Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Bluebook 101: Introductory Signals

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Bluebook 101: Introductory Signals"— Presentation transcript:

1 Bluebook 101: Introductory Signals
(for briefs and memoranda, see R. B1.2) Gallagher Law Library, Oct

2 If signals baffle you, you aren’t alone.
The rules on signals are “a virtually cryptographic code.”1 1. FREDERICK WIENER, BRIEFING AND ARGUING FEDERAL APPEALS 223 (1961) Gallagher Law Library, Oct

3 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
The rules on signals “more than all the others combined, have contributed to the Blue Book’s notoriety.”2 They “are back in all their glorious inscrutability.”3 2. Peter Lushing, Book Review, 67 COLUM. L. REV. 599, 601 (1967) (reviewing A UNIFORM SYSTEM OF CITATION (1967)). 3. Id. Gallagher Law Library, Oct

4 What is an introductory signal?
It’s a concise way of alerting the reader to what you think you’re doing with the citation that follows. For instance, E.g. is a quick way to say: “I’m citing one or two sources but there are a bunch I could cite.” Contra is a quick way to say: “I know that this source is on the other side of what I just said.” Gallagher Law Library, Oct

5 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
[No signal] No signal at all means: what I’m citing clearly supports or identifies what I just said. Use no signal when citing something that directly supports the text the source of a quotation something referred to in the text Gallagher Law Library, Oct

6 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
E.g., E.g. (L. exempli gratia) means “for example.” What you’re citing supports what you said, but there are other authorities too. Can be combined with other signals (“But see, e.g., …”) Note: the comma after E.g. is not italicized. Gallagher Law Library, Oct

7 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
Example Washington law restricts teenagers from many activities.4 4. E.g., WASH. REV. CODE § (1) (2006) (limiting marriage to people 18 and older); WASH. REV. CODE § (2006) (limiting purchase of tobacco). Gallagher Law Library, Oct

8 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
Accord Accord means “I just cited something that supports my proposition, and now here’s another thing that supports it too.” You can also use Accord when you want to cite another jurisdiction. Gallagher Law Library, Oct

9 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
Example Many people perceive that rich people don’t pay their share of taxes. As Peter De Vries quipped, “The Rich aren’t like us -- they pay less taxes.”5 5. Mark Shields, Editorial, Anger About Privilege, WASH. POST, July 30, 1989 (quoting De Vries). Accord id. (quoting Leona Helmsley: “Only the little people pay taxes.”) Gallagher Law Library, Oct

10 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
See See means you’re citing something that clearly supports what you just said. It’s just a hair less direct than [No signal]. Gallagher Law Library, Oct

11 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
Example The Human Rights Committee was created by the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.6 6. See THOMAS BUERGENTHAL, DINAH SHELTON & DAVID P. STEWART, INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS IN A NUTSHELL 49 (3d ed. 2002). Gallagher Law Library, Oct

12 Signals as verbs: Example
See WILLIAM L. DWYER, IPSE DIXIT: HOW THE WORLD LOOKS TO A FEDERAL JUDGE (2007). For an insightful and charming collection of speeches by a UW alumnus, see WILLIAM L. DWYER, IPSE DIXIT: HOW THE WORLD LOOKS TO A FEDERAL JUDGE (2007). Gallagher Law Library, Oct

13 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
See also Use see also when you have already cited something that directly supports you and you want to add more. A parenthetical explaining the source’s relevance is encouraged. Gallagher Law Library, Oct

14 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
Example If children let others into their home while their parents are gone, crazy things can happen.7 7. See DR. SEUSS, THE CAT IN THE HAT (1957). See also RISKY BUSINESS (Geffen Film Co. 1983) (teenager bringing others into home while parents away). Gallagher Law Library, Oct

15 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
Cf. Cf. is the abbreviation for “confer,” Latin for “compare.” Use when cited authority doesn’t exactly support what you just said, but it’s close enough to lend support. An explanatory parenthetical is strongly recommended. Gallagher Law Library, Oct

16 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
Example The fairy tale wolf eats people.8 8. See JACOB GRIMM & WILHELM GRIMM, Little Red Riding Hood, in GRIMMS’ FAIRY TALES 100 (1812). Cf. THE THREE LITTLE PIGS (United Artists 1933) (wolf blowing down houses, presumably with intent to eat anthropomorphized pigs). Gallagher Law Library, Oct

17 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
Compare … with … This signal is what it sounds like -- you’re comparing one case (or article or statute) with another. To help the reader figure out why you’re comparing this and that, include parentheticals. Gallagher Law Library, Oct

18 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
Negative Signals If the source supports the proposition, use: If it doesn’t, use: [no signal] Contra See But see Cf. But cf. Gallagher Law Library, Oct

19 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
See generally Use for background material. Parentheticals are encouraged. Gallagher Law Library, Oct

20 Gallagher Law Library, Oct. 2017 http://lib.law.washington.edu
Order of Signals Multiple signals in one footnote: [no signal], e.g., accord, see, see also, cf., compare … with, contra, but see, but cf., see generally. Start with the strongest, most direct support, then negative, then general. Gallagher Law Library, Oct

21 Order within each signal
If one authority is “considerably more helpful or authoritative,” lead with it. Otherwise, read the lists in R. 1.4. This rule is long, but it only comes up with string cites. It’s just a way to bring order to long, messy footnotes. Gallagher Law Library, Oct


Download ppt "Bluebook 101: Introductory Signals"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google