1. PAR Review - Meeting Agenda and Comment slides - Vancouver 2017
March 2017
doc.: IEEE /0253r2
March 2017
PAR Review - Meeting Agenda and Comment slides - Vancouver 2017
Date:
Authors:
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

2. Abstract-Snapshot March 13-17, Vancouver, BC, Canada
doc.: IEEE /0253r2
March 2017
Abstract-Snapshot
March 13-17, Vancouver, BC, Canada
PARs under consideration:
802.3ch - Amendment: greater than 1 Gb/s Automotive Ethernet, PAR and CSD
Standard Revision: PAR
f - Amendment extending the millimeter wave Physical Layer (PHY) to use the 64 to 71 GHz spectrum, PAR and CSD
  Standard Revision, PAR
Standard: Multi-Gigabit/s Optical Wireless Communications,  PAR and CSD
Meeting times: Monday PM2, Tuesday AM2, Thursday AM2
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

3. PAR Review SC – March 2017 Chair: Jon Rosdahl
doc.: IEEE /0253r2
March 2017
PAR Review SC – March 2017 Chair: Jon Rosdahl
Draft Agenda:
Monday Agenda:
Welcome
Approve Previous Minutes
Determine order of review
Review PARs/CSD posted for review this week.
Recess
Tuesday Agenda:
Complete review of PARs/CSD and post comments to 802 WGs
Thursday Agenda:
Review Response to Comments
Prepare Report for WG closing plenary
Adjourn
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

4. Motion to Approve Previous Minutes
March 2017
Motion to Approve Previous Minutes
Move to approve doc 11-16/1486r0 < 0PAR-minutes-november-2016-session.docx> as the minutes for PAR Review SC from November 2016 Plenary in San Antonio. Moved: Michael Montemurro 2nd: Andy Scott Results: Unanimous Consent
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

5. March 2017
Par Review Comments
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

6. March 2017
802.3ch - Amendment: greater than 1 Gb/s Automotive Ethernet, PAR and CSD
2.1 Title – Change “Automotive” to Vehicular” or to be consistent, change all the “vehicular” to “automotive” in the PAR. 5.5 Typo “G/bps” should be “Gb/s” 5.5 suggest changing “legacy network” to “legacy vehicular network” Broad Market Potential – first dashed item was initially confusing to naïve readers, may consider adding ““” or “,”
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

7. 802.11 - Standard Revision: PAR
March 2017
Standard Revision: PAR
Did not review.
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

8. March 2017
f - Amendment extending the millimeter wave Physical Layer (PHY) to use the 64 to 71 GHz spectrum, PAR and CSD
4.3: Typically the minimum for the time between 4.2 and 4.3 is 6 months (see instruction notes). Is there justification for the shorter time? If not suggest 6 months minimum. 5.2b/5.5: Is the Channelization plan consistent with existing plan (ITU adopted M )? Concern that deviation from the agreed channel plan will cause bifurcation in the industry. 5.5 Need for the project should indicate the benefit of what the amendment will accomplish. What is the market need for extension of the band?
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

9. March 2017
f PAR
5.2b: Beside channelization, other parameters should be considered, i.e power (EIRP), beam-width. Please include the constraints for parameters for these other parameters. A Suggested change: “This amendment extends the RF channelization of the millimeter wave PHY to allow for use of the spectrum from 64 to 71 GHz, including power and antenna constraints.” 7.1 Similar Scope – please add TGay A General Comment: The current channelization has the last channel at 65Ghz in the standard, are you changing the GHz channels? If not, would changing this to state “65Ghz to 71Ghz”?
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

10. March 2017
f CSD
CSD a) typo “64 Ghz to 7 GHz” should be “64Ghz to 71GHz” CSD a) & b) Channelization – if using the current Channelization plan, the new band should give three additional channels, not two as indicated in the text. CSD Compatibility – “YES” is sufficient, suggest delete the next sentence after “yes”.
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

11. March 2017
f CSD comments
CSD – Distinct Identity: Each proposed IEEE 802 LMSC standard shall provide evidence of a distinct identity. Identify standards and standards projects with similar scopes and for each one describe why the proposed project is substantially different. The CSD response is not response to the Criteria. Please provide evidence of a distinct identity for this project. Include a statement to the effect that no other standardization project including those listed in “7.1 Similar Scope:” from the PAR form modify the Standard to support 64 Ghz to 71Ghz.
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

12. March 2017
f CSD
CSD b) suggested change: Multiple vendors are already producing devices and systems based on IEEE millimeter wave PHYs. These devices and systems are being used in products such as Audio/Visual consumer electronics, mobile devices, laptops, tablets and related peripherals. CSD Typo? Should 66 GHz be 64GHz? CSD – Rather than have several “See a)”, just put one sentence at the end of the “a) - e)” answering all the questions with a single sentence.
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

13. 5.4 typo – change “what in now” to “what is now”
March 2017
doc.: IEEE /0253r2
March 2017
  Standard Revision, PAR
4.2/4.3 dates should be at least 6 months apart.
5.2 adding “and other” seems to change the scope significantly. The change seems to allow any band.
Suggest to delete “and other” from the scope or alternatively identify what are the “other bands”.
5.4 typo – change “what in now” to “what is now”
5.4 Delete “especially” and “now”
Change the new phrase “targeting the communication requirements of what is commonly referred to as the Internet of Things.”
5.5 typo – change “number errors” to “number of errors”
5.5 add “IEEE std” when referring to specific standards
8.1 list the full names of the standards cited in 5.5.
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

14. March 2017
Standard: Multi-Gigabit/s Optical Wireless Communications,  PAR and CSD
1.1 Project Number: The Par Number of is potentially confusing, Please change. Propose Title – why the “/s” at the end of Gigabit? Strictly speaking “Multi- Gigabit” is a size parameter rather than a speed rate. The /s may have meant “per second” but consider replacing “/s” and spell out the per second. Suggested title change to “Multi-Gigabit per second Optical Wireless Communication” 5.2 – Is the scope an overlap with the existing standard? The use of the word Optical seems to confuse this standard with the previous standard. 7.1 include description of differences to similar project
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

15. March 2017
CSD
General CSD Comment: When citing standards, add “IEEE std” throughout CSD.
CSD Distinct Identity,
Consider including some of this to the need statement of the PAR to show the need for the project.
Typo “mutli” should be “multi”
Starting the statement with “With the exception” seems an odd way to start a statement of Distinct Identity. Suggest deleting the phrase.
Add “IEEE std” before when referring to the standard, and add 802 before 15.7 when meaning
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

16. Comments received From 802 WGs on 802.11 Revision PAR (REVmd)
March 2017
Comments received From 802 WGs on Revision PAR (REVmd)
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

17. Comments received on 802.11 Revision (REVmd)
March 2017
Comments received on Revision (REVmd)
James Gilb: I have the following comment on the PAR - NesCom guidelines ask that the full titles of the standards referenced in the PAR are given, typically in section 8.1. While the titles of the in process amendments are given in 8.1, the titles of IEEE ah-2016 and IEEE ai-2016 are not given. Please add these to 8.1 along with the section number (5.5) Response: Agreed, titles added.
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

18. Comments Received on 802.11 Revision (REVmd)
March 2017
doc.: IEEE /0253r2
March 2017
Comments Received on Revision (REVmd)
Paul Nikolich:
My comments on the revision PAR are as follows:
a) 2.1 Title.  Please consider simplifying the Title of the Standard to something along the lines of "Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Standard Specifications"
b) 5.6 Stakeholders.  Please consider adding "wireless network access" to "service providers" yielding "wireless network access service providers".
Response:
The title is still correct, no need to change it.
5.6 Changed “service providers” to “wireless network access service providers”
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

19. Comments Received on 802.11 Revision (REVmd)
March 2017
Comments Received on Revision (REVmd)
802.3 Comments on Revision PAR: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY)
• PAR, 6.1, b) — Std definitely has registration activity (e.g., use of OUI and EUI-48). Possibly the revision has nothing that the RAC hasn’t reviewed before (e.g., the RAC has reviewed for inclusion of CID into the standard). We would suggest checking the box and explaining the scope of RAC review (or why RAC review may not be needed) that might be expected in the revision.
Response: 6.1.b Box will be Checked.
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

20. March 2017
Responses From 802 WGs
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

21. March 2017
Final Report to
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

22. Motion To Approve Report
March 2017
doc.: IEEE /0253r2
March 2017
Motion To Approve Report
Move to accept 11-17/0253rx as the report from PAR Review SC for the March 2017 plenary.
Moved:
2nd:
Results:
This Document
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)

23. References IEEE 802 PARs Under consideration Webpage: Minutes:
March 2017
doc.: IEEE /0253r2
March 2017
References
IEEE 802 PARs Under consideration Webpage:
Minutes:
Previous Plenary: 11-16/1486r0:
< november-2016-session.docx>
Current Meeting: 11-17/xxxxr0
< >
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)
Jon Rosdahl, (Qualcomm)