1. Building memories remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity Anthony D. Wagner, Daniel L. Schacter, Michael Rotte, Wilma Koutstaal, Anat Maril, Anders M. Dale, Bruce R. Rosen, Randy L. Buckner By: Andrea Ching Anthony D. Wagner, Daniel L. Schacter, Michael Rotte, Wilma Koutstaal, Anat Maril, Anders M. Dale, Bruce R. Rosen, Randy L. Buckner By: Andrea Ching

2. Background  What is memory encoding? Memory encoding refers to the processes by which an experience is transformed into an enduring memory trace.  What is memory encoding? Memory encoding refers to the processes by which an experience is transformed into an enduring memory trace.

3. Background  Memorability of an event is influenced by the cognitive operations during the initial encoding of the event.  Semantic processing>Nonsemantic processing  Memorability of an event is influenced by the cognitive operations during the initial encoding of the event.  Semantic processing>Nonsemantic processing

4. Background  Left pre-frontal cortex involved in verbal encoding  Left pre-frontal cortex activation greater in semantic relative to non-semantic encoding.  Left pre-frontal cortex involved in verbal encoding  Left pre-frontal cortex activation greater in semantic relative to non-semantic encoding.

5. Background  Medial temporal regions Lesion studies  No medial temporal activation Neuroimaging studies  Parahippocampal gyrus Novel stimuli > familiar stimuli  Medial temporal regions Lesion studies  No medial temporal activation Neuroimaging studies  Parahippocampal gyrus Novel stimuli > familiar stimuli

6. Method-First Experiment  Twelve normal, right handed subjects  Seven men, five women  Aged 18-29 years  Twelve normal, right handed subjects  Seven men, five women  Aged 18-29 years

7. Method-First Experiment  Blocked design experiment Trials from each encoding condition are presented sequentially inseparable from each other during the scan  Comparison between activation during semantic vs non-semantic processing task  Blocked design experiment Trials from each encoding condition are presented sequentially inseparable from each other during the scan  Comparison between activation during semantic vs non-semantic processing task

8. Method-First Experiment  Alternating task-blocks Semantic processing Non-semantic processing Visual fixation  Novelty of the words are equivalent in semantic and non-semantic blocks.  Alternating task-blocks Semantic processing Non-semantic processing Visual fixation  Novelty of the words are equivalent in semantic and non-semantic blocks.

9. Method-First Experiment  During semantic and nonsemantic blocks, 20 words were visually presented: 10 abstract and 10 concrete nouns; half in uppercase and half in lowercase letters.  Each word was presented for 1 s followed by 1 s of fixation between words.  Memory was assessed using a yes-no recognition procedure after 20 to 40 minutes  During semantic and nonsemantic blocks, 20 words were visually presented: 10 abstract and 10 concrete nouns; half in uppercase and half in lowercase letters.  Each word was presented for 1 s followed by 1 s of fixation between words.  Memory was assessed using a yes-no recognition procedure after 20 to 40 minutes

10. Results-First Experiment  Reaction times were longer for semantic decisions  Subsequent memory was superior following semantic (85% recognized) than following non-semantic processing(47% recognized).  Reaction times were longer for semantic decisions  Subsequent memory was superior following semantic (85% recognized) than following non-semantic processing(47% recognized).

11. Greater Activation during Semantic Processing

12. Method-Second Experiment  Thirteen normal, right-handed subjects  Six men and seven women  Aged 18-35 years  Thirteen normal, right-handed subjects  Six men and seven women  Aged 18-35 years

13. Method-Second Experiment  Event-related fMRI was used while participants performed a single incidental encoding task.  Word and fixation events presented in a continuous series of 120 intermixed trials.  Semantic decision during word trials(abstract or concrete).  Recognition test (High or low confidence).  Event-related fMRI was used while participants performed a single incidental encoding task.  Word and fixation events presented in a continuous series of 120 intermixed trials.  Semantic decision during word trials(abstract or concrete).  Recognition test (High or low confidence).

14. Method-Second Experiment  fMRI data analysis: four encoding trial types High confidence hits Low confidence hits Misses Fixation  fMRI data analysis: four encoding trial types High confidence hits Low confidence hits Misses Fixation

15. Results-Second Experiment  Word processing relative to fixation resulted in greater activation  High confidence hits to misses Multiple left prefrontal regions Left parahippocampal gyrus Fusiform gyrus  Word processing relative to fixation resulted in greater activation  High confidence hits to misses Multiple left prefrontal regions Left parahippocampal gyrus Fusiform gyrus

16. Discussion  Magnitude of activation is greater in remembered events Subsequently remembered events are processed longer during learning  Reaction times for high confidence hits and miss trials were matched Greater activation in left prefrontal and temporal regions in subsequently remembered items  Magnitude of activation is greater in remembered events Subsequently remembered events are processed longer during learning  Reaction times for high confidence hits and miss trials were matched Greater activation in left prefrontal and temporal regions in subsequently remembered items

17. Discussion  Left parahippocampal gyrus is more active in later remembered events even though both were equally novel  Extends beyond novelty detection more general encoding mechanism  Principal neocortical input to hippocampal region important role in memory formation  Left parahippocampal gyrus is more active in later remembered events even though both were equally novel  Extends beyond novelty detection more general encoding mechanism  Principal neocortical input to hippocampal region important role in memory formation

18. Conclusion  Verbal experience may be more memorable when semantic and phonological attributes are processed via the left prefrontal regions.  Organization in working memory serves as input to the parahippocampal gyrus and the medial temporal memory system.  Left prefrontal and temporal processes will tend to produce more memorable verbal events.  Verbal experience may be more memorable when semantic and phonological attributes are processed via the left prefrontal regions.  Organization in working memory serves as input to the parahippocampal gyrus and the medial temporal memory system.  Left prefrontal and temporal processes will tend to produce more memorable verbal events.

19. Strengths  Limited confounds Reaction times  Were able to identify many brain regions that were involved in remembering  Limited confounds Reaction times  Were able to identify many brain regions that were involved in remembering

20. Limitations  Small sample size

21. Future Research  Instead of words they could use pictures  Age, sex differences  Instead of words they could use pictures  Age, sex differences

22. References Wagner AD, Schacter DL, Rotte M, Koutstaal W, Maril A, Dale AM, Rosen BR, Buckner RL (1998) Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. Science, 281(5350), 1188 –1191.