1. Informatics 121 Software Design I
Lecture 16 André van der Hoek & Alex Baker
Duplication of course material for any commercial purpose without the explicit written permission of the professor is prohibited.
February 28, 2019 – 00:55:27
© 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

2. © 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Today’s Lecture
Design Studio II reflection
Will politely ask people to gather into groups of 3 quickly
February 28, 2019 – 00:55:27
© 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

3. © 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Reflection
Where lies the essence of this design problem?
When did you realize this?
February 28, 2019 – 00:55:27
© 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

4. © 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Reflection
Where lie some other potentially difficult issues to be addressed?
When did you realize this?
February 28, 2019 – 00:55:27
© 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

5. © 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Reflection
Who are the stakeholders?
How did you determine this?
Did you leave any potential stakeholders out? Why?
February 28, 2019 – 00:55:27
© 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

6. © 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Reflection
How did you scope the anticipated goals and uses for this system?
Any specific criteria you used consistently?
February 28, 2019 – 00:55:27
© 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

7. © 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Reflection
How many alternative designs did you create?
Why?
What different strengths/weaknesses did these alternative designs have?
How difficult was it to think of these alternative designs?
February 28, 2019 – 00:55:27
© 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

8. © 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Reflection
How did you map alternative designs to anticipated stakeholder experiences?
Does your final design address all stakeholder concerns?
Does your final design address all stakeholder concerns equally well?
February 28, 2019 – 00:55:27
© 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

9. © 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Reflection
What process did you use to bring the alternative designs together?
Is this process visible in your design history?
February 28, 2019 – 00:55:27
© 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

10. © 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Reflection
What was the effect of keeping track of your decisions?
Help?
Hinder?
February 28, 2019 – 00:55:27
© 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

11. © 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Reflection
What was the effect of having to create this design on your own, as opposed to in a team?
February 28, 2019 – 00:55:27
© 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

12. © 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Reflection
What was the effect of the shorter time line?
February 28, 2019 – 00:55:27
© 2009 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek