1. Evaluation of Project Events Pilot: Kick-off meeting in Seville
The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects
the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsi­ble for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

2. Dates: 25 April - 9 May Scale: 1-4 Responses: 15* Response rate: 55%
*2 discarded as related to a different event
1: Not at all
2: To a small degree N
3: To a large degree
4: Completely Y
The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects
the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsi­ble for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

3. A. Structure Were the goals of the event clear? (Y93%)
Was the event structure clear? (Y87%)
Were you given an opportunity to contribute to the structure of the event? (Y93%)
To what extent have the goals been achieved? (Y93%)
Was there a good range and balance of activities? (Y100%)
To what extent have participants contributed to the discussion and decision making? (Y93%)
The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects
the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsi­ble for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

4. B. Organisation
Was the communication satisfactory before the event? (Y87%)
Was the organisation satisfactory during the event? (Y93%)
Was there a clear and reasonable timetable in place? (Y100%)
Did the event adhere to the agenda? (Y93%)
The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects
the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsi­ble for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

5. C. Environment and Resources
Was the working environment satisfactory? (Y100%)
Was the provision of materials, resources and equipment suitable? (Y100%)
Please rate each element of the domestic arrangements:
Meeting rooms (Y93%)
Social events (Y100%)
Catering (Y93%)
The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects
the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsi­ble for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

6. 14. How can any of the above be improved?
To provide organized coffee-breaks.
The organizers provided good balance of events and their organization so all the goals were reached. Good provision of environment and resources allowed all the participants stick to meeting activities and discussions.
Financial and reporting issues to be discussed more.
The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects
the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsi­ble for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

7. D. Evaluation Form How useful do you find this form? (Y93%)
How would you rate its structure? (Y100%)
How would you rate the online platform used for generating the evaluation form? (Y100%)
How can this form be improved?
Something about the results and timetable of the event
The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects
the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsi­ble for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.