Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Good water quality downstream and ‘Pollution Alerts’

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Good water quality downstream and ‘Pollution Alerts’"— Presentation transcript:

1 Good water quality downstream and ‘Pollution Alerts’
Mandy Pyke

2 Seafish NDPB pan-industry body “...a broker...” Funded by industry
Range of expertise, projects and initiatives

3 Coastal Activity

4 Terrestrial Activity and the Coastal Zone
‘Pollution from farming is a major contributor to water pollution. The aim of Catchment Sensitive Farming (CSF) in England is to reduce pollution from farming in surface waters, groundwaters and other aquatic habitats, both in the immediate catchment and further downstream.’ The reason agriculture is important to the shellfish sector is that faecal contamination from bovine sources increases the E.coli levels in coastal shellfish production areas.

5 Classification for Bivalve Harvesting

6 Classification System
‘Prohibited’ ‘C’ ‘B’ ‘A’ Source: Cefas website

7 Excluding Cattle Reduces E.coli in Shellfish Harvesting Areas.

8 Norovirus 3 Million cases a year
17% of people shedding virons at any one time 2.5% - 10%? from contaminated food Asymptomatic food handlers Can’t determine viability

9 Outbreaks

10 Where does Norovirus come from
Humans Person to person Asymptomatic Food Handlers Hospitals Instant villages Septic Tanks Sewage treatment works (CSO’s) (Source: Syvret, FitzGerald, Pyke, Hamilton 2010: Report for SARF)

11 CSO’s Implicated “…CSO discharges contain a greater concentration of infectious virus (as judged by FRNA bacteriophage) than treated wastewater Controlling the impact of CSO discharges requires consideration…” Assessing the impact of wastewater treatment plant effluent on norovirus contamination in shellfisheries EPA STRIVE project: 2008-EH-MS-7-53 Shellfish Safety Workshop April 18th 2013, Marine Institute, Galway John Flannery, Sinéad Keaveney, Paulina RajkoNenow and Bill Dore CSO’s do add NoV to marine environment

12 Sewage Treatment We cannot build our way out of the problem
European CODEX White Paper (2010) Focus on Pre-harvest removal of load Call for x4 log reduction from sewage treatment DEFRA/WRc Study (2011) Only ~ x2-3 log reduction from sewage treatment We cannot build our way out of the problem licensed under the Creative Commons KEY SLIDE (to expand) NB 4 log reduction not possible to achieve and will have significant financial implications with dubious benefits (esp if CSOs are still discharging!!!!) Recent report oyster industry (EU regulations) Relay possibility - characterisation Phase 1 – Site optimisation – maximuse growth vs quality Site specific – issues Cc tool to provide more active amangement

13 EFSA Scientific Opinion on The Present Knowledge on The Occurrence and Control of foodborne Viruses Recommendations There are no “safe limits” Introduce virus criteria unless labelled “to be cooked before consumption”. E. Coli monitoring and classification ‘should’ be retained Depuration discredited as control for Norovirus Introduce prohibition zones in proximity of sewage discharges More stringent Cat B standards Post harvest treatment validated for virucidal activity Use of Pollution Alert procedures

14 Text Alert for CSO spills
EFSA recommendation Ministerial Initiative Trials and Pilots in SW and East Coast Seafish is I.T. conduit between Water Companies and Harvesters SAGB closely involved

15 Seafish issues text Alert
Water Company monitors CSO CSO - Dormant Weather Event overwhelms CSO Alarm Triggered From: Seafish Lachington CSO has Started. Water quality may be affected. Please visit for more info. Water Company s Seafish Shellfish harvester receives text alert Seafish issues text Alert

16 Active Management Harvest Delay Cancel Move Enhanced Depuration?
Enhanced EPT Communicate

17 Seafish Guidance for All Stakeholders
Characterisation Elements to be considered Trigger criteria different for different regions Workshops Plume Models Characterisation of each water body needed. Existing plume models may substitute if suitable Trigger criteria may change according to WC capability. Industry in area need to be able to understand significance of any alert Workshops were planned, lack of money prevented implementation

18 Text Message Trend By Area
Reflects Rainfall? System is over reporting – float switches? New System we are using floats we know the system is over reporting – we need to switch it over onto the new FDT monitors before we can use the data in this way as I suspect that this is going to improve performance.

19 What next What are harvesters doing? Roll out Pan UK?
Integrate with other stakeholders

20 Conclusions Activity upstream affects Seafood cultivation downstream
Communication is key Broaden horizons

21 Any Questions? Thank you To: Anglian Water South West Water SAGB EACWF
Aquafish Solutions Limited


Download ppt "Good water quality downstream and ‘Pollution Alerts’"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google