the prospect of highest value is chosen.
10
Operations of editing phase
Coding: Coding in terms of losses and gains from a reference point (usually the current asset position) Combination of probabilities with identical outcomes Segregation: if possible, segregate the riskless component from the risky one. For example (300,.8; 200,.2) is naturally decomposed into a sure gain of 200 and the risky prospect (100,.8) Cancellation: discarding of components shared by the offered prospects (isolation effect) Simplification: rounding, discarding of extremely unlikely outcomes Detection of dominance: rejection of dominated alternatives
11
Formation of reference points?
Applying for a job Current salary Salary in the position Your friends’ salary … Price of chocolate in the store? Suitable wine in a restaurant?
12
Editing phase In the coding phase, what reference point should be used? Formation of reference point Can the reference point change over time? Do we understand how? Note: Many anomalies of preference result from the editing of prospects. PT is a descriptive, not a prescriptive theory of choice!
13
Evaluation phase Consider simple prospects of the form (x,p;y,q). A prospect is regular, if it is neither strictly positive nor strictly negative. Otherwise it is not regular. If (x,p;y,q) is a regular prospect, then V(x,p;y,q)= Π(p)v(x) + Π(q)v(y), where v(0)=0, (0)=0, and (1)=1 For example: V(400,.25; -100,.75) = Π(.25)v(400) + Π(.75)v(-100)
14
Evaluation phase The evaluation of strictly positive and strictly negative prospects follows a different rule. such prospects are segregated into two components: the riskless component and the risky component (the actual additional gain or loss which is at stake) If (x,p;y,q) is not a regular prospect, i.e. is either strictly positive or negative, and x is the more extreme outcome V(x,p;y,q) = v(y) + Π(p)[v(x)-v(y)] For example V(400,.25; 100,.75) = v(100) + (.25)[v(400)-v(100)]
15
The pi function Low probabilities are overweighted Large probabilities are underweighted
16
Comparison of EU and PT Expected utility 𝒖 𝑨 = 𝒑 𝒊 𝒖( 𝒙 𝒊 ) 𝒑 𝒊 is probability of outcome 𝒊 𝒙 is the payoff of outcome 𝒊 𝒖 is the utility function Prospect theory 𝒖 𝑨 = 𝝅(𝒑 𝒊 ) 𝒖 𝒑𝒕 ( 𝒙 𝒊 −𝒓) where 𝝅 transforms probabilities 𝒓 is the reference point 𝒖 𝒑𝒕 is the PT utility function
17
Camerer: Prospect Theory in the Wild: Evidence from the Field
18
”[e]conomists often say they will incorporate more psychological ideas into economics if those ideas can parsimoniously accound for field data better than standard theories do.” –Colin Camerer Presents 10 cases where: Naturally occurring data (not lab experiments) Prospect theory explains them better than standard theory
19
The cases Equity premium puzzle Disposition effect Labor supply
Asymmetric price elasticities Insensitivity to bad news 6. Endowment effect 7. Favorite-longshot bias 8. End-of-the-day effect 9. State lotteries 10. Telephone wire insurance
20
Equity premium puzzle Most of our time, stock returns are 8% higher than bonds Why do people invest in bonds? -> risk aversion But this would imply {51 209} ~{50 000; } Benartzi & Thaler: equity premium puzzle explained if loss-aversion coefficient is 2.25 and the horizon is 1 year I.e. investors are myopic
21
Disposition effect People are much more likely to sell winning stocks
But rationally, only future changes matter This effect does not exist in December, when investors sell losers to avoid taxes Explained with loss aversion: people don’t want to lock-in their losses
22
Labor supply New York cab drivers work long on bad days, and work short hours on good days Optimal solution would be to do the exact reverse! Explained with 1-day targets and loss aversion
23
Asymmetric price elasticities
Loss aversion implies asymmetric elasticities Price increases are worse than price decreases Customers cut back more when increases happen, than what they increase when prices fall Exactly this effect has been found
24
Insensitivity to bad news
If you know pay will be cut next year, what do you do? EU implies you should cut consumption now But in fact, people do not do that Explained with loss aversion relative to reference point, and gambling on the pay cut not being so bad next year
25
Endowment effect Status quo bias: a change in offered healthcare plans in Harvard Older faculty decided often to continue with their current healthcare plan, even though they could have changed Defaults: PA/NJ had similar auto insurance, but different defaults This led to different choices of consumers! Endowment: Mug study Selling price of given mugs was 2-3 x buying price
26
Favorite-longshot bias
On the racetrack, longshot horses are bet on too much Bettors dislike the low return on favorites And they overweigh the small probability of a longshot win
27
End-of-the-day effect
At the end of the betting day, many bettors really prefer longshots This is because they are trying to get in the black And this is only possible with a longshot bet Explanation: reference points
28
State lotteries Lottery ticket purchases correlate strongly with main jackpot size, but not with probability of victory A rational player would take probability into account Explanation: overweighting low probabilities
29
Telephone wire insurance
Customers could either: Pay 60$ to repair wire damage Or Pay .45$ wire insurance / month Choosing B implies ridiculous risk aversion Explanation: Overweighting low probability
30
Conclusions Prospect theory can account for many observed ”anomalies” of decision behavior: via changing reference point (A house, B house) via form of the value functions (concave for gains, convex for losses – steeper for losses) via overweighting small probabilities
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.