Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Defense Readiness Reporting System – Strategic (DRRS-S)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Defense Readiness Reporting System – Strategic (DRRS-S)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Defense Readiness Reporting System – Strategic (DRRS-S)
Squadron/Detachment Course 01 September, 2019

2 Introduction This presentation covers the following topics:
DRRS-S Course Background Assessments Reporting Rules SORTS Reporting DRRS-S Accounts CNAF Readiness Brief Available Training Keys to Success

3 Background – How We Manage Readiness
GFM OPLAN/CONPLAN Joint Staff OPNAV N43 Overall Sponsor for Navy Readiness $FHP, $Ranges, $Ordnance OPNAV/Fleet FFC/CPF Allocates resources across TYCOMS Talking Point: Readiness reporting is a result of a balancing of requirements (GFM, MAP, ROC/POE, FRTP, T&R matrices) and resources (R+ month allocation via Current Readiness standards). MAP: Master Aviation Plan Commander, Naval Air Force schedule for all squadrons Produced to meet GFM requirements while supporting Force recapitalization (Type/Model/Series [T/M/S] transition plans) Future: Moving to a common, integrated NAE process to: Meet operational demand and recapitalization requirements Provide schedule transparency across the Enterprise Institutionalize resource responsiveness Evaluate collective fiscal requirements MAP CNAP/CNAL Sets R+months, allocates FHP, TAD Manages Aircraft maintenance TYCOM FRTP Training Events FRTP Profile resources T&R Matrixes C Entitlements Warfighters CSG/CVW/SQDN/DET requirements 3

4 Background – CVW Funding Profile (OFRP)
Example of a 27-month CVW profile. These profiles are notional; the MAP (Master Aviation Plan) is the planning tool. OFRP = Optimized Fleet Response Plan The chart shows on 27 months even though the OFRP is 36 months. Units will repeat months to stretch out the FRTP to a notional total of 36 months. Optimized Fleet Response Plan (OFRP) notional profile in use all CSGs During the post deployment sustain there is a requirement for a SUSTEX every 120 days which will require an increase in funding in the form of Afloat MESH During follow-on deployments funding will go back to 80%

5 Advanced POM 6 Month Deployment
Background – OFRP Timeline Carrier Strike Group (CSG) presence 36 month FRP – 1x7 month deployment Additional deployments or length of Sustain is CSG specific Maritime Patrol (VP) 18 month cycle – 1x6 month deployment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 VP Basic Advanced POM Month Deployment Per CNAP N7: FDNF has been dropped from the discussion and they will adhere to the C7F Training Plan. For the CVN and CVW, this is an annual plan repeated every year with CTF-70 Certification events every other year (VALIANT SHIELD). For HSC/HSM expeditionary players on CG/DDG's, they should be aligned to the CSG - they may deploy independently of the CSG, but they are supposed to train with them. For HSC/HSM on ARGs, they will follow the ARG O-FRP. VAQ is unchanged - have heard no discussion on this one. LCS is a separate animal and will continue to train on their own timeline. Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) 36 month cycle – 1x7 month deployment

6 Fleet Response Plan Profile Current Readiness Standard
Background – Current Readiness Standards Standards are published in CNAFINST 3510 (series) Instruction on the CNAF SHAREPOINT SITE Fleet Response Plan Profile Current Readiness Standard

7 Current Readiness Standard
Background – Current Readiness Standards Current Readiness Standard Daily AMSRR Data Current Readiness Standards Training hours and sim fidelity standards come from the reduced METL Training and Readiness matrices Driven by R+ month, the CR tables sets demand signal for: Aircraft on flight line Parts support Mission systems Aircrew Manning Fit/Fill SHARP

8 Background – Mission Essential Tasks
METs are tasks considered essential to accomplish and support missions and requirements assigned by a Joint or Naval Commander The Mission Essential Task List (METL) is based on the Unit’s ROC/POE and maps tasks to METs Each MET contains a set of conditions and standards The METL is common to all units within a Responsible Organization (RespOrg) Assessment of Mission Essential Tasks (METs) is the basis for the DRRS-S readiness system. Each unit type has a list of METs (Called a METL – Mission Essential Task List) which is based on Warfare Mission Areas in the approved ROC/POE. METs come from the UNTL (Universal Naval Task List) which is a common document to the Marine Corps, Navy and Coast Guard. The MET (also referred to as an NTA – Navy Tactical Level Task) is a task which contains conditions and standards. The NTA itself is unclassified. When conditions and standards are applied, the MET becomes classified. The METL is specific to a TMS and required mission sets. In some cases, a TMS may have more than one METL. The METL group is called a RespOrg (Responsible Organization). METLs are developed by the Type Wing and approved via the COC by US Fleet Forces Command. Examples The VFA community has specific METLs for FA-18C, VFA E/F, and VFC. The H-60S community also has several METLs due to the various mission sets (HSC EXP, HSC CVW, HSC NSW).

9 Background – DRRS-S DRRS-S is the tool that DoD organizations use to report readiness to all levels of the chain of command DRRS-S requires two assessments Mission (Standards, METs, and Core) SORTS Navy Policy Guidance NTRP USFFC/CPF CNAP/CNAL Notes: - SORTS – Status of Resources and Training - All references are on the CNAF Readiness Reference Tool

10 Point of Contact Enter or update the Point of Contact information 1 Access the POC data entry from the ESORTS tab and the Current Unit Status page 2 Unit Summary Details Unit Commander: Point of Contact: NIPR DSN: SIPR COMM: Add Unit Commander name and the POC for the DRRS-S assessment (normally OPS or AOPS Officer). DSN number format requires a 3 digit prefix (312-US) METL Preview SORTS Availability

11 Assessments – Mission Assessment Overview
The DRRS-S assessment contains the following steps Assess the MET Standards Assess the MET and provide MET comments Assess the Core and provide Core comments 1 2 3 Access the mission and Core assessments from the ESORTS tab on the DRRS-S main menu

12 Assessments – Mission Assessment
1 2 Core Assessment MET Assessments The default view for the Mission Assessment screen is the Overall view. This displays all assigned unit missions (Core in this case) and all assigned Mission Essential Tasks (METs) associated with the unit’s missions. Most units will have one Core mission. There is two ways to navigate to the MET page. 1. Use the drop down to select “CORE” 2. Click on the word “CORE”

13 Assessments – MET Assessment
Each MET needs to be assessed first before your Core Mission assessment can be submitted You can click anywhere on the MET line to edit and assess that specific MET

14 Assessments – MET Assessment
1 2 3 4 5 6 Each MET assessment requires the following actions Assess the MET standards (select “Update” when done) DRRS-S provides a calculated assessment based on the standard assessments Provide a current MET assessment (Y/Q/N) Provide an expected MET assessment (Y/Q/N) and anticipated change data Provide MET comments for assessments for MET assessed as Q or N Save or Approve the MET assessment when complete

15 Assessments – Standard Assessment
1 2 In the middle of the page you will see the standards sections 1. You are only required to complete the “Assessed Value” area as per the criterion stated in the standard 2. After updating the assessed value, click the “Update” button and the status will update for that standard Notes: 1. If there are no changes required for any of that MET’s standards, you can select the “Update All” button and proceed to the overall assessment of the MET 2. Do not assess the Observed Value and Date 3. You must update or change the standard before you can Save or Approve the MET assessment

16 Assessments – MET Assessment
All squadron METs have at least the following three standards Resource Standard Data Source Assessed value options Personnel Unit manned to fit/fill % standards as established by Manning Control Authority Fleet (MCAF) Directive 15-1 TYCOM Monthly FIT Report (TMFR) published by CNAP N13 Yes or No Yes- unit meets/exceeds the required FIT/FIL No – unit does not meet the required FIT/FIL Equipment Average monthly aircraft mission capable status reported by Aviation Management Supply and Readiness Reporting (AMSRR) per published deployment month thresholds in established TYCOM current readiness standards AMSRR and Current Readiness Standards Yes – unit meets/exceeds the average monthly MC rate No – unit does not meet the average monthly MC rate Training Aircrew proficiency as evaluated by TYCOM-approved training and readiness matrix to wing training manual performance standards. Training proficiency measured in terms of Training Figure of Merit (TFOM) per CNAP/CNALINST series SHARP CRA Numerical (TFOM value for the MET) The TFOM calculation is defined in CNAP/CNALINSTR A (T&R) in chapter 4.

17 Assessments – Commander’s Assessment
The following values are used to assess the Core and MET assessments: Display Value Description Yes (Green) The unit can successfully perform an assigned task to the prescribed standards and conditions. Qualified Yes (Yellow) The unit can accomplish all or most of the task to standard under most conditions. No (Red) The unit cannot perform an assigned task to the prescribed standards and conditions at this time. Not Assessed (striped) The task has not yet been assessed Draft Assessment (*) The assessment has been completed in draft awaiting final approval by the unit commander. Y Q N Q*

18 Assessments – General Guidance
The Commander’s assessment shall not be green for any MET if the unit fails to complete the full training requirements for any phase of the FRTP Always assess to the MCO standard and keep comments pointed and operationally focused “MCO ready” is defined as a unit’s ability to deliver its full design capability as delineated in the ROC/POE and should not be measured against the requirement of a specific OPLAN Unit Commanding Officers should not report “Y/Green” across the board just because a unit is “green” for its current FRTP phase Source: CNAP/CNALINST DRRS Supplemental Guidance

19 Assessments – Core Assessment
1 Source: CNAP/CNALINST DRRS Supplemental Guidance 1 Access the Core Assessment from the MET assessment page by clicking on the Core assessment

20 Assessments – Core Assessment
Start the Core assessment by clicking on the “Add New Assessment” link 1 Source: CNAP/CNALINST DRRS Supplemental Guidance 1

21 Assessments – Core Assessment - Draft
Complete the current and anticipated Y, Q, N assessments Complete the anticipated change date You can copy your existing comments or type new comments by selecting the resource area from the left selection box Save when complete. The save button just saves the draft Core assessment. 1 1 2 3 2 3 Source: CNAP/CNALINST DRRS Supplemental Guidance 4 4

22 Assessments – Commander’s Remarks
CO Comments must be structured to show the following Overall block CO summary of top readiness concerns (5-6 lines max) Issue, Impact, resolution Current FRTP month, next FRTP event Expected Deployment/RTHP date Write the details of your issues in the Personnel, Equipment, and Training blocks. R+5, Next FRTP event is TSTA (Jul 2019), expected deployment Jan 2020. Top CO concerns: Aircrew Manning Senior Maintenance personnel manning ACTC generation for newly arrived aircrew This goes in the CNAF Flag Readiness brief This provides us the details for talking points

23 Assessments – Core Assessment - Approve
Select “View METL Comments” to view the entire DRRS-S report and export to Word. The report includes assessments and remarks for CO review. The next view will have an Approve option. Select “Approve” when the Core assessment has been reviewed and approved by the unit commander. 1 2 Source: CNAP/CNALINST DRRS Supplemental Guidance 2

24 Assessments – Commander’s Remarks
Personnel Remarks Squadrons comment on shortages, TADs, and other issues that cause personnel shortages Detachments comment on losses/swap outs and the squadron’s plan to fill gaps Equipment Remarks Squadrons comment on long term aircraft maintenance issues and equipment shortages Detachments comment on shorter term NMC/PMC issues Your get well date in your comments drives your next DRRS-S update Training Remarks Use the SHARP 7.0 “Readiness Assessment (CRA)” report to explain your Ef issues Use the SHARP 7.0 “Crews” report to explain your Pf issues Detailed Pf data is not visible on SHARP (Web) when deployed so you must explain in comments General Remarks/Tips Use plain language; this is not a message, so use sentence case DRRS-S is about MCO capability and not what your unit is tasked with currently Do not use SORTS terminology in DRRS-S comments Don’t just write, “Readiness as per FRTP phase”

25 Assessments – Commander’s Remarks
The issues you comment on in DRRS-S change depending on your FRTP Phase Maintenance Aircraft availability to conduct ULT/ACTC generation Impact of aircraft on loan to NAWDC/TOP GUN/other squadrons or in Depot or MODs Single shift maintenance due to maintenance manning Predicting aircrew on board for ARP and AWF Basic Aircrew availability and training for ARP/AWF Managing aircraft MODs /aircraft availability for ARP/AWF/C2X Execution of ordnance Integrated/Advanced Finalizing aircrew training for C2X and turning “Green” Sustain/Deploy Degradations due to AOR restrictions on tactical flying Plan to maintain training while deployed Ability to retain and train aircrew for post deployment sustainment

26 Assessments – Good Sample Remarks
Overall: R+10. Next FRTP event: C2X in July. Deployment date: 15 October. CO’s top readiness concerns are aircrew manning, CPO manning, and completion of aircrew training during C2X. See comments below Personnel: FIT 78% / FILL 89%, AMEX 90%. #1 Personnel concern is aircrew and CPO manning: 15 of 17 Aircrew assigned. No aircrew gains expected prior to C2X. E7-E8 manning is 55% of required FIT. 5 of 9 E7 assigned causing the squadron barely maintain two shifts of maintenance over the next two months. Working with the Wing to get resolve our CPO manning and gain TAD aircrew. Equipment: Unable to make MC rate for R+10 due to critical parts shortages (maybe list high priority parts). Lack of MC aircraft has resulted in a loss of 10 sorties over the past two months. Training: All METs are capped at yellow until the completion of C2X in July. NTAs 1.2.1, 1.2.2, and are degraded for Self Escort Strike and Electronic Attack tasks. Expect these METs to change to GREEN after the completion of C2X at the end of July. We will conduct extra sorties post C2X to complete crews and attain green in METS and (expect completion by 5 August).

27 Assessments – Bad Sample Remarks
Overall: Integrated phase. The Fighting Tigers are ready for world-wide deployment and all combat tasking. Squadron is YELLOW overall. DRRS-S submitted due to change-of-command 12 June. Squadron shows REDs and YELLOWs in most METs, however, I will continue to assess the squadron as YELLOW overall. Expecting green in most areas after completion of C2X. CO Sends Personnel: FIT 78% / FILL 89%, AMEX 90%. Shortages in multiple rates. Equipment: BUNO in MOD, BUNOs and require extensive maintenance Training: Require more ordnance to complete aircrew qualifications prior to C2X. We will require a waiver for AGM-XX and BLU-YY. Unable to execute missile shoot.

28 Assessments – CVW/CSCW-1 units only
Under the reduced METL the old CARR no longer works thus CVW/CSCW-1 Staff reports under their staff UIC The staff can view each squadron’s assessment in DRRS-S but not as a group Squadrons can still submit their comments to the staff to inform the CAG/CSCW-1 comments The CAG/CSCW-1 comments still reflect the ability of the wing as a whole to perform their various missions

29 Reporting Rules - Frequency
Submit assessments in DRRS-S as follows: Within 24 hours of a significant change in readiness Within 30 days of the last assessment Following completion of major FRTP milestones to include TSTA, ARP, Air Wing Fallon, and C2X When otherwise directed Assessments must be submitted in DRRS-S within 24 hours of a significant change in readiness. An updated assessment must be submitted within 30 days of the last assessment, even if there is no change in readiness. Notes: (1) Your ISIC may also direct a DRRS-S assessment based on COCOM or Fleet Commander reporting requirement. (2) Submission not required for changes of command.

30 DRRS-S - Help Navy Readiness Support Center (NRSC)
Account servicing, Change permissions levels, technical issues Phone: (DSN 836) or For all readiness questions and even for help with technical issues, call your TYCOM N40 reps. To get a new DRRS-S Account Request an account at: OSD will only create accounts with "View only" permissions Call the Navy Readiness Support Center (USFF Help Desk) at to have your permission level upgraded to unit commander.

31 DRRS-S Account Permissions
DRRS-S URL (SIPRNET): The unit of assignment is the unit that you are allowed to edit Only five accounts per unit are allowed to have Unit Commander Permissions Account Type Description of Permission Level Unit Viewer Read-only access to ESORTS information. Has no ability to edit mission readiness tasks. This is the default role for all new DRRS-S users. Unit User Can view draft assessments in the Mission Assessment tool. Has the ability to edit mission readiness tasks that are directly assigned to their user account for their primary unit of assignment. Unit Commander Has final approval authority on the submission of the unit’s readiness report. Has read and write capabilities for the unit of assignment. This is the only permission level that can edit and submit data in the Navy SORTS Input Tool. DRRS-S account servicing is performed by the Navy Readiness Support Center (Help Desk) at USFF ( ) or 31

32 CNAF Readiness Brief - CVW

33 CNAF Readiness Brief - Non-CVW

34 Training Plan – Methods
Three avenues for DRRS-S training are: On-line and embedded training CNAF Readiness Reference Tool Help functions in DRRS-S Pipeline training PXO Course HSM/HSC OIC Course VR OPS Officer Conference CVW DRRS-S Training during the FRTP Waterfront briefs Fleet concentration sites – at least annually As requested by units

35 Keys to Success CO/OIC gets 100% of the vote in the Commander’s assessment The unit needs to understand their FRTP cycle and their readiness expectations Remarks should be focused on readiness issues for your squadron/detachment Comment on your current degraders and your plan to get healthy Ensure that all remark fields are continually updated, especially get well dates Concentrate your remarks in the Core Comment block Evaluate all METs, standards, Core, and NSIT on every assessment NSIT is a separate assessment that shall be consistent with your DRRS-S assessments Manage the data systems that provide resource data (AMSRR, SHARP, etc.) Accurate Flight logging in SHARP really matters Take advantage of the TYCOM and Type Wing experts

36 Contractor Support Leads
CNAF DRRS-S POCs CDR David “Lanezies” Lane DRRS-N Program Manager Mr. Timothy Leonard SHARP Program Manager Contractor Support Leads CNAL Support Mr. Chris Soler Mr. John Bryson CNAP Support Mr. Derek Teachout Mr. Dan Raphael DRRS-S Account servicing & Technical Support Navy Readiness Support Center (NRSC) U.S. Fleet Forces

37 QUESTIONS?


Download ppt "Defense Readiness Reporting System – Strategic (DRRS-S)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google