1. Placement of the LHC BLMIs around TI8 TED (Q9)

2. Placement of the LHC BLMIs downstream the TI8 TED (Q8)

3. Losses on Q9B2 R8 facing the injection line, Closest to the TED
Q9 beside TI8 dump
? At ~17:00
1st pulse 14:05
last pulse 22:19
TT40 BCT
Intensity [10E10]

4. Losses on Q9B2 R8 facing the injection line, Closest to the TED – ZOOM at the first injections
Q9 beside TI8 dump
TT40 BCT
Intensity [10E10]

5. First Beam Induced radiation seen by the INSTALLED LHC BLM system
Q9 #3 beside TI8 dump
Q8 #3 downstream TI8 dump

6. Q9B2 compared to the Q8B2 (more noise)
Q9 beside TI8 dump
2.4 uGy/shot
Q8 downstream TI8 dump
0.4 uGy/shot

7. Losses on Q9B2 R8 facing the injection line, Closest to the TED – ZOOM at 17:00 signal drop
Q9 beside TI8 dump
TI8 BCT
Drop only in TI8 BCT not in TT40 BCT
Intensity [10E10]

8. Losses on Q9B2 R8 facing the injection line closest to the TED and Q7B2– ZOOM at 17:00 signal drop
Q9 beside TI8 dump 1.3s integration
Q7 downstream TI8 dump

9. Total dose on Q9 from 1063 shots
D = 51.23Gy/s*40e-6s
D = mGy
Mean dose on Q9
Dm = 1.9 uGy/bunch

10. Q8 B2 (all 3ICs) give 6 times less signal than Q9 3B2
Conclusions
Recorded dose for Q9 B2 (IC#3) up to 2.4uGy/pilot close to the TED (behind wall)
0.06 Gy/s for 40us integration period
Q9 beam1 (IC#1) opposite to IC#3 gives very little signal close to noise level
Q8 B2 (all 3ICs) give 6 times less signal than Q9 3B2
Q7 B2 signal only if partially missed TED?
When TI8 BCT has no signal but TT40 does
No BLMIs on BEAM1 (Except Q9 1B1) give any measurable signal -> everything absorbed in the cryostat