Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

COMPARISON OF COASTAL CURRENTS FROM HF RADAR AND ADCP DATA

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "COMPARISON OF COASTAL CURRENTS FROM HF RADAR AND ADCP DATA"— Presentation transcript:

1 COMPARISON OF COASTAL CURRENTS FROM HF RADAR AND ADCP DATA
OC3570 LCDR Kim, KC ROKN 16 SEP 2003

2 PURPOSE to examine the Horizontal Pattern of Shear observed on July 21 to examine the Relationship of CODAR data with ADCP data to describe the Surface Current Circulation in Monterey Bay

3 Fundamental Issues on Naval OPS
Littoral Ocean complicated coastline and complex bathymetry winds, waves, and currents interact with the boundaries on much smaller space and time scales Conventional measurement techniques are limited military operations in Littoral Ocean Mine OPS Amphibious OPS LOTS(Logistics over the Shore) OPS

4 HF RD Introduction Usage Measuring Currents
to measure sfc current Vel fields near the coast to provide a higher resolution in space Measuring Currents Resonant Bragg Scattering: amplifies the scattered signal directed toward the reciever

5 Doppler Shift: how to calculate the surface currents
When electromagnetic waves interact with a mobile surface, the surface velocity induces a shift  = 2 u/ c Simple situation: a current constant with depth travelling in the direction of wave propagation cw = cpw + U under the assumption U<<cpw cw = cpw + cw(k) : original frequency u: vel of the TGT c: speed of light c: wave’s apparent speed cp: wave’s phase speed U (z): horizontal current vel profile

6 Sample HF Doppler spectrum showing Bragg resonant peaks from
approaching and receding waves.

7

8

9 DATA Collection *

10 DATA Collection(Cont’)
B Time series on A and B A B

11 DATA Collection(Cont’)
Data for Time series on A and B Total Data Points Missing Data Points Mean STD Time Gap U Vel. At HF RD 52 9 -0.57 cm/s 9.68 60 min V Vel. At HF RD -0.56 cm/s 9.5 U Vel. At 15m 104 0.57 cm/s 4.62 30 min U Vel. At 23m 1.22 cm/s 5.08 U Vel. At 31m 2.14 cm/s 4.81 V Vel. At 15m 1.56 cm/s 6.78 V Vel. At 23m 2.41 cm/s 5.61 V Vel. At 31m 2.91 cm/s 4.36

12 Bathymetry of the Canyon

13 LEG I

14 Depth: 15m Depth: 25m Depth: 75m Depth: 125m

15 Depth: 175m Depth: 225m Depth: 275m Depth: 325m

16 Time Series at the Head of Canyon

17 HF RD ADCP Depth: 15m ADCP Depth: 23m ADCP Depth: 31m

18 Total U Vel at 15m Total V Vel at 15m Corr.: 0.29 Corr.: Total U Vel at 23m Total V Vel at 23m Corr.: Corr.: Total U Vel at 31m Total V Vel at 31m Corr.: Corr.:

19 UA Vel at 15m VA Vel at 15m Corr.: Corr.: UA Vel at 23m VA Vel at 23m Corr.: Corr.: UA Vel at 31m VA Vel at 31m Corr.: Corr.:

20 UB Vel at 15m VB Vel at 15m Corr.: Corr.: UB Vel at 23m VB Vel at 23m Corr.: Corr.: UB Vel at 31m VB Vel at 31m Corr.: Corr.:

21

22 260400

23 261800

24 270400

25 Possible Reason?

26 SFC Current Circulation
In MTRY Bay( )

27

28 SFC Current Circulation
In MTRY Bay( )

29

30 Conclusion U Velocity has Low correlation but V has High.
More correlation on location B(Further off the coast) than A in both U and V component. Further experiment with a Longer Time series and more stations needed for the better understanding this process.

31 REFERENCES Special Issue on High Frequency Radars for Coastal Oceanography, Oceanography, Vol. 10, No Lorell A. Meadows, High Frequency Radar Measurements of Friction Velocity in the Marine Boundary Layer

32 QUESTION?


Download ppt "COMPARISON OF COASTAL CURRENTS FROM HF RADAR AND ADCP DATA"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google