1. Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: TG4t (Higher Rate) Opening & Closing Report for September 2016
Date Submitted: September 2016
Source: Clint Powell, Powell Wireless Commsulting, LLC
Contact: Clint Powell, Powell Wireless Commsulting, LLC
Voice: ,
Re: TG4t (Higher Rate) Opening & Closing Report for September 2016
Abstract: Opening & Closing Report for the TG4t (Higher Rate) Sessions in
Warsaw
Purpose: Higher Rate
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P
Page 1

2. TG4t OPENING REPORT Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10
----- Meeting Notes (17/01/ :38) -----
Replace 1st paragraph with context for TVWS
Page 2

3. 802.15 TG4t (Higher Rate) Project:
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG4t (Higher Rate)
Project:
Draft a Higher Rate PHY Amendment for
Leadership:
Chair – Clint Powell
Technical Editor – Monique Brown
Secretary – …
----- Meeting Notes (17/01/ :38) -----
Replace 1st paragraph with context for TVWS
Page 3

4. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy.
Participants [Note: Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2]:
“Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents
“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)
The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group
Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged
No duty to perform a patent search

5. Patent Related Links
All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development.
Patent Policy is stated in these sources:
IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws
IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual
Material about the patent policy is available at
If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit
This slide set is available at

6. Call for Potentially Essential Patents
If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance:
Either speak up now or
Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or
Cause an LOA to be submitted

7. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.
Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.
Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.
Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.
Technical considerations remain primary focus
Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets.
Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.
Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object.
See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.

8. Meeting Goals Recap July 802.15 Plenary and Current Status
07/12/10
Meeting Goals
Recap July Plenary and Current Status
Agenda and Mins. Approval
Review Scope
Review LB 125 and LB 128 Results
Re-Establish TG4t BRC
Prepare Motion for Conditional Approval to Proceed to RevCom
Review & Update Timeline
Next Steps
Page 8

9. Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG4t Scope
Scope
This amendment defines a physical layer for IEEE Std current revision, capable of supporting 2 Mb/s data rates, utilizing the MHz band, having backwards-compatibility to, and the same occupied bandwidth as, the present 2450 MHz O-QPSK physical layer, and capable of simple implementation. Target range should be at least 10 meters. This amendment defines modifications to the Medium Access Control (MAC) layer needed to support this new physical layer.
Page 9

10. TG4t LB 125 Results VOTERS 103 VOTED 73 YES 66 ABSTAIN 1 NO 1
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG4t LB 125 Results
VOTERS 103
VOTED 73
YES 66
ABSTAIN 1
NO 1
% VOTERS %
% YES %
% ABSTAIN 8.22%
# COMMENTS 1
There was no noted voting fraud, as no identification was required. The letter ballot was valid and the draft passed the minimum approval level of 75%. The LB 125 consolidated comments were posted in doc. #
Page 10

11. TG4t LB 128 Results VOTERS 103 VOTED 77 YES 70 ABSTAIN 7 NO 0
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG4t LB 128 Results
VOTERS 103
VOTED 77
YES 70
ABSTAIN 7
NO 0
% VOTERS %
% YES %
% ABSTAIN 9.09%
# COMMENTS 3 (editorial – all 3 were withdrawn)
There was no noted voting fraud, as no identification was required. The letter ballot was valid and the draft passed the minimum approval level of 75%. The LB 128 consolidated comments were posted in doc. #
Page 11

12. TG4t CLOSING REPORT Jul 12, 2010 07/12/10
----- Meeting Notes (17/01/ :38) -----
Replace 1st paragraph with context for TVWS
Page 12

13. Meeting Status Recap July 802.15 Plenary and Current Status
07/12/10
Meeting Status
Recap July Plenary and Current Status
Agenda and Mins. Approval
Review Scope
Review LB 125 and LB 128 Results
Re-Establish TG4t BRC
Prepare Motion for Conditional Approval to Proceed to RevCom*
Review & Update Timeline
Next Steps
*Due to initial Sponsor Ballot closing on Oct. 8th, which is after the Oct. 4th EC call, this motion will not be brought to the WG.
Page 13

14. Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
Minutes
Minutes - doc. #
Page 14

15. TG4t Timeline (start dates)
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG4t Timeline (start dates)
Sponsor Ballot Aug. 2016
1st Sponsor Ballot Recirc. Oct. 2016
2nd Sponsor Ballot Recirc.* Oct. 2016
EC Approval Nov. 2016
RevCom Approval Jan. 2017
* If needed
Page 15

16. Looking Forward Between Now and San Antonio Mtg. in Nov.
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
Looking Forward
Between Now and San Antonio Mtg. in Nov.
Close Sponsor Ballot
Initial Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution
1st Sponsor Ballot Recirc.
1st Sponsor Ballot Recirc. Comment Resolution
2nd Sponsor Ballot Recirc. (if needed)
2nd Sponsor Ballot Recirc. Comment Resolution
Page 16

17. Looking Forward (cont’d.)
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
Looking Forward (cont’d.)
At San Antonio Mtg. in Nov.
Seek Approval from EC to submit to RevCom (TBD if Unconditional or Conditional )
After San Antonio Mtg. (in Jan. 2017)
Seek RevCom Approval
Page 17

18. TG4t Motion 1 Motion for Request to WG to Form a TG4t BRC.
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG4t Motion 1
Motion for Request to WG to Form a TG4t BRC.
TG4t requests that WG approve the formation of a Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) for the Sponsor Balloting of the P t/D04 with the following membership: Clint Powell, Henk de Ruijter, Monique Brown, Ed Callaway. The TG4t BRC is authorized to approve comment resolutions and to approve the start of recirculation ballots of P t/D04 on behalf of the WG. Comment resolution on recirculation ballots between sessions will be conducted via reflector and via teleconferences announced to the reflector as per the LMSC 802 WG P&P.
Moved: Henk De Ruijter Second: Charlie Perkins
Discussion: None
Objections: None
Page 18

19. Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG4t Motion 2
Motion for WG to Seek Conditional Approval from EC to move to RevCom.
Motion: TG4t requests that WG review and approve the CSD [ ] and requests conditional approval from the EC to submit P t/D04 (or current revision) to RevCom.
Moved: Henk De Ruijter Second: Charlie Perkins
Discussion: None
Objections: None
***Due to initial Sponsor Ballot closing on Oct. 8th, which is after the Oct. 4th EC call, this motion will not be brought to the WG***
Page 19

20. TG4t Conference Calls Reminder
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG4t Conference Calls Reminder
TG4t Standing Conference Call Info
Day: Wed.
Time: 5PM-6PM Mon. (Pacific)
Conf. #: To Be Sent to TG4t Reflector
Next Call: Wed. 12th, Oct.
Page 20

21. TG4t Motion 1 to WG Motion for WG Approval to Form TG4t BRC.
Jul 12, 2010
07/12/10
TG4t Motion 1 to WG
Motion for WG Approval to Form TG4t BRC.
Move that WG approve the formation of a Ballot Resolution Committee (BRC) for the Sponsor Balloting of the P t/D04 with the following membership: Clint Powell, Henk de Ruijter, Monique Brown, Ed Callaway. The TG4t BRC is authorized to approve comment resolutions and to approve the start of recirculation ballots of P t/D04 on behalf of the WG. Comment resolution on recirculation ballots between sessions will be conducted via reflector and via teleconferences announced to the reflector as per the LMSC 802 WG P&P.
Moved: Clint Powell Second:
Discussion:
Objections:
Page 21