1. Financial Conglomerates: What we know and do not Gianni De Nicoló IMF Research Department
10/20/2019

2. Overview Some facts Potential drivers of conglomeration Evidence
Policy Implications
10/20/2019

3. Some Facts
Conglomerate: a financial firm active in at least 2 business lines (banking, insurance, asset management)
Conglomeration is pervasive, especially in emerging markets and developing economies
However, some “de-conglomeration” has occurred recently, especially in developed economies (focus versus diversification)
10/20/2019

4. Facts (cont.)
Conglomeration among the largest 500 firms worldwide increased between 1995 and 2000 both in terms of number of firms and assets held
About 87 percent of conglomerates are led by banks
The trend in conglomeration appears global (industrialized and emerging market countries).
10/20/2019

5. What are the drivers of conglomeration?
Exploit “synergies” and diversification
Increase market power
Managerial “hubris” and other agency costs
Moral-hazard related expansion of safety net subsidies (e.g. To Big to-Fail, to-Discipline, to- Monitor-Effectively, etc.)
10/20/2019

6. Synergies Economies of scale/scope Information sharing
Revenue economies of scope: cross-selling
Cost economies of scope
BUT, there may be managerial diseconomies of scale/scope, firms may become too large/complex to manage
10/20/2019

7. Evidence on “synergies”
The evidence on economies of scope is at best mixed
No clear cost or revenue advantages on average.
Among the top global financial services providers as of end-2002, the largest firms were not necessarily those with the highest market value
10/20/2019

8. Conglomeration discount?
The market value of the whole is lower than that of its components: the difference is the “discount”
Studies that finds it and study that do not (mainly for the U.S.)
Nobody seems to find a conglomeration premium.
10/20/2019

9. Market power? Difficult to measure
Some business segments are highly concentrated (investment banking, asset management....)
Evidence is scant
Research needed
10/20/2019

10. Diversification and risk-taking incentives
Conglomerates should attain lower variability of returns vs. specialized firms
“Simulation” studies showed potential diversification benefits through mergers among different services (banking, insurance, asset management, etc.)
Results: some mergers might reduce risk, some might not
10/20/2019

11. Financial Risk
Product diversification and efficiency gains may allow firms to attain LOWER RISK PROFILES
Extension of safety-net to non-bank activities may allow firms to choose HIGHER RISK PROFILES
What are the NET EFFECTS? I carried out a simple regression analysis
10/20/2019

12. Questions
Do large financial firms exhibit levels of failure risk lower than small firms? NO
Does failure risk of conglomerate and non-conglomerate firms differ?
YES, (LARGE) CONGLOMERATES APPEAR TO BE AT LEAST AS RISKY AS OR RISKIER THAN SPECIALIZED FIRMS
10/20/2019

13. Cross-sectional regressions
Dependent variables:
Z-score (a proxy measure of failure risk)
Z components: ROA, E/A and ROA volatility
Regressors:
Conglomerate dummy
Size of conglomerates and non-conglomerates
Other controls
10/20/2019

14. Table 2: Regression Results on Risk, Size and Conglomeration 1/

15. Implication
The incentives for firms to take on more risk appear to have offset the risk reductions allowed by either scale and scope economies or geographic and product diversification
10/20/2019

16. Other issues Conflict of interest?
Large foreign intermediaries in (smaller) financial systems have beneficial effects
BUT, are there risks of “over-dependence” (credit flows) ?
Large conglomerate housed in “small” countries: could they be rescued?
10/20/2019

17. Summing up Benefits of synergies hard to detect on average
Risk profiles do not appear smaller than those of specialized firms
We do not know enough about market power effects of conglomerates
More research needed, especially for emerging and developing economies
10/20/2019

18. Policy responses
Choose the supervisory architecture that maximizes monitoring capacity
Choose the regulatory architecture that minimizes regulatory arbitrage and the extension of safety net subsidies
To what extent international conglomeration implies “conglomeration” of supervision?
10/20/2019

19. References
Amel, D., Barnes, C., Panetta, F. and Salleo, C. , 2004, “Consolidation and Efficiency in the Financial Sector: A Review of the International Evidence,” Journal of Banking and Finance.
Bank for International Settlements, 2001, The Banking Industry in the Emerging Market Economies: Competition, Consolidation, and Systemic Stability, BIS Papers, number 4, August.
De Nicoló, G., P.Bartholomew, J. Zaman, and M.Zephirin, 2004, Bank consolidation, conglomeration and internationalization: Trends and implications for financial risk, Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments.
Group of Ten, 2001, Report on Consolidation in the Financial Sector, (January), Bank for International Settlements: Basel, Switzerland.
Litan, R. and Herring, R. (Editors), 2003, Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, focusing on Financial Conglomerates.
10/20/2019