Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

VoiceXML An investigation Author: Mya Anderson

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "VoiceXML An investigation Author: Mya Anderson"— Presentation transcript:

1 VoiceXML An investigation Author: Mya Anderson
Supervisor: Prof. P Clayton

2 Introduction VoiceXML recap The problem area My approach
Some things I did… Findings,opinions and views Conclusion and questions

3 VoiceXML recap

4 VoiceXML = Voice Extensible Markup Language
XML-based Internet mark-up language 4 developing voice interfaces First version released 1999 Latest version released April 2002

5 Allows access to Web via telephones Works in Voice Browser
Provides standards-based interface for: Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) Text-to-Speech (TTS) Dual Tone Multi-Frequency (DTMF) Call handling Other technologies

6 The Problem Area

7 VoiceXML is a new technology Many promised benefits & advantages
Relatively little information available. Task Find out more Try establish whether it had any value

8 My approach

9 Step 1 Lots of reading! Web sites Text books Software manuals

10 Step 2 Try write a simple VoiceXML application Involved
Deciding on a development environment Picking a voice browser to interpret my VoiceXML pages Getting to grips with syntax Finding examples

11 Step 3 Try write a prototype for Rhodes Online Student Services (ROSS)
Help determine Ease of development Speed of development VoiceXML capabilities

12 Development environments
Four potential environments: Hosted Web-based Simulated “Real”

13 Hosted Use Voice Service Provider Telephone access
No need to worry about hardware issues Tools sometimes provided

14 Web-based “Integrated Development Environment” Many tools offered
Provides most current support Best option, if available Best way to start Not available in SA

15 Simulated Stand-alone browser runs on PC
Use headset or speaker and microphone Good for initial development Available browsers bit behind current standards Can’t test “real” input i.e. phone

16 “Real” Set up on gateway Expensive
Requires hardware and telephony expertise

17 Selected environment Stand-alone Cheapest Browsers freely available
No SA-based Voice Service Providers for a web-based environment (preferable) No need to set up gateway

18 Some things I did…

19 Started ROSS prototype
Input & output student number Terminated by software issues Experimented with mixed-initiative dialogs Traditional IVR (e.g. cell-phones) = directed dialog Mixed-initiative dialogs “intelligent”

20 Used inline & external grammars Wrote JGSF grammar
JGSF (Java Speech Grammar Format) GSL (Grammar Specification Language) SRGF (Speech Recognition Grammar Format) Did some basic scripting

21 Findings, Opinions and Views

22 Speech recognition is still VERY sensitive to background noise and loudness of speech
VoiceXML (as a language) is relatively easy to use VoiceXML integrates very well into existing web infrastructures Standalone browsers are behind in what they are able to support

23 Very little technical assistance is available
Standalone browsers are still quite “buggy” Documentation is limited Voice technologies (TTS, ASR) still not good enough Audio files VoiceXML applications are being used commercially in the USA & Europe

24 VoiceXML offers major advantages and cost savings for developing IVRs
Smaller developer learning curve Able to generate pages dynamically Uses much of the web infrastructure already in place for normal web pages

25 HCI issues are VERY important when developing voice applications
Badly designed VUI will simply NOT be used.

26 Other Issues Possible threats Poor voice technologies
SALT (Speech Application Language Tags) New language combining voice & data technologies

27 Standards still not established/comprehensive enough
Some issues still left to the developers’ discretion Certain companies implement proprietary solutions to problems resulting in platform and/or browser dependence

28 Conclusion

29 VoiceXML has much potential
Highly dependent on underlying technologies Standardisation still in progress Reduces portability Inc risk (e.g. grammars, rewriting)

30 Already better than existing IVR development technologies
Flexible Easier to learn Easier to write & modify Many potential future benefits Here to stay? Too early to tell Highly dependent on external “ifs”

31 THANK YOU! Any Questions???


Download ppt "VoiceXML An investigation Author: Mya Anderson"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google