Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Ridgefield Public Schools 2017/2018 data presentation

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Ridgefield Public Schools 2017/2018 data presentation"— Presentation transcript:

1 Ridgefield Public Schools 2017/2018 data presentation
October 2018

2 Assess Students’ Progress Toward Meeting Standards
But also in 2008, the High School Redesign Taskforce courageously stated that New Jersey’s old high school assessment – the High School Proficiency Assessment or HSPA – wasn’t measuring college or career readiness. And that it was all but ignored by colleges.

3 Changes to State Testing
Governor Phil Murphy has called on the New Jersey Department of Education (NJDOE) to transition away from the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and to improve upon New Jersey’s system of statewide assessments. The following are the first priorities for changes in standardized testing in New Jersey. Reducing the amount of statewide testing in high school; Reducing the length of the test; Keeping our standards and assessment questions that require critical thinking; Making sure any changes are communicated clearly and with time for smooth implementation and professional development; Appreciation for keeping parents and teachers engaged in the process of the transition; and Reducing the weight in educator evaluation.

4 Graduation requirements
Under state law, New Jersey’s graduating high school classes have multiple pathways to meet graduation assessment requirements. In addition to the graduation pathways described below, districts may utilize the NJDOE’s portfolio appeals process for any student. Special Education students, whose Individualized Education Plans (IEPs) specify an alternative way to demonstrate proficiencies, follow the graduation requirements set forth in their IEPs: Classes of 2018 and 2019: Students can meet graduation assessment requirements by: (1) achieving passing scores on high school level PARCC assessments; (2) achieving passing scores on alternative assessments such as the SAT, ACT, or Accuplacer; (3) utilizing the NJDOE’s portfolio appeals process. Class of 2020: Students can meet graduation assessment requirements by: (1) passing the PARCC Algebra I and/or English language arts/literacy (ELA) grade 10 assessments; (2) sitting for all applicable PARCC assessments and achieve a passing score on an alternative assessment in ELA and/or math (options include the SAT, ACT, or Accuplacer, PARCC ELA 9, ELA 11, Geometry, or Algebra II); (3) utilizing the portfolio appeals process. Classes of 2021 and Beyond: Requirements are under review by the New Jersey Department of Education. But also in 2008, the High School Redesign Taskforce courageously stated that New Jersey’s old high school assessment – the High School Proficiency Assessment or HSPA – wasn’t measuring college or career readiness. And that it was all but ignored by colleges.

5 PARCC Performance levels
Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations In PARCC, student outcomes are divided into five performance levels. Level One describes student work in the assessment that does not yet meeting the grade-level expectations or the course expectations. Level Two describes student work that is partially meeting grade-level expectations. Level Three describes student work that is approaching grade-level expectations. Level Four describes work that meets grade-level expectations. Level Five describes work that exceeds grade-level expectations. It’s important to recognize however that while PARCC is a meaningful assessment of student learning that provides useful information about a student, that New Jersey has been and remains committed to using multiple metrics in assessing student progress and attainment. Decisions about student placement in the next grade level or course have always been made by school districts and should always be fully informed by multiple sources of information, including teacher recommendations and parent input.

6 Score Reports Statewide scores by topic area
District scores by grade level and topic area Comparison of same group of students from 15/16 , 16/17 to 17/18 on PARCC testing. Subgroup scores Participation percentages District Factor Groups (DFGs) were first introduced in 1975 for the purpose of comparing students’ performance on statewide assessments across demographically similar school districts. The categories are updated every 10 years when the Census Bureau releases the latest data. The last update was done in Franklin Lakes is in a District Factor Group of I. Other I towns are Oakland, Wyckoff, Tenafly, Ramsey, Montvale, etc. As you can see, the criteria for determining a district factor group focuses on the exposure to and value for education.

7 Grade 3 English Language Arts

8 Grade 3 Mathematics

9 Grade 4 English Language Arts

10 Grade 4 Mathematics

11 Grade 5 English Language Arts

12 Grade 5 Mathematics

13 Grade 6 English Language Arts

14 Grade 6 Mathematics

15 Grade 7 English Language Arts

16 Grade 7 Mathematics

17 Grade 8 English Language Arts

18 Grade 8 Mathematics

19 Grade 9 English Language Arts

20 Algebra 1 Assessment

21 Grade 10 English Language Arts

22 Algebra 2 Assessment

23 Grade 11 English Language Arts

24 Geometry Assessment

25 NJSLS – Science Field Test
The New Jersey Student Learning Assessment for Science (NJSLA-S) measures student proficiency with the New Jersey Student Learning Standards for Science. The science standards require assessment tasks that examine students’ performance of scientific and engineering practices in the context of crosscutting concepts and disciplinary core ideas. The three-dimensional nature of the standards requires more complex assessment items and tasks. The NJSLA are only one component of a system of assessments that provide evidence about student learning. The data collected from the NJSLA-S, students’ interactions with teachers on a daily basis, and their subsequent performance on teacher and district developed assessments combine to provide a clear and well-rounded picture of students’ achievement. The science test in being field tested and results will be posted in future administrations.

26 Ridgefield 17/18 Spring PARCC Administrations ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY (percentage passing scores of 4 and 5) GR 3 GR 4 GR 5 GR 6 GR 7 GR 8 GR 9 GR 10 GR 11 Hispanic 48 51 16 62 4 15 42 39 38 21 41 27 35 22 Asian 49 40 66 20 55 24 46 50 30 23 White 59 61 19 36 54 14 17 Student w/ Disability 11 25 7 13 ELL 33 44 Econom Disadv 47 18 65 6 45 56 43 28

27 Ridgefield 17/18 Spring PARCC Administrations Mathematics (percentage passing scores of 4 and 5)
GR 3 GR 4 GR 5 GR 6 GR 7 GR 8 ALG 1 ALG 2 GEO Hispanic 55 3 43 2 36 11 42 13 48 32 29 23 Asian 60 24 63 17 51 37 33 30 15 79 9 White 52 47 19 56 14 54 41 21 ELL 20 Student w/ Disabili 50 16 5 38 25 7 Econom Disadv 64 4 18 12 61

28 Number of Students Tested
ridgefield Students Tested Spring 2016 and Spring 2017 and Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Number of Students Tested 2016 2017 2018 Grade 3 114 115 85 Grade 4 118 126 Grade 5 100 119 117 Grade 6 102 95 Grade 7 101 94 Grade 8 104 Grade 9 99 Grade 10 123 Grade 11 116 122 129 Algebra 1 138 154 Algebra 2 80 71 98 Geometry 103 127 TOTAL 1327 1360 1333

29 Dynamic Learning Management (DLM)
DLM is the alternate assessment for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities. NJ uses the DLM Year-End (YE) model in English language arts, mathematics, and science. The NJ Fall Training materials provide a description of the tested population and participation criteria that determine who is eligible to take the NJ DLM test. Paperwork will be completed by the IEP team to document the eligibility of students. Students scores in four ranges: Emerging in ability to apply content knowledge and skills Approaching in ability to apply content knowledge to meet targets At target in ability to meet knowledge and skills represented by Essential Elements Advanced in ability at grade level Essential Elements

30 DLM % Students in each category Math

31 Access for ELLs 2.0 Access for ELLs is an English language proficiency test for Grades K – 12. The test measures the English language development of students identified as English Language Learners (ELL) Proficiency level scores range from 1.0 – 6.0, with the score of 4.5 and above considered proficient.

32 Access for ELLs 2.0 Grades K - 12
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Proficient 42% 18% 44% 45% 0% 20% 50% 29% Partially 58% 82% 56% 55% 100% 80% 71% A score of 4.5 or above is considered one of the exit criteria for a student to graduate from ELL services. The recommended, average length for a student to receive ELL services is five years

33 AP SCORES Mean Score 2017 % 3 or higher 2018 % 3 or higher Biology
3.14 91.6% 85.7% Calculus AB 3.73 87.5% 100% Calculus BC 3.00 Music Theory N/A 50% English Lit 3.06 57.1% 93.3% European History 4.00 71.4% Physics 1 1.78 0% 22% Psychology 3.26 75% 74% Spanish Lang 5.00 Statistics 3.58 66.7% 83% US History 3.57 89.5% 76.1%

34 AP SCORES COMPARISON Ridgefield Mean Score NJ Mean Score US Mean Score
Ridgefield % 3 or higher NJ % 3 or higher US % 3 or higher Biology 3.14 3.17 2.89 91.6% 74.7% 64.1% Calculus AB 3.73 3.32 2.91 87.5% 68.9% 57.6% Calculus BC 3.00 4.10 3.78 100% 88.3% 80.6% Music Theory 2.99 2.63 50% 62.3% 52.5% English Lit 3.06 2.97 2.68 57.1% 64.0% 52.6% European History 4.00 3.11 2.81 71.4% 67.1% 56.1% Physics 1 1.78 2.58 2.36 22% 47.7% 41.8% Psychology 3.26 3.27 3.05 75% 69.9% 64.2% Spanish Language 5.00 3.72 3.58 90.1% 87.9% Statistics 2.75 66.7% 68.4% 54.2% US History 3.57 3.10 2.64 89.5% 65.6% 50.1% Total 3.20 2.84 70.9% 57.5%

35 % OF STUDENTS SCORING 3 OR HIGHER
5 YEAR AP DATA % OF STUDENTS SCORING 3 OR HIGHER

36 NUMBER OF RIDGEFIELD STUDENTS TESTING
5 YEAR AP DATA NUMBER OF RIDGEFIELD STUDENTS TESTING

37 Evidence-Based Reading and Writing
SAT DATA – CLASS OF 2018 Evidence-Based Reading and Writing Math Total Score Reading (Essay) Analysis Writing (Essay) Ridgefield - 99 Tests Essay - 62 535 545 1080 5 4 6 Male 45 Ridgefield Students 521 555 1076 3 Female 54 Ridgefield Students 546 537 1083 The SAT is scored on a scale of 200 – 800 2 students scored 700 or more on the ERW section – High Score: 730 7 students scored 700 or more on the Mathematics section – High Score: 800 Essay is scored on a scale of 2-8 34 students scored 6 or more on the Reading section – High Score: 8 6 students scored 6 or more on the Analysis section – High Score: 6 43 students scored 6 or more on the Writing section – High Score: 8

38 HISTORICAL SAT DATA Critical Reading and Writing 2015 2016 2017 2018
Ridgefield 491 481 556 535 NJ 500 495 539 Total Group 494 538

39 HISTORICAL SAT DATA Mathematics 2015 2016 2017 2018 535 500 561 545
Ridgefield 535 500 561 545 NJ 521 514 537 Total Group 511 508 533 HISTORICAL SAT DATA

40 Other Colleges Attended
Class of 2018 Post-High School Data 120 Students Four-Year College: 77 (64%) Two-Year College: (26%) Armed Forces: (1%) FT Employment: (6%) Other: (3%) 31 students attend Bergen Community College 16 students attend Rutgers University 15 students attend Montclair State University 4 students attend Ramapo 3 students attend FDU 3 students attend Caldwell College 4 students attend Seton Hall University Other Colleges Attended NJIT Rowan University Sacred Heart Steven’s Institute of Technology Culinary Institute of America College of NJ Saint Peter’s University University of Rhode Island Villanova University Utah State University Lafayette College Hunter College Iona College


Download ppt "Ridgefield Public Schools 2017/2018 data presentation"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google