1. Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
September 2011
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: KMPIG Agenda Okinawa 2011
Date Submitted: September 19, 2011
Source: Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
Address 1000 Bent Creek Blvd, MechanicsBurg, PA, USA
Voice:+1 (248) ,
Re: KMP IG Opening Report for September 2011 Session
Abstract: Opening report for the KMP IG Session.
Purpose: To focus activities during the meeting
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

2. KMPIG Agenda / Opening Report
September 2011
KMPIG Agenda / Opening Report
Okinawa
September 19, 2011
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

3. Abstract To provide for a Key Management Protocol for 802.15.4
September 2011
Abstract
To provide for a Key Management Protocol for
Be KMP agnostic
Provide guidelines for specific KMPs like HIP, 802.1X, and IKEv2
To present use scenarios and how a KMP facilitates security in those scenarios.
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

4. September 2011
Meeting Protocol
Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

5. Attendance Register Indicate attendance September 2011
Register
Indicate attendance
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

6. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
September 2011
All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants:
“Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents
“Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims
“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)
The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group
Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2
Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged
No duty to perform a patent search
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

7. Patent Related Links September 2011 Robert Moskowitz, Verizon
All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development.
Patent Policy is stated in these sources:
IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws
IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual
Material about the patent policy is available at
If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit
This slide set is available at
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

8. Call for Potentially Essential Patents
September 2011
Call for Potentially Essential Patents
If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance:
Either speak up now or
Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or
Cause an LOA to be submitted
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

9. Minutes Review and vote on July 2011 minutes
September 2011
Minutes
Review and vote on July 2011 minutes
hip-hipig-minutes-for-july doc
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

10. Goals Produce a Recommended Practice Dependencies
September 2011
Goals
Produce a Recommended Practice
Use 'existing' frames to carry KMP
Avoid long time line for amendment
Dependencies
TGi,
TG4e Information Elements

11. September 2011
Patents
Certicom has submitted IPR on IETF ID 5201-bis (HIP- BEX):
One claim has been addressed in latest draft. Do not know of impact on HIP DEX
Robert Moskowitz, Verizon

12. Discussion Base scenario – Static star, KMP at join
September 2011
Discussion
Base scenario – Static star, KMP at join
What frames carry KMP?
Assume IEs via 4e
BEACON PANs – ASSOCIATE
BEACONLESS – DATA
What frames carry KMP updates?
End to End KMP?

13. Discussion Mesh via multiple controllers End to End KMP?
September 2011
Discussion
Mesh via multiple controllers
End to End KMP?
Only deal with 1st hop as multiple controller PANs will have higher layer transport in place already

14. Discussion Information Elements How many IE IDs needed?
September 2011
Discussion
Information Elements
How many IE IDs needed?
One! If only one IE per packet
What is max size of value pre 4g?
What is max size post 4g?
How to support chaining
IE format for support
Frame flow for support
Use of forced ACKs

15. Discussion Information Elements Other points to discuss
September 2011
Discussion
Information Elements
Managing retransmissions
Missed ACKs?
Value format
If KMP designed on IP (e.g. IKE & HIP) start with IP protocol # ?
Other points to discuss

16. September 2011
PAR
kmp-Key-Management-Protocol-PAR.doc
Can a single recommended practice by applied to 15.4, 15.6, and 15.7?
Separate documents?
Special text for differences for each?
What will be concerns of other groups?
How to ensure November approval?

17. September 2011
Next Steps
How to prepare text for next session ?