Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Building a “System” Moving from writing a program to building a system. What’s the difference?! Complexity, size, complexity, size ------ complexity Breadth.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Building a “System” Moving from writing a program to building a system. What’s the difference?! Complexity, size, complexity, size ------ complexity Breadth."— Presentation transcript:

1 Building a “System” Moving from writing a program to building a system. What’s the difference?! Complexity, size, complexity, size complexity Breadth of complexity Depth of complexity

2 Increase of Complexity Everywhere
Solution Problem transformation Increase in size & complexity Increase in size & complexity Increase in size & complexity

3 Complexity (Breadth) More Functionalities
More Features within each functionality More varieties of Interfaces (internal & external) More Users and varieties of users More data, varieties of data, data structures

4 Complexity (Depth) More Linkages and Connections
Data sharing among the functionalities Control Passing among functionalities

5 Examples for in-class Discussion
Assignment compute and show the “average” of the read-in numbers “Modified” Assignment show the largest and the smallest of the read-in numbers Where is the complexity? “Further Modified” Assignment show the read-in numbers in a sorted ascending order.

6 Handling Complexities (A)
Via “Simplification” Decomposition of the problem and of the solution Modularization of solution Separation of Concerns of problem and of solution Incrementally resolve problems *** Not “advertised” but a sometimes used technique is: REDUCE the problem

7 Handling Complexities (B)
Via “Improving Technology and Tools” Database to handle information and structures of information Programming & Dev. Platforms Computing Network Multi-Developer Configuration Management Modeling techniques of problem and solution Automated Testing

8 Handling Complexities (C)
Via “Improving Process and Methodologies” Coordinate multiple and different people performing different tasks Guidance for overlapping incremental tasks Guidance for measuring separate artifacts and outcomes

9 Example of Size and Complexity Increases
(b) Increased Size and Complexity (a) Simple Start Start Wait for signal Perform task A Signal is? Perform task B ‘a’ other ‘b’ Perform task A Perform task C Perform task C Perform task A2 Perform task B Stop Stop Example of Size and Complexity Increases

10 Task Breakdown Example (Handling Complexity)
Requirements Definition Support & Problem Fixes Code/Unit Test Design Integration & System Test 1. Who performs what task? 2. How is the task completed with what technique or tool? 3. When should which task start and end? 4. Who should coordinate the people and the tasks?

11 Iterative Process Example (Handling Complexity)
Understanding the Broad Problem (Req.) Architecture and High Level Design Specific Requirements Specific Requirements Detail design Detail design Code Code Integration Test / Fix Test / Fix

12 Handling the “Details” separately
Integration Test / Fix Test / Fix Seemingly “simple” Test/Fix and Integrate steps: Should there be separate & independent test group? How should problem be reported and to whom? How much information must accompany a problem report? Who decides on the priority of the problem? How is the problem fix returned? Should all problems be fixed? What should we do with non-fixed problem? How are fixes integrated back to the system?

13 Some ‘Non-technical’ Considerations for Developing & Supporting a System
Effort & Schedule Expansion How does one estimate and handle this? Assignment and Communications Expansion? Do we need some process? Do we need some tools?

14 With the increase in system complexity, there is a corresponding
increase in the “manpower” or human resources. 2 people: 1 path 4 people: possibly 6 paths 6 people: increase to potentially 15 paths For n people, number of potential communications paths = ∑ (n-1) = [nx(n-1)] / 2 Increase in Amount of Communications as # of People Increases. Also, an increase in the number of communications errors committed

15 A Large, Complex System Building “Mission critical” or “Business critical” system (e.g. payroll - in textbook) requires (1)several separate activities performed by (2)more than 1 person (e.g. 50 ~ 100): Requirements: gathering, analysis, specification, and agreement Design: abstraction, decomposition, cohesion, interaction and coupling analysis Implementation: coding and unit testing Integration and tracking of pieces and parts Separate testing: functional testing, component testing, system testing, and performance testing Packaging and releasing the system

16 Also, Need to ‘Support’ the “Payroll” System (for real production)
Pre-release: preparation for education & support: Number of expected users Number of “known problems” and expected quality Amount of user and support personnel training number of fix and maintenance cycle Post-release: preparation for user and customer support: Call center and problem resolutions Major problem fixes and code changes Functional modifications and enhancements

17 Coordination Efforts Required in Systems Development and Support
Because there are i) more parts, ii) more developers and iii) more users to consider in “Large Systems” than a single program developed by a single person for a limited number of users, there is the need for Coordination of: Processes and methodologies to be used Final product and intermediate artifacts People (developers, support personnel, and users) The previous diagram on people increase and potential communication paths increase provides a clue to the importance of coordination efforts.


Download ppt "Building a “System” Moving from writing a program to building a system. What’s the difference?! Complexity, size, complexity, size ------ complexity Breadth."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google