1. Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
January 2011
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: HIPIG Agenda LAX 2011
Date Submitted: January 17, 2011
Source: Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
Address 1000 Bent Creek Blvd, MechanicsBurg, PA, USA
Voice:+1 (248) ,
Re: HIP IG Opening Report for January 2011 Session
Abstract: Opening report for the HIP IG Session.
Purpose: To focus activities during the meeting
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

2. HIPIG Agenda / Opening Report
January 2011
HIPIG Agenda / Opening Report
Los Angeles
January 20, 2011
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

3. Abstract To provide for a Key Management Protocol for 802.15.4
January 2011
Abstract
To provide for a Key Management Protocol for
Minimally to support HIP
Allow for other KMPs
To present use scenarios and how a KMP facilitates security in those scenarios.
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

4. January 2011
Meeting Protocol
Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

5. Attendance Register Indicate attendance January 2011
Register
Indicate attendance

6. Attendance Indicate attendance Register January 2011
Register
Indicate attendance

7. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
January 2011
All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants:
“Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents
“Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims
“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)
The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group
Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2
Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged
No duty to perform a patent search
Slide 7
Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.) 7

8. Patent Related Links Slide 8 Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.)
January 2011
All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE- SA Policies & Procedures for standards development.
Patent Policy is stated in these sources:
IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws
IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual
Material about the patent policy is available at
If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit
This slide set is available at
Slide 8
Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.)

9. Call for Potentially Essential Patents
January 2011
If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance:
Either speak up now or
Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or
Cause an LOA to be submitted
Slide 9
Hiroshi Mano (Root Inc.)

10. Goals Produce a Recommended Practice Dependencies
January 2011
Goals
Produce a Recommended Practice
Use 'existing' frames to carry KMP
Avoid long time line for amendment
Dependencies
TG4e Information Elements
? TG4g large datagrams
Else need chaining of IEs across datagrams

11. Discussion Base scenario – Static star, KMP at join
January 2011
Discussion
Base scenario – Static star, KMP at join
What frames carry KMP?
Assume IEs via 4e
What frames carry KMP updates?
End to End KMP?
Mesh via multiple controllers

12. Discussion Information Elements How many IE IDs needed?
January 2011
Discussion
Information Elements
How many IE IDs needed?
What is max size of value pre 4g?
What is max size post 4g?
How to support chaining
IE format for support
Frame flow for support

13. Discussion Information Elements Other points to discuss Value format
January 2011
Discussion
Information Elements
Value format
If KMP designed on IP (e.g. IKE & HIP) start with IP protocol # ?
Other points to discuss

14. Next Steps How to prepare text for next session Singapore?
January 2011
Next Steps
How to prepare text for next session
Singapore?
Scenario text
Other?