Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Anthony D. Wagner, Anat Maril, and Daniel L. Schacter

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Anthony D. Wagner, Anat Maril, and Daniel L. Schacter"— Presentation transcript:

1 Interactions Between Forms of Memory: When Priming Hinders New Episodic Learning
Anthony D. Wagner, Anat Maril, and Daniel L. Schacter Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2000 Wei-Chung Lee April 25, 2001

2 Forms of Memory Long Term Memory Explicit (Declarative)
Implicit (Non-declarative) Semantic (Facts) Episodic (Events) Priming Procedural Associative Learning Nonassociative Learning Emotional responses Skeletal musculature Medial temporal lobe Neocortex Striatum Amygdala Cerebellum Reflex pathways

3 Motivation ? When and how do these different forms of memory interact?
Long Term Memory Explicit (Declarative) Implicit (Non-declarative) Semantic (Facts) Episodic (Events) Priming Procedural Associative Learning Nonassociative Medial temporal lobe Skeletal musculature Emotional responses Reflex pathways Amygdala Striatum Neocortex Cerebellum ?

4 Episodic Memory Explicit memory for conscious recollection of events from past experience Buckner and Koustaal, 1998

5 Perceptual Repetition Priming
Facilitation derived from repeated exposure to a stimulus Buckner et al., 1998

6 Hypothesis Priming for past experiences can hinder new episodic encoding. Long Term Memory Explicit (Declarative) Implicit (Non-declarative) Semantic (Facts) Episodic (Events) Priming Procedural Associative Learning Nonassociative Medial temporal lobe Skeletal musculature Emotional responses Reflex pathways Amygdala Striatum Neocortex Cerebellum

7 Predictions Enhanced behavioral and neural priming during re-encoding with a shorter (2 min.) relative to a longer (25 hr.) lag between two encoding episodes. Impaired long-term retention of episodic memory in conditions with greater behavioral and neural priming. Lag Effect: shorter lags between repetitions deleterious to explicit memory (Ebbinghaus, 1885).

8 Experimental Procedure
Varied temporal lag between initial and repeated encoding episodes with words.

9 Behavioral Priming Mean median Reaction Times (RTs) for Abstract/Concrete decision (msec). Once-presented: 777 Long-Lag: 763 Short-Lag: 720 * ** ** ** * p < ** p <

10 Neural Correlates of Episodic encoding and Repetition Priming
Once-presented > Fixation Once-presented > All Re-encoding A subset of regions activated by episodic encoding demonstrate a significant repetition priming effect (i.e.. decrease in activation): anterior-LIPC, posterior-LIPC, and left fusiform cortex.

11 Lag Effects on ROI Activation
Long-Lag > Short-Lag Priming also effects activation in left frontal operculum, left middle frontal, and medial frontal regions (Data not shown) Greater neural correlate of priming during re-encoding following a shorter temporal lag rather than long

12 Explicit Memory Explicit memory scores = (pHit - pFalse alarm)
Overall (High & Low Confidence) pHit Long-Lag 35% 77% Short-Lag 31% 73% Once-Presented 22% 64% “High Confidence” explicit memory Long-Lag 32% 46% Short-Lag 25% 38% Once-Presented 17% 30% * ** ** ** ** ** * p < ** p <

13 Priming Negatively Correlates with Subsequent Explicit Memory
A negative association across-subjects between behavioral & neural (posterior & anterior-LIPC shown) priming and subsequent explicit memory. Reliable correlations not found for Short-Lag trials (highest levels of priming led to lowest levels of “High Confidence” => range too small)

14 Conclusions Correlation of behavioral and neural measures of priming during the re-encoding of a stimulus and impaired episodic encoding. “cross-talk” between implicit and explicit forms of memory. Posited mechanism: Priming reduces “encoding variability” or multiple retrieval routes increasing the probability that same task-relevant stimulus features ...

15 Implications & Questions
Consolidation? Time course of Lag Effect; optimal time to re-encode? Attention? 1 L neocortex  1x106 neurons  1x109 synapses and 1 voxel  Segregation of memory types justified? Activation maps show significant differences in Blood Oxygenation Levels. Encoding versus re-encoding Not encoding/re-encoding the same words between sessions - may evoke different “meanings”/saliencies.


Download ppt "Anthony D. Wagner, Anat Maril, and Daniel L. Schacter"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google