Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "University of Wisconsin-Madison"— Presentation transcript:

1 University of Wisconsin-Madison
The Angular Distribution of Atmospheric Muons in the AMANDA detector at a depth of 1730m Karen R. Bland Summer REU 2002 University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI

2 Overview Introduction to AMANDA Atmospheric muons Analysis Results
Some conclusions Future studies

3 Antarctic Muon and Neutrino Detector Array

4 Atmospheric Muons Produced by cosmic rays hitting atmosphere
Background to neutrino analysis

5 Analysis Monte Carlo (MC) Same analysis is performed on MC and data:
Simulation codes: Corsika, Corama, MMC, Amasim Data AMANDA-II (year 2000) data ~ 13,000 sec of lifetime (3.5 hrs) Same analysis is performed on MC and data: Hit cleaning Filtering Quality cuts

6 Quality Cuts Optimizing Removing mis-reconstructed events
Angular resolution Data/MC response Stability

7 Cuts (cont’d) Cuts: Passing rates: MC: 62.5% Data: 56.0%
Length of direct hits >120 m Track smoothness between –0.26 and +0.26 The time-likelihood fit reconstruction < 7.8 Passing rates: MC: 62.5% Data: 56.0%

8 Unfolding the detector data
MC true zenith angle reconstructed zenith angle Data reconstructed zenith angle

9 Results: Angular Distribution
Angular Distribution of Downgoing Muons at 1730 m Angular Distribution of Downgoing Muons at 1730 m S. Klimushin curve Data fit – 85 % MC fit – 68 % S.I. Sinegovsky curve Data fit – 73 % MC fit – 59 %

10 Results: Angular Distribution / Depth-Intensity
Slant Depth Intensity of Down-going Muons Angular Distribution of Downgoing Muons at 1730 m

11 Results: MC-Data Response / Effective Area

12 Some conclusions Atmospheric muon flux in AMANDA-II
MC-data deviation: ~ 7.5% There is a systematic effect around 30 degrees from vertical Horizontal resolution is still poor

13 Other things to look at…
Other ice models Different depths Different times of the year Energy threshold dependence Vertical depth intensity Comparisons with other groups

14 Acknowledgments Dr. Paolo Desiati Dr. Albrecht Karle
The UW-Madison AMANDA group The AMANDA collaboration Dr. Bob Benjamin The astrophysics REU group National Science Foundation

15

16 Dependence on energy: MC, E = 50 GeV Data, E = 50 GeV MC, E = 25 GeV

17 AMANDA and Cherenkov light


Download ppt "University of Wisconsin-Madison"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google