Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

by J. Wang, A. Scholl, H. Zheng, S. B. Ogale, D. Viehland, D. G

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "by J. Wang, A. Scholl, H. Zheng, S. B. Ogale, D. Viehland, D. G"— Presentation transcript:

1 Response to Comment on "Epitaxial BiFeO3 Multiferroic Thin Film Heterostructures"
by J. Wang, A. Scholl, H. Zheng, S. B. Ogale, D. Viehland, D. G. Schlom, N. A. Spaldin, K. M. Rabe, M. Wuttig, L. Mohaddes, J. Neaton, U. Waghmare, T. Zhao, and R. Ramesh Science Volume 307(5713): February 25, 2005 American Association for the Advancement of Science

2 Fig. 1. (A) Magnetic response from BFO films grown on 001 STO with different thickness.
(A) Magnetic response from BFO films grown on 001 STO with different thickness. (B) Comparison of VSM and SQUID results on the 100-nm BFO/SRO/STO (001) sample used in (2). Care was taken to remove any silver spots on the substrate by grinding with emery paper. J. Wang et al. Science 2005;307:1203 American Association for the Advancement of Science

3 Fig. 2. (A) XMCD results for the 30-nm, 90-nm, and 120-nm BFO/STO (001) samples.
(A) XMCD results for the 30-nm, 90-nm, and 120-nm BFO/STO (001) samples. (B) Comparison of XMCD spectrums of Fe3O4 and the BFO film. J. Wang et al. Science 2005;307:1203 American Association for the Advancement of Science


Download ppt "by J. Wang, A. Scholl, H. Zheng, S. B. Ogale, D. Viehland, D. G"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google