Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX

Published byΛεωνίδας Κολιάτσος Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX"— Presentation transcript:

1 p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX
K. Tanida (RIKEN/RBRC) RSC meeting 11/18/03 Outline Relative luminosity - estimation of systematic error - ALL in ZDC/BBC LocalPol Counting number of p0’s Result

2 ALL (P) Polarization (L) Relative Luminosity (N) Number of pi0s
++ same helicity + opposite helicity (P) Polarization (L) Relative Luminosity (N) Number of pi0s

3 How to get relative luminosity?
Principle: R=N++/N+- -- from any counter (trigger) BBCLL1 trigger - coincidence of two Beam-Beam Counters - small background (~ 10-4) - high statistics (detects ~ 1/2 of all collisions) - ALLBBC: expected to be small, need confirmation BBC-South BBC-North ⊿η = 3.0 ~ 3.9 ⊿φ = 2π cm

4 Method of accuracy estimation
Cross-check by ZDCLL1 trigger (Zero Degree Calorimeter) - low background (~ 10-4) - statistics: moderate (~ 3% of BBCLL1) N(ZDCLL1)/N(BBCLL1) must be constant Crossing-by-crossing, fill-by-fill ratio calculation Blue: Yellow:  We have all spin combinations in each fill GL1p scaler counts both BBCLL1 and ZDCLL1 for each crossing Required accuracy: constant to 10-3 level for each fill.

5 crossing-by-crossing ratio
c2/dof = 346/45 Significant deviation from constant. Why?

6 Possible explanation – detector acceptance
run 87693 Extreme cases - Flat acceptance  N: area - Narrow acceptance  N: height crossing 74 counts crossing 90 BBC Z vertex (cm) ZDCLL1: Z-vertex resolution ~ 20 cm (wider acceptance) BBCLL1: ~ 5 cm (narrower) (both have Z-vertex cut at ±30 cm)

7 Correlation with Z-vertex width
c2/dof = 55.1/45 [cm] Z-vertex width [cm] We understand the reason now  correction

8 After correction c2/dof = 54.8/45 Relative luminosity accuracy < 0.09% (stat. limited)

9 Alternative correction
Actual vertex width is not yet available in most runs (will come soon) Alternative width estimation  use ZDCout/ZDCin ratio ZDCin: ZDCLL1 counts with Z-vertex cut of 30 cm ZDCout: ZDCLL1 outside of ZDCin (both are counted crossing-by-crossing)  wider vertex distribution  larger ratio

10 Actual accuracy estimation -- Bunch fitting
Crossing-by-crossing analysis, taking care of possible effect of ALL in BBC and ZDC For i-th crossing, calculate r(i) = NZDCLL1(i)/NBBCLL1(i) corrected for vertex width Fit r(i) by r(i) = C[1+ALLBBC/ZDCPB(i)PY(i)] fit parameter: C, ALLBBC/ZDC You will get C, ALLBBC/ZDC, their errors, and c2 - accuracy is obtained as dALLBBC/ZDC (x PBPY) - c2 gives a good check for systematic errors.

11 c2 vs stat. error – before correction
1 point/fill w/o vertex width correction correlating  ssyst ~ 0.002 c2/dof = 1+(ssyst/sstat)2 ssyst = 0.002 c2/dof statistical error (deLL, sstat)

12 c2 vs stat. error – after correction
fill 3735 correlation is weak, but still some systematic effect remains bad fill c2/dof = 1+(ssyst/sstat)2 ssyst = 0.001 c2/dof statistical error (dALL, sstat)

13 Result & BBC/ZDC ALL Systematic error seen  c2 correction required
If c2/dof is larger than 1, then enlarge statistical error by sqrt(c2/dof) – conservative correction Averaged result: ALLBBC/ZDC = (1.8±1.8) x (without vertex width correction, dALL is ~2 larger) This corresponds to relative luminosity accuracy of dR = 2.5 x 10-4  Achieved the goal ZDC-BBC ALL is 0 consistent  we can use both for reference of ALL = 0

14 Some notes We reached dALLBBC/ZDC=1.8 x this is dominated by statistics of ZDC, so it’s rather conservative estimation - actual relative luminosity is given by BBC In p0 analysis, vertex position dependence of acceptance is the same as BBCLL1 because - BBC hits are required in the analysis - PHENIX central arm acceptance is almost flat for p0 within the region we are using (±30 cm)

15 Remaining tasks for rel. luminosity
Apply offline Z-vertex cut - better resolution: ~ 5 cm  ~ 2 cm (effect is found to be small) Full accuracy estimation using real vertex distribution. - correction for other than vertex width? Study effect of multiple collisions - negligible in Run3, significant for higher luminosity. Z-vertex dependence of acceptance (efficiency) for BBCLL1, p0 and other reaction channels. - reaction channel specific relative luminosity. - BBCLL1 itself is almost perfect for p0 case, but may be not for other channels.

16 Vertex distribution (BBCLL1)
reject reject counts accept offline Zvertex [cm] changes rel. lumi. by < 0.04% per fill (negligible)

17 PHENIX Local Polarimeter
Forward neutron transverse asymmetry (AN) measurements SMD (position) + ZDC (energy) f distribution SMD Vertical  f ~ ±p/2 Radial  f ~ 0 Longitudinal  no asymmetry ZDC

18 Spin Longitudinal Component
ST is measured with PHENIX Local Polarimeter Left-Right asymmetry Up-Down asymmetry

19 p0 counting Data collected with high pT photon trigger
Based on EMCal; Threshold ~1.4 GeV/c Rejection factor ~110 Analyzed data sample: 42.7M events (~0.215 pb-1) sqrt(<PbPy>)~26% Minimum Bias data To obtain “unbiased” 0 cross section at low pT For high pT photon trigger efficiency study

20 p0 reconstruction for ALL
1-2 GeV/c Bckgr=45% 2-3 GeV/c Bckgr=17% Results obtained for four pt bins from 1 to 5 GeV/c Pi0 peak width varies from 12 to 9.5 MeV/c2 from lowest to highest pt bins Background contribution under pi0 peak for 25 MeV/c2 mass cut varies from 45% to 5% from lowest to highest pt bins 3-4 GeV/c Bckgr=7% 4-5 GeV/c Bckgr=5%

21 p0 counting for ALL N0: Nbck1: Nbck2:
25 MeV/c2 around 0 peak (and also 15 and 35 MeV/c2 for cross checks) Nbck1: Two 50 MeV/c2 wide areas adjacent to 0 peak Nbck2: 250 MeV/c2 wide area between 0 and  peaks N0 and Nbck accumulated statistics pt GeV/c N0 15 MeV/c2 25 MeV/c2 35 MeV/c2 Nbck1 Nbck2 1-2 1278k 1777k 2129k 1470k 3478k 2-3 874k 1059k 1146k 335k 989k 3-4 176k 201k 208k 27k 83k 4-5 34k 38k 39k 3.9k 12k

22 N0 statistical error estimation
dk/dNev dk/dNev N0 Nbck2 In multi-0 events: Comparison to naïve approach: Fluctuation enhancement (squared) due to multi-particle events pt GeV/c N0 15 MeV/c2 25 MeV/c2 35 MeV/c2 Nbck1 Nbck2 1-2 1.134 1.220 1.302 1.360 1.708 2-3 1.047 1.081 1.114 1.178 1.406 3-4 1.015 1.026 1.037 1.101 1.222 4-5 1.008 1.021 1.059 1.162

23 ALL measurements Procedure ++ same helicity + opposite helicity
Collect N and L for ++ and + configurations (sum over all crossings) and calculate ALL for each fill Average ALL over fills; use 2/NDF to control fit quality; use “bunch shuffling” to check syst. errors

24 ALL Calculations ALL averaged over fills 1-2 GeV/c 2-3 GeV/c 3-4 GeV/c
2/ndf = 64/48 2-3 GeV/c ALL= -2.2%±1.5% 2/ndf = 34/48 3-4 GeV/c ALL= -0.2%±3.3% 2/ndf = 49/48 4-5 GeV/c ALL= -2.3%±7.4% 2/ndf = 39/48 4-5 GeV/c 3-4 GeV/c

25 AL check for “yellow” beam
pt GeV/c 15 MeV/c2 25 MeV/c2 35 MeV/c2 1-2 0.0010.004 0.0000.003 0.0020.004 2-3 0.0000.004 0.0020.007 0.0020.005 3-4 0.0070.009 0.0110.009 0.0080.009 -0.0330.025 -0.0100.015 4-5 -0.0010.021 0.0040.020 0.0080.020 0.0200.064 0.0500.039 All are zeros within 1.5

26 AL check for “blue” beam
pt GeV/c 15 MeV/c2 25 MeV/c2 35 MeV/c2 1-2 -0.0010.004 0.0010.003 0.0000.003 -0.0020.004 -0.0000.003 2-3 0.0010.004 0.0000.004 0.0020.004 0.0090.007 0.0000.005 3-4 0.0040.009 0.0060.009 0.0060.008 -0.0040.024 -0.0360.015 4-5 -0.0240.021 -0.0160.020 -0.0160.019 -0.0110.062 0.0130.038 All are zeros within 1.5, except

27 (Background subtracted)
0 ALL result pT GeV/c (rbck) (Background subtracted) 1-2 -0.0280.012 (45%) -0.0060.014 -0.0460.025 2-3 -0.0220.015 (17%) -0.0350.027 -0.0190.019 3-4 -0.0020.033 (7%) 0.0940.092 -0.0090.036 4-5 -0.0230.074 (5%) 0.380.24 -0.0450.079 Polarization scaling error P ~30%: is not included Enters the ALL quadratically Analyzing power AN(100 GeV) ~ AN(22GeV) is assumed P~30%: combined stat. and syst. error for AN(22GeV) (AGS E950) pT smearing correction is not included

28 Summary Relative luminosity – systematics is mostly due to crossing by crossing variation of Z-vertex width and acceptance difference  correction applied Relative luminosity accuracy dALL = 1.8 x 10-3 achieved Relative luminosity is reaction channel dependent - For p0 analysis, BBCLL1 is good enough. Preliminary result for p0 ALL obtained Various null tests – all OK statistical and systematic errors are well studied.

Download ppt "p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX"

Similar presentations

PHENIX local RUN9 RHIC meeting Manabu Togawa for the PHENIX 1.

PHENIX local RUN9 RHIC meeting Manabu Togawa for the PHENIX 1.
1 Measurement of the single transverse- spin asymmetry of forward neutrons in p-p collisions at RHIC-PHENIX Manabu Togawa for the PHENIX collaboration.

1 Measurement of the single transverse- spin asymmetry of forward neutrons in p-p collisions at RHIC-PHENIX Manabu Togawa for the PHENIX collaboration.
Measurement of charmonia at mid-rapidity at RHIC-PHENIX  c  J/   e + e -  in p+p collisions at √s=200GeV Susumu Oda CNS, University of Tokyo For.

Measurement of charmonia at mid-rapidity at RHIC-PHENIX  c  J/   e + e -  in p+p collisions at √s=200GeV Susumu Oda CNS, University of Tokyo For.
09/30/'06SPIN2006, T. Horaguchi1 Measurement of the direct photon production in polarized proton-proton collisions at  s= 200GeV with PHENIX CNS, University.

09/30/'06SPIN2006, T. Horaguchi1 Measurement of the direct photon production in polarized proton-proton collisions at  s= 200GeV with PHENIX CNS, University.
10/03/'06 SPIN2006, T. Horaguchi 1 Measurement of the direct photon production in polarized proton-proton collisions at  s= 200GeV with PHENIX CNS, University.

10/03/'06 SPIN2006, T. Horaguchi 1 Measurement of the direct photon production in polarized proton-proton collisions at  s= 200GeV with PHENIX CNS, University.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.

W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Status of W analysis in PHENIX Central Arm Kensuke Okada (RBRC) For the PHENIX collaboration RHIC Spin Collaboration meeting November 21, 2009 11/21/20091K.Okada.

Status of W analysis in PHENIX Central Arm Kensuke Okada (RBRC) For the PHENIX collaboration RHIC Spin Collaboration meeting November 21, /21/20091K.Okada.
Single Electron Measurements at RHIC-PHENIX T. Hachiya Hiroshima University For the PHENIX Collaboration.

Single Electron Measurements at RHIC-PHENIX T. Hachiya Hiroshima University For the PHENIX Collaboration.
Observation of W decay in 500GeV p+p collisions at RHIC Kensuke Okada for the PHENIX collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute February 20, 2010 2/20/20101.

Observation of W decay in 500GeV p+p collisions at RHIC Kensuke Okada for the PHENIX collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute February 20, /20/20101.
PHENIX Local Polarimeter PSTP 2007 at BNL September 11, 2007 Yuji Goto (RIKEN/RBRC)

PHENIX Local Polarimeter PSTP 2007 at BNL September 11, 2007 Yuji Goto (RIKEN/RBRC)
What can we learn from η production in proton-proton collisions? Joe Seele MIT and University of Colorado.

What can we learn from η production in proton-proton collisions? Joe Seele MIT and University of Colorado.
October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.

October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.

Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
J/  production in p+p collisions at PHENIX and gluon distribution QWG meeting at FNAL September 20-22 Hiroki Sato (Kyoto University) for the PHENIX collaboration.

J/  production in p+p collisions at PHENIX and gluon distribution QWG meeting at FNAL September Hiroki Sato (Kyoto University) for the PHENIX collaboration.
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.

Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.

Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.

M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.
2004 Fall JPS meeting (English version) K.Okada1 Measurement of prompt photon in sqrt(s)=200GeV pp collisions Kensuke Okada (RIKEN-BNL research center)

2004 Fall JPS meeting (English version) K.Okada1 Measurement of prompt photon in sqrt(s)=200GeV pp collisions Kensuke Okada (RIKEN-BNL research center)
Charged Particle Multiplicity and Transverse Energy in √s nn = 130 GeV Au+Au Collisions Klaus Reygers University of Münster, Germany for the PHENIX Collaboration.

Charged Particle Multiplicity and Transverse Energy in √s nn = 130 GeV Au+Au Collisions Klaus Reygers University of Münster, Germany for the PHENIX Collaboration.
1 Nuclear modification and elliptic flow measurements for  mesons at  s NN = 200 GeV d+Au and Au+Au collisions by PHENIX Dipali Pal for the PHENIX collaboration.

1 Nuclear modification and elliptic flow measurements for  mesons at  s NN = 200 GeV d+Au and Au+Au collisions by PHENIX Dipali Pal for the PHENIX collaboration.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google