1. Insert installation name
Advanced Lighting Controls for Reducing Energy Use and Cost at DoD Installations
Insert installation name

2. Technology Description
OccuSwitch Wireless is a room-based lighting control system employing dimmable light sources, occupancy and daylight sensors, wireless interconnection, and modular control to provide energy savings through occupancy sensing, dimming, and daylight harvesting.
Dynalite is a distributed control-based, wired networked building- wide lighting control system offering scene settings, personalized dimming, scheduling, occupancy sensing, and daylight harvesting to provide energy savings as well as ambience for different activities.
Hybrid Integrated Lighting and Daylight Control (ILDC) is a combination wireless and wired control solution for building-wide networked system that maximizes the use of daylight while improving visual comfort through integrated control of electric lights and motorized blinds.

3. System architecture of Hybrid ILDC

4. Schematic Diagram of Hybrid ILDC system

5. Schematic Diagram of OccuSwitch Wireless

6. Architecture of Dynalite system

7. How Does It Work
Lighting controls can have a large impact on these areas by reducing wasted lighting energy, reducing cooling loads due to the thermal effects of lighting, and improving occupant satisfaction and productivity.
This can be accomplished by detecting occupancy, harvesting daylight, and exploiting integrated control strategies while enhancing user productivity and comfort.
Furthermore, emerging communications technologies, particularly wireless, will reduce the cost of installing advanced lighting controls into older buildings typical of DoD inventory.

8. How Does It Work Continued
Different building types (barracks, administrative buildings, maintenance shops, etc.) require different lighting conditions at different times for optimum occupant productivity and comfort.
The selection of the best lighting control solution depends upon a number of factors such as building type, location, climate zone and usage profiles.
Three complementary lighting control systems were chosen that together meet different DoD facility requirements.

9. Benefits of the Technology
Reduced lighting demand
The goal was to demonstrate at least a 25% reduction in peak LPD compared to code baseline. The results show 60% savings over code baseline, substantially exceeding the target.
Reduced electrical energy consumption for lighting
Reduced carbon footprint of the lighting system
Reliable system and easy maintenance

10. Technology Success Stories
To demonstrate and quantify the energy savings possible with advanced lighting controls system, Philips in partnership with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories has carried out a demonstration project deploying three lighting control system solutions in three chosen buildings in Fort Irwin, California over a period of nearly two years.
The results have shown 43-78% lighting energy savings relative to a Code Baseline and as much as 15% savings in HVAC loads due to advanced lighting controls.

11. Potential Challenges and Solutions
Some trial and error in terms of sensor placement
Not a big problem since the sensors are easy to move
Regulatory issues
Advanced planning to comply with regulatory requirements will help avoid any delays due to regulatory approvals. Requirements for DoD Information Assurance Certification and Accreditation Process (DIACAP) should be investigated early on.
Establishing the channel for communication
A clear communication channel should be established with the base to communicate any issues, concerns, occupant complaints or system faults back to project team in a timely fashion. Lack of coordination can hold up tasks and caused delays.

12. Sample Financial Considerations
From ESTCP Demonstration:
The three systems performed differently with respect to energy savings as expressed in EUI/carbon footprint reduction, peak lighting power density and cost effectiveness. This is partly due to the differences in the characteristics of the buildings they were deployed in and partly due the energy savings features of the systems.

13. Bottom Line Pros Cons Increased energy efficiency
Reduced lighting demand
Reliable
Easy maintenance
Cons
Access to the building is not always easy to obtain
Sensor placement may require a bit of trial and error

14. Where to Learn more
Mr. Tim Tetreault, ESTCP Energy and Water Program Manager,
SERDP-ESTCP Website,
Mr. Kiran Challapali, POC at Philips Research North America, ,

15. Backup Slides

16. Demonstration Performance Objectives