1. Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: TG10 (L2R) Opening & Closing Report for September 2016
Date Submitted: September 2016
Source: Clint Powell, Powell Wireless Commsulting, LLC
Contact: Clint Powell, Powell Wireless Commsulting, LLC
Voice: ,
Re: TG10 (L2R) Opening & Closing Report for September 2016
Abstract: Opening & Closing Report for the TG10 (L2R) Sessions in Warsaw
Purpose: Layer 2 (Mesh Under) Routing
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P
Page 1

2. TG10 OPENING REPORT Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10
----- Meeting Notes (17/01/ :38) -----
Replace 1st paragraph with context for TVWS
Page 2

3. Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG10 (L2R)
Project:
Draft a recommended practice for Layer 2 Routing of Dynamically Changing Mesh Networks.
Leadership:
Chair – Clint Powell
Technical Editor – Verotiana Rabarijaona
Secretary – Charlie Perkins
----- Meeting Notes (17/01/ :38) -----
Replace 1st paragraph with context for TVWS
Page 3

4. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy.
Participants [Note: Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws sub-clause 6.2]:
“Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents
“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)
The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group
Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged
No duty to perform a patent search

5. Patent Related Links
All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development.
Patent Policy is stated in these sources:
IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws
IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual
Material about the patent policy is available at
If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit
This slide set is available at

6. Call for Potentially Essential Patents
If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance:
Either speak up now or
Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or
Cause an LOA to be submitted

7. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.
Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.
Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.
Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.
Technical considerations remain primary focus
Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets.
Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.
Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object.
See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.

8. Meeting Goals Recap July 802.15 Plenary and Current Status
07/12/10
Meeting Goals
Recap July Plenary and Current Status
Agenda and Mins. Approval
Review Scope
Review SB Recirc #1 Results
Comment Resolution
Re-Establish TG10 BRC
Prepare WG Motion for Conditional Approval to Proceed to RevCom
Review & Update Timeline
Next Steps
Page 8

9. Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG10 Scope
Scope
This recommended practice identifies protocols that route packets in a dynamically changing network (changes on the
order of a minute time frame), with minimal impact to route handling. The result is an extension of the area of coverage as the number of nodes
increase.
Page 9

10. TG10 SB Recirc. #1 Results RESPONSE RATE
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG10 SB Recirc. #1 Results
RESPONSE RATE
111 eligible people in this ballot group.
85 votes received = 76% returned (meets 75% min. return rate)
76 affirmative votes
3 total negative votes with comments
1 negative votes with new comments
0 negative votes without comments
6 abstention votes: (Lack of time: 5, Other: 1)
APPROVAL RATE
The 75% affirmation requirement is being met.
3 negative votes with comments
 79 votes = 96% affirmative
COMMENTS
Rogue
Page 10

11. TG10 CLOSING REPORT Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10
----- Meeting Notes (17/01/ :38) -----
Replace 1st paragraph with context for TVWS
Page 11

12. Meeting Status Recap July 802.15 Plenary and Current Status
07/12/10
Meeting Status
Recap July Plenary and Current Status
Agenda and Mins. Approval
Review Scope
Review SB Recirc. #1 Results
Comment Resolution
Re-Establish TG10 BRC
Prepare WG Motion for Conditional Approval to Proceed to RevC
Review & Update Timeline
Next Steps
Page 12

13. SB Recirculation #1 Comment Resolution Status
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
SB Recirculation #1 Comment Resolution Status
TOTAL # OF COMMENTS
# SB COMMENTS 39
# TECHNICAL
# EDITORIAL/OTHER
Resolved
Rogue
Resolved
100% Resolved
Page 13

14. Minutes & Comment Database
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
Minutes & Comment Database
Minutes - doc. #
Comment Database - doc. #
Page 14

15. TG10 Timeline (start dates)
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG10 Timeline (start dates)
1st Sponsor Ballot Recirc. Aug. 2016
2nd Sponsor Ballot Recirc. Sept. 2016
3rd Sponsor Ballot Recirc.* Oct. 2016
EC Approval Oct. 2016
RevCom Approval Dec. 2016
* If needed
Page 15

16. Looking Forward Between Now and San Antonio Mtg. in Nov.
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
Looking Forward
Between Now and San Antonio Mtg. in Nov.
2nd Sponsor Ballot Recirc.
2nd Sponsor Ballot Recirc. Comment Resolution
3rd Sponsor Ballot Recirc. (if needed)
Seek Conditional Approval from EC to submit to RevCom
At San Antonio Mtg. in Nov.
TBD
Page 16

17. Looking Forward (cont’d.)
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
Looking Forward (cont’d.)
After San Antonio Mtg.
Seek RevCom Approval
Next Update to 802.1
Nov. 2016
Page 17

18. TG10 Motion 1 Motion for TG Approval to Form a TG10 BRC.
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG10 Motion 1
Motion for TG Approval to Form a TG10 BRC.
Move that TG10 request that the WG approve the formation of a Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) for the Sponsor Balloting of the TG10 draft recommended practice with the following membership: Clint Powell, Verotiana Rabarijaona, Fumihide Kojima, Noriyuki Sato, Kiyoshi Fukui, Soo-Young Chang, Jaehwan Kim, SangSung Choi, Charlie Perkins. The TG10 BRC is authorized to approve comment resolutions and to approve the start of recirculation ballots of the TG10 draft on behalf of the WG. Comment resolution on recirculation ballots between sessions will be conducted via reflector and via teleconferences announced to the reflector as per the LMSC 802 WG P&P.
Moved: Verotiana Rabarijaona Second: Charlie Perkins
Discussion: None
Objections: None
Page 18

19. Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG10 Motion 2
Motion for WG to Seek Conditional Approval from EC to move to RevCom.
Motion: TG410 requests that WG review and approve the CSD [ ] and requests conditional approval from the EC to submit P /D08 (or current revision) to RevCom.
Moved: Verotiana Rabarijaona Second: Charlie Perkins
Discussion: None
Objections: None
Page 19

20. TG10 Conference Calls Reminder
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG10 Conference Calls Reminder
TG10 Standing Conference Call Info
Day: Mon.
Time: 6PM-8PM Mon. (Arizona) AM-Noon Tues. (Japan-JST, Korea)
Conf. #: To Be Sent to TG10 Reflector
Next Call: Mon. 19th, Sept.
Tues. (Japan-JST, Korea)
Page 20

21. TG10 Motion 1 to WG Motion for WG Approval to Form TG10 BRC.
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG10 Motion 1 to WG
Motion for WG Approval to Form TG10 BRC.
Move that WG approve the formation of a Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) for the Sponsor Balloting of the TG10 draft recommended practice with the following membership: Clint Powell, Verotiana Rabarijaona, Fumihide Kojima, Noriyuki Sato, Kiyoshi Fukui, Soo-Young Chang, Jaehwan Kim, SangSung Choi, Charlie Perkins. The TG10 BRC is authorized to approve comment resolutions and to approve the start of recirculation ballots of the TG10 draft on behalf of the WG. Comment resolution on recirculation ballots between sessions will be conducted via reflector and via teleconferences announced to the reflector as per the LMSC 802 WG P&P.
Moved: Clint Powell Second:
Discussion:
Objections:
Page 21

22. TG10 SB History SB SB Reicrc. #1 VOTERS 111 VOTED 84 85 YES 76 ABSTAIN
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG10 SB History SB
SB Reicrc. #1
VOTERS
111
VOTED 84 85
YES 76
ABSTAIN 5 6 NO 3
% VOTERS
75%
76%
% YES
96%
% ABSTAIN 5% 7%
COMMENTS
136
Rogue
Page 22

23. TG10 SB Status & Expectations
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG10 SB Status & Expectations
The 2nd Sponsor Ballot recirculation is set to start by Sat., Sept. 20th, and close by Fri., Sept. 30th.
Based on the convergence of the # of comments from the initial Sponsor Ballot to the 1st Sponsor Ballot Recirculation very few comments (if any) are expected on the 2nd Sponsor Ballot Recirculation. With that TG10 expects to be able to resolve any comments and start a 3rd recirculation of the Sponsor Ballot by the Oct. 14th (if needed).
Furthermore, if for whatever reason a 3rd Sponsor Ballot Recirculation is needed, TG10 anticipates that no further comments would be made on the draft during the recirculation.
Page 23

24. Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG10 Motion 2 to WG
Motion for WG to Seek Conditional Approval from EC to move to RevCom.
Motion: that WG reviewed and approves the CSD [ ] and requests conditional approval from the EC to submit P /D08 (or current revision) to RevCom.
Moved: Clint Powell Second:
Discussion:
Objections:
Page 24