1. Bob Heile Chair, 802.15, Wireless Specialty Networks
November 2016
Package Supporting Consent Agenda Items for Friday EC Meeting
Bob Heile
Chair, , Wireless Specialty Networks
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

2. November 2016
Contents
Approval to Forward the Response to 15.3 Comments Received from JTC1 SC6 (slide 3)
e, High Rate Close Proximity PHY, to RevCom (conditional) (slide 10)
t, Higher Rate (2mb/s) PHY, to RevCom (conditional) (slide 17)
, Layer 2 Routing, to RevCom (unconditional) (slide 25)
v Regional Sub GHz Bands, to Sponsor Ballot (conditional) (slide 32)
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

3. November 2016
to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO
IEEE Response to comments received from ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 6 60 day ballot
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

4. 802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO ISO/IEC ballot:
November 2016
to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO
ISO/IEC ballot:
Ballot title: Submission of IEEE Std High Data Rate Wireless Multi-Media Networks, for fast-track adoption under the ISO/IEEE PSDO Agreement
Opening date:
Closing date:
Votes cast (18)
Votes not cast (1)
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

5. 802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO Results:
November 2016
to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO
Results:
Answers to Q.1: "Do you support the need for an ISO International Standard on the subject?"
Yes 8, No 0, Abstain 10
Answers to Q.2: "Do you support the submission of this proposal for FDIS ballot?"
Yes 7, No 0, Abstain 10
Comments received: 1 each Italy (UNI) and Ukraine (DSTU), “Abstention”
1 from China (SAC)
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

6. 802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO Comment from China
November 2016
to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO
Comment from China
Comment: “IEEE TM-2016 (N16463) specifies that a secure membership or relationship should be established between the devices in the security models. However, it clearly clarifies that the process of establishing a secure membership or a secure relationship is outside of the scope of this standard. It only specifies the related content about key management and secure communication, which will easily cause that the devices cannot be interconnected due to the undefined method of establishing a secure relationship between devices, and reduce the standard availability.”
Proposed change: “Recommend adding the relevant method to establish a secure relationship or providing a method that can be referenced in the document.”
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

7. 802.15.3-2016 to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO Proposed response
November 2016
to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO
Proposed response
IEEE Std is part of the IEEE 802 family of standards and is compatible with IEEE Std 802.1X. The authentication protocols defined in IEEE Std 802.1X, e.g., the extensible authentication protocol (EAP), can be used to establish a secure relationship between devices.
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

8. November 2016
to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO
Response reviewed and approved by the WG on Monday
Response reviewed by the JTC1 SC6 SC on Tues. No changes were recommended
Response was reaffirmed by the WG on Weds with a request to seek EC approval to forward the response to JTC1 SC6
The preceding material is contained in
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

9. November 2016
to JTC1 SC6 under PSDO
Move to forward the response contained in response-to-iso-iec-jtc-1-sc-6-60-day-ballot, slide 5 (and repeated here on slide 7 in EC Doc ) to JTC1 SC6
(WG: )
Moved: Heile
Second: Gilb
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

10. 802.15.3e High Rate Close Proximity (HRCP) to RevCom (conditional)
November 2016
e High Rate Close Proximity (HRCP) to RevCom (conditional)
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

11. 802.15.3e Ballot History 75 yes, 4 no (94% approval ratio)
November 2016
e Ballot History
Initial Sponsor Ballot (P e/D04)
Opened: 29-Jul-2016
Closed: 28-Aug-2016
Vote results (pool of 96 voters)
79 responses (82% response ratio)
75 yes, 4 no (94% approval ratio)
0 abstain (0% abstain ratio)
256 comments from 8 commenters
105 marked as MBS
Comment resolution database worksheet:
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

12. 802.15.3e Ballot History 76 yes, 4 no (95% approval ratio)
November 2016
e Ballot History
Sponsor Ballot Recirc 1: (P e/D05)
Opened: 06-Oct-2016
Closed: 16-Oct-2016
Vote results (pool of 96 voters)
81 responses (84% response ratio)
76 yes, 4 no (95% approval ratio)
1 abstain (1% abstain ratio)
88 comments from 5 commenters
27 marked as MBS
Comment resolution database worksheet:
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

13. 802.15.3e Ballot History 86 yes, 0 no (100% approval ratio)
November 2016
e Ballot History
Sponsor Ballot Recirc 2: (P e/D06)
Opened: 27-Oct-2016
Closed: 6-Nov-2016
Vote results (pool of 96 voters)
87 responses (90% response ratio)
86 yes, 0 no (100% approval ratio)
1 abstain (1% abstain ratio)
26 comments from 3 commenters
0 marked as MBS
Comment resolution database worksheet:
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

14. Why Recirc 3? D06 has 100% approval and 26 comments (non MSB)
November 2016
Why Recirc 3?
D06 has 100% approval and 26 comments (non MSB)
TG3e decided to accept or revise 24 of these comments for the following reasons:
The draft will be substantially improved
All comments are corrections, not changes in functionality or features
The commenters agreed to work closely with the TG to make sure all comments are satisfied
There is minimal risk to the schedule
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

15. Anticipated Schedule Sponsor Ballot Recirc 3: (P802.15.3e/D07)
November 2016
Anticipated Schedule
Sponsor Ballot Recirc 3: (P e/D07)
Open: 25 Nov 2016
Close: 5 Dec 2016
Recirc 4 (P e/D07, if necessary)
Open: 8 Dec 2016
Close: 18 Dec 2016
RevCom Submission
20 Dec 2016
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

16. Motion to Forward 15.3e to RevCom
November 2016
Motion to Forward 15.3e to RevCom
Motion: WG has reviewed and approves the CSD [ e] and requests conditional approval from the EC to submit P e/D07(or current revision) to RevCom.
(WG vote: TBD)
Move: Heile
Second: Gilb
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

17. 802.15.4t Higher Rate (2mb/s) PHY to RevCom (conditional)
November 2016
t Higher Rate (2mb/s) PHY to RevCom (conditional)
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

18. 802.15.4t Ballot History 52 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio) 0 abstain
November 2016
t Ballot History
Initial Sponsor Ballot (P t-D04)
Opened: 08-Sep-2016
Closed: 08-Oct-2016
Vote results (pool of 65 voters)
53 responses (81% response ratio)
52 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio)
0 abstain
25 comments from 5 commenters
1 marked as MBS
Comment resolution database worksheet:
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

19. 802.15.4t Ballot History 53 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio) 0 abstain
November 2016
t Ballot History
Sponsor Ballot Recirc 1: (P t-D05)
Opened: 28-Oct-2016
Closed: 07-Nov-2016
Vote results (pool of 65 voters)
54 responses (83% response ratio)
53 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio)
0 abstain
5 comments from 2 commenters
3 marked as MBS
Comment resolution database worksheet:
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

20. Comments Supporting No Votes
November 2016
Comments Supporting No Votes
The 2 non MBS comments
1 from IEEE Staff indicating all editorial requirements had been met
1 editorial suggestion which was rejected
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

21. Summary of the Remaining 3 MBS Comments from One “No” Voter
November 2016
Summary of the Remaining 3 MBS Comments from One “No” Voter
r-01-2
Comment: macPHYDetect has no meaning
Proposed Change: Remove the sentence “This primitive may only be issued if macPhyDetect is set to O-QPSK_PHY.”
r-01-3
Proposed Change: Remove whole section 8.4 including and the table 8-8
r-01-4
Proposed Change: Remove the text “the value of macPhyDetect shall be set to O-QPSK_PHY, ”
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

22. Summary of the remaining 3 MBS comments from one “No” voter
November 2016
Summary of the remaining 3 MBS comments from one “No” voter
Disposition of these comments is still under discussion.
Regardless, given the nature of the comments, it is felt the balloting can be completed in one (possibly two) more recirculations
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

23. Anticipated Schedule Sponsor Ballot Recirc 2: (P802.15.4t-D05)
November 2016
Anticipated Schedule
Sponsor Ballot Recirc 2: (P t-D05)
Open: 25 Nov 2016
Close: 5 Dec 2016
Recirc 3 (P t-D05, if necessary)
Open: 8 Dec 2016
Close: 18 Dec 2016
RevCom Submission
20 Dec 2016
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

24. Motion to Forward 15.4t to RevCom
November 2016
Motion to Forward 15.4t to RevCom
Motion: WG has reviewed and approves the CSD [ ] and requests conditional approval from the EC to submit P t-D05 (or current revision) to RevCom.
(WG vote: TBD)
Move: Heile
Second: Gilb
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

25. 802.15.10 Layer 2 Routing to RevCom (unconditional)
November 2016
Layer 2 Routing to RevCom (unconditional)
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

26. 802.15.10 Ballot History 76 yes, 3 no (96% approval ratio)
November 2016
Ballot History
Initial Sponsor Ballot (P /D06)
Opened: 13-June-2016
Closed: 13-July-2016
Vote results (pool of 111 voters)
84 responses (75% response ratio)
76 yes, 3 no (96% approval ratio)
5 abstain (5% abstain ratio)
136 comments from 7 commenters
53 marked as MBS
Comment resolution database worksheet:
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

27. 802.15.10 Ballot History 77 yes, 2 no (97% approval ratio)
November 2016
Ballot History
Sponsor Ballot Recirc 1: (P /D07)
Opened: 31-Aug-2016
Closed: 10-Sep-2016
Vote results (pool of 111 voters)
85 responses (76% response ratio)
77 yes, 2 no (97% approval ratio)
6 abstain (7% abstain ratio)
56 comments from 5 commenters
2 marked as MBS
Comment resolution database worksheet:
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

28. 802.15.10 Ballot History 81 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio)
November 2016
Ballot History
Sponsor Ballot Recirc 2: (P /D08)
Opened: 23-Sep-2016
Closed: 3-Oct-2016
Vote results (pool of 111 voters)
88 responses (79% response ratio)
81 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio)
6 abstain (6% abstain ratio)
8 comments from 3 commenters
1 marked as MBS
7 other
Comment resolution database worksheet:
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

29. 802.15.10 Ballot History 83 yes, 0 no (100% approval ratio)
November 2016
Ballot History
Sponsor Ballot Recirc 3: (P /D09)
Opened: 12-Oct-2016
Closed: 22-Oct-2016
Vote results (pool of 111 voters)
89 responses (80% response ratio)
83 yes, 0 no (100% approval ratio)
6 abstain (6% abstain ratio)
2 comments from 1 commenter
1 other
Comment resolution database worksheet:
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

30. 802.15.10 Ballot History 86 yes, 0 no (100% approval ratio)
November 2016
Ballot History
Sponsor Ballot Recirc 4: (P /D10)
Opened: 27-Oct-2016
Closed: 6-Nov-2016
Vote results (pool of 111 voters)
93 responses (83% response ratio)
86 yes, 0 no (100% approval ratio)
7 abstain (7% abstain ratio)
0 comments from 0 commenters
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

31. Motion to Forward 802.15.10 to RevCom
November 2016
Motion to Forward to RevCom
Motion: WG has reviewed and approves the CSD [ ] and requests unconditional approval from the EC to submit P /D10 to RevCom.
(WG vote: 33,0,0)
Move: Heile
Second: Gilb
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

32. 802.15.4v Regional Sub-GHz PHYs to Sponsor Ballot (conditional)
November 2016
v Regional Sub-GHz PHYs to Sponsor Ballot (conditional)
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

33. 802.15.4v Ballot History 55 yes, 2 no (96% approval ratio)
November 2016
v Ballot History
Initial Letter Ballot (P v/D01)
Opened: 11-Aug-2016
Closed: 10-Sep-2016
Vote results (pool of 96 voters)
62 responses (65% response ratio)
55 yes, 2 no (96% approval ratio)
5 abstain (8% abstain ratio)
46 comments from 8 commenters
31 marked as MBS
Comment resolution database worksheet:
– sheet LB127_Comments
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

34. 802.15.4v Ballot History 56 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio)
November 2016
v Ballot History
Letter Ballot Recirc 1: (P v/D02)
Opened: 15-Sep-2016
Closed: 30-Sep-2016
Vote results (pool of 96 voters)
62 responses (65% response ratio)
56 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio)
5 abstain (8% abstain ratio)
9 comments from 2 commenters
4 marked as MBS
Comment resolution database worksheet:
– sheet LB129
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

35. 802.15.4v Ballot History Letter Ballot Recirc 2: (P802.15.4v/D03)
November 2016
v Ballot History
Letter Ballot Recirc 2: (P v/D03)
Opened: 23-Oct-2016
Closed: 7-Nov-2016
Vote results (pool of 96 voters)
64 responses (67% response ratio)
58 yes, 1 no (98% approval ratio)
5 abstain (8% abstain ratio)
11 comments from 3 commenters
1 marked as MBS
MBS Comment subsequently withdrawn -> 59 yes, 0 no
Comment resolution database worksheet:
- sheet: LB130
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

36. November 2016
So Why another Recirc?
Vote is now unanimous, but it was felt that addressing the non MBS comments would result in a better standard.
In essence these comments relate to how to make the standard less confusing and easier to understand
Impact to schedule should be minimal to none.
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

37. Anticipated Schedule WG Letter Ballot Recirc 3: (P802.15.4v-D04)
November 2016
Anticipated Schedule
WG Letter Ballot Recirc 3: (P v-D04)
Open: 14 Nov 2016
Close: 30 Nov 2016
Recirc 4 (P v-D04, if necessary)
Open: 3 Dec 2016
Close: 18 Dec 2016
Start Sponsor Ballot (assuming recirc 4 is not needed)
9 Dec 2016 (or sooner)
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN

38. Motion to Forward 802.15.4v to Sponsor Ballot
November 2016
Motion to Forward v to Sponsor Ballot
Motion: WG has reviewed and approved the CSD [ _15.4v-sub-GHz-CSD] and requests conditional approval from the EC to submit P v-D04 (or current revision) to Sponsor Ballot.
(WG vote: TBD)
Move: Heile
Second: Gilb
Bob Heile, Wi-SUN