1. Assessing the value of rubrics in online assessment
- reviewing staff and student perceptions
Gillian Gibson (SHLS)
Ken Garner (GSBS)
Jim Paterson (SEBE)

2. Common features of rubrics:
What is a rubric?
A scoring guide used to evaluate the quality of students' constructed responses
Common features of rubrics:
focus on measuring a stated objective (performance, behaviour, or quality)
use a range to rate performance
contain specific performance characteristics arranged in levels indicating the degree to which a standard has been met

3. 2020 Student Experience Project
Aims of the project
To survey staff to ascertain awareness and use of rubrics in their modules in GCU (3 schools; SHLS, SEBE, GSBS)
To survey students to ascertain their perception of a “good” rubric in terms of feedback
Look at the range of assessment guidelines/rubrics currently used
Catalogue the different types of assessment/marking/ feedback used across the institution
Create a database of rubrics for open access to staff

4. Staff Survey – Key Findings (1)

5. Staff Survey – Key Findings (2)

6. Staff Survey – Key Findings (3)

7. Student Survey – Key Findings (1) (in progress)
Where rubrics/marking schemes are used, do you find these a useful tool?
Where rubrics/marking schemes are used, would you normally have sight of these prior to submitting coursework?

8. Student Survey – Key Findings (2) (in progress)

9. Students were then shown a range of rubrics and asked to select the one they found most useful/informative…

10. Rubric/marking scheme 1
This rubric essentially assesses a final year project involving a detailed thesis and oral presentation

11. Rubric/marking scheme 2
Criteria
Marking Range %
Layout/navigation of display -
Does the poster have a clear title and identifiers for all contributors?
Does the poster have a logical order/layout?
Is there “empty” space?
Is there adequate “space” allocation for important sections?
0-10
Visual Appeal –
Is the font an appropriate size?
Have the diagrams been customised/annotated appropriately?
Is the colour scheme/background appropriate?
Is there a good balance between text/diagrams?
Does the poster look disjointed, i.e. evidence suggestive of non-coherent group work?
Specific content –
Does the poster adequately cover the topic?
Is the introduction 200 words (+/-10%)?
Is there evidence of wider reading; recent developments in research/novel therapies, e.g.?
Is there a conclusion/summary?
Are references included and cited correctly (including within diagrams/figure legends)?
Are figure legends present and correct?
Total
/30
This rubric assesses a group poster at level 3

12. Rubric/marking scheme 3
This rubric is fairly general and is designed to evaluate critical thinking across a range of coursework formats

13. Rubric/marking scheme 4
The rubric assesses group work in a generic task

14. Rubric/marking scheme 5…

15. Which one do you think they selected?

16. Intended outcomes/impact
The key outputs will be:
database of assessment practices across the University
report on the efficacy of these practices
recommendations for addenda to existing policy to encourage and facilitate the use of rubrics in a robust manner
Robust rubrics are shown to save staff time, alleviating workload pressures
Students will benefit from more robust assessment and feedback processes
Impact will be measureable in terms of improvement to evaluation in the NSS, ISB and other GCU surveys

17. Selected quotes
“I mark online using rubrics in GCU Learn – I can have the coursework and rubrics on screen together or over 2 screens. I can release marks to all students who can reflect on where they gained marks against the marking scheme. Feedback can be general or individualised on the rubrics. When there are other module tutors, this method has been used effectively and moderation can be done of each other’s marks. It saves so much paperwork too!”
“The use of a rubric this session for one of my modules reduced my coursework marking time from 45 to 30 minutes. A 33% reduction in marking time. In addition to this, feedback to students was more detailed and enhanced significantly.”
"I Iead a module taught in Glasgow across two programmes and one programme in London. A rubric was adopted to ensure consistency of marking across campus and amongst staff which it did. Further benefits included being able to see how marking was progressing across the team and as Module Leader how marks were fairing. The added benefit of not having to mark sheets and assessments further enhanced the use of a rubric."

18. Thank you.