Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Sorting out chest pain in the office setting

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Sorting out chest pain in the office setting"— Presentation transcript:

1 Sorting out chest pain in the office setting
Anthony J. Viera, MD, MPH, FAHA Professor and Chair

2 Primary objectives Discuss the common causes of CP and incorporate epidemiology of CP into development of differential diagnosis Present an approach to evaluation of CP in the office setting Use principles of clinical epidemiology to understand when a stress test is and is not going to be helpful in evaluation of CP

3 Epidemiology of chest pain in family medicine settings
Musculoskeletal 36 % 19 % Gastrointestinal 16 % “Nonspecific” 11 % Stable angina “Psychosocial” 7 % 5 % Pulmonary 4 % Non-ischemic cardiac Acute cardiac ischemia 2 %

4 The biggies 54 Acute coronary syndrome (AMI, USA)
Pulmonary embolus (history, Wells) Aortic emergency In the ER setting, ___% of CP is due to serious cardiovascular etiology (AMI, USA, PE, CHF) 54

5 Other causes Pericarditis Arrhythmia Valve disease Pneumonia
Pneumothorax Neoplasm Others?

6 Approach First order of business
Assess for any acute life, threatening condition or other serious cardiovascular etiology Rapid history, exam (VS, overall appearance, heart & lungs) +/- ECG If one of the “biggies” is a legitimate consideration, then needs to be evaluated in the emergency department

7 Rational clinical exam…
Which of the following has the strongest association with acute myocardial infarction? Pain radiating down left arm Pain radiating down right arm Pain radiating down both arms

8 Rational clinical exam…
Which of the following has the strongest association with acute myocardial infarction? Pain radiating down left arm LR+ 2.3 Pain radiating down right arm LR+ 2.9 Pain radiating down both arms LR+ 7.1

9 Steps 1 & 2 History Electrocardiogram Acute MI? Acute ischemia?

10 46 y/o man with chest pain now
Sinus bradycardia ST & T wave abnormalities suggesting myocardial injury 1

11 58 y/o man with epigastric discomfort last night
Sinus tachycardia LAD Inf Q wave MI ST elev II, III, avF 7

12 52 y/o woman with substernal CP
Sinus tachycardia Acute (anteroseptal Q wave) MI ST & T wave abnormalities suggesting myocardial ischemia suggesting myocardial injury 13

13 24 y/o man with brief sharp pain in chest two weeks ago
Sinus bradycardia Early repolarization 25

14 59 y/o man with several days of CP and cough
Sinus rhythm Diffuse ST elevation Peaked T’s inferiorly Findings suggest acute pericarditis 27

15

16 If not an emergency, is CAD (i.e., stable angina) a consideration?
No (not really) Consider diagnoses: Musculoskeletal GERD/esoph spasm Panic disorder Somatoform sensations and worries

17 Musculoskeletal What is the pretest probability that someone coming to clinic with chest pain has a musculoskeletal etiology? History Exam Reproducible: LR LR-0.78 Caution

18 GERD/esophageal spasm
About one out of 5 clinic CP patients History Exam not helpful Empiric trial may be your best “test”

19 Panic attack “In the past 6 months, did you ever have a spell or attack when all of a sudden you felt frightened, anxious, or very uneasy?” “In the past 6 months, did you ever have a spell or attack when for no reason your heart suddenly began to race, you felt faint, or you could not catch your breath?”

20 Panic attack “No” to both questions is helpful Others
Lowers from about 8% pretest to about 1% posttest Others Fear of “going crazy” Feeling of “unreality” (derealization) Feeling of “being outside of oneself” (depersonalization)

21 A perception among clinicians (and patients): A normal test result is enough to reassure a patient that nothing is wrong Is it?

22 McDonald IG, et al. Opening Pandora’s box: the unpredictability of reassurance by normal test result. BMJ 1996:313: 6 university cardiologists recruited 40 patients to exclude heart disease 30 asymptomatic w/ systolic murmur heard, 10 w/ palpitations Anxiety level before and after (asap and 9-12 mos) echocardiogram Echo normal in 37; only 1 had significant abnormality 30/38 had pretest anxiety (all 10 w/sxs) 55 % of the asymptomatic pts had residual anxiety _______of symptomatic pts had residual anxiety 100 %

23 If not an emergency, is CAD (i.e., stable angina) a consideration?
No (not really) Consider diagnoses: Musculoskeletal GERD/esoph spasm Panic disorder Somatoform sensations and worries Yes Consider stress test Assign a pretest probability Determine if a stress test (and which type) will “move” that probability in any meaningful way

24 Pretest probability Kind of chest pain Age Sex
Typical = SS, brought on by exertion, relieved by rest Atypical = 2 out of 3 Nonanginal = 1 out of 3 Age Sex

25 Diamond and Forrester

26 Test / treat threshold Test Treat 0% 100% ? Test Treat

27 Test / treat threshold <10% = don’t test (& don’t treat)
10-90 = testing zone >90% = don’t test, just treat (with cath)

28 ETT Sensitivity ~68% Specificity ~77%

29 Sample patient 38 y/o man with diffuse (left and right) CP while running on treadmill Relieved after about 15 minutes once run stopped Typical, atypical, or nonanginal?

30 Diamond and Forrester

31 Specificity * (1-pretest)
Using a 2 X 2 table Positive disease Negative disease Positive test Negative test Sensitivity * pretest Specificity * (1-pretest) 22 78 100 Pretest probability of having disease Hypothetical sample of people

32 Using a 2 X 2 table Positive disease Negative disease Positive test
Negative test 0.68*22 = 15 18 33 0.77*78 = 60 7 67 22 78 100 Pretest probability of having disease Hypothetical sample of people

33 Deriving post-test probability
If positive ETT, the post-test probability = 15/33 = 45% If negative ETT, the post-test probability of having disease is 7/67 = 10%

34 How much does the ETT help?
After a positive test (45%) After a negative test (10%) What now? Before the test (22%)

35 Bottom-line Very low or low – not going to help much
Intermediate – most helpful But might need further testing (serial testing) High – not going to help all that much (if it’s negative, are you going to believe it?)

36 A brief ETT primer

37 Examples of ETT findings
Patient 1 54 y/o man with a family history of CAD No chest pain

38 Pretest probability

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47 Cath report

48 Patient 2 57 y/o man w/ episodes of sudden onset of heavy breathing & discomfort in the center of his chest with exertion Episodes last 10 minutes No h/o CAD, HTN, DM Remote history of smoking

49 Pretest probability

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59 Duke treadmill score -18 estimates an annual cardiovascular mortality of 7% and a five year survival of 64% Using the Duke Score there is a high probability of severe angiographic coronary disease

60 Same day cath

61 2 days later

62 Don’t order a regular ETT if…
Pt cannot walk on treadmill (for 6 minutes) Severe obesity – consider PET Pt has LBBB or enough baseline ST segment abnormality that will make it difficult to interpret (e.g., LVH with “strain”) Pt on digitalis

63 Summary The epidemiology of CP in the office setting is different than in the ER setting First step is still to assess for one of the biggies After that, use history and (to lesser extent) exam to guide you Consider pretest probability before ordering a stress test

64 Thank you for your attention!


Download ppt "Sorting out chest pain in the office setting"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google