1. Penis reconstruction using three different operative methods
Z.Q. Hu, H. Hyakusoku, J.H. Gao, R. Aoki, R. Ogawa, X. Yan 
British Journal of Plastic Surgery 
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages (June 2005)
DOI: /j.bjps
Copyright © 2005 The British Association of Plastic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
An 18-year-old man with a full penile defect caused by a dog bite. (A) Preoperative view. (B) A lower abdominal fascia flap was designed. Two designs in different directions can be used. (C) Seven days after operation, 50% necrosis was seen in this flap.
British Journal of Plastic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.bjps )
Copyright © 2005 The British Association of Plastic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Another case of necrosis in a penis reconstructed with a lower abdominal fascia flap.
British Journal of Plastic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.bjps )
Copyright © 2005 The British Association of Plastic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
Penis reconstruction using a paraumbilical island flap. (A) Design of flap before operation. (B) Intraoperative view. (C) Three weeks after operation.
British Journal of Plastic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.bjps )
Copyright © 2005 The British Association of Plastic Surgeons Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4
Penis reconstruction using a free forearm flap. (A) A micropenis patient postoperative view. (B) Design of flap. (C) A month after operation. A good stream can be seen.
British Journal of Plastic Surgery  , DOI: ( /j.bjps )
Copyright © 2005 The British Association of Plastic Surgeons Terms and Conditions