Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hanna Yang, Dorota Jarosinska, Roman Perez Velasco

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Hanna Yang, Dorota Jarosinska, Roman Perez Velasco"— Presentation transcript:

1 WHO work on air quality and health, focusing on the update of the global Air Quality Guidelines
Hanna Yang, Dorota Jarosinska, Roman Perez Velasco WHO European Centre for Environment and Health 22nd EIONET Workshop on Air Quality Assessment and Management Lisbon, Portugal, 3rd and 4th October, 2017

2 Presentation Outline WHO ECEH work on AQ
Existing WHO Air Quality Guidelines Background for update of guidelines WHO Guideline development process and scope of updated guidelines

3 WHO ECEH work on AQ

4 The WHO European Region
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health 53 Member States: pop. 4

5 WHO ECEH work on AQ and health
Reviewing the scientific evidence and providing guidance : WHO Air Quality guideline Developing tool to assess health risk attributable to air pollution : Air Q+ Provide advice to the UNECE Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution : leading the Joint Task Force on Health Aspects of Air Pollution

6 Existing WHO Air Quality Guidelines

7 WHO Air Quality Guidelines
Ambient air quality guidelines AQG for Europe (1987) AQG for Europe, 2nd Edition (2000) AQG, Global Update 2005 (2006) AQG global update (since 2016) Indoor air quality guidelines Dampness and mould (2009) Selected chemical pollutants (2010) Household fuel combustion (2014)

8 Air pollutants covered
INORGANIC 2000 Acrylonitrile* Benzene Butadiene Carbon disulfide* Carbon monoxide 1,2-Dichloroethane* Dichloromethane Formaldehyde Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Polychlorinated biphenyls Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans Styrene Tetrachloroethylene Toluene Trichloroethylene Vinyl chloride Arsenic Asbestos* Cadmium Chromium Fluoride Hydrogen sulfide Lead Manganese Mercury Nickel Platinum Vanadium Nitrogen dioxide Ozone Particulate matter Sulfur dioxide Radon Environmental tobacco smoke Man-made vitreous fibres ORGANIC CLASSICAL INDOOR * Not re-evaluated (1987 evaluation retained) Acrylonitrile Benzene Carbon disulfide 1,2-Dichloroethane Dichloromethane Formaldehyde Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons Styrene Tetrachloroethylene Toluene Trichloroethylene Vinyl chloride Arsenic Asbestos Cadmium Carbon monoxide Chromium Hydrogen sulfide Lead Manganese Mercury Nickel Nitrogen dioxide Ozone Radon Sulfur dioxide and particulate matter Vanadium 1987 ORGANIC INORGANIC 2005 Particulate matter Ozone Nitrogen dioxide Sulfur dioxide

9 WHO AQG Global Update (2005): Summary
Pollutant Averaging time AQG value Particulate matter PM2.5 PM10 1 year 24 hour (99th percentile) 10 µg/m3 25 µg/m3 20 µg/m3 50 µg/m3 Ozone, O3 8 hour, daily maximum 100 µg/m3 Nitrogen dioxide, NO2 1 hour 40 µg/m3 200 µg/m3 Sulfur dioxide, SO2 24 hour 10 minute 500 µg/m3 Levels recommended to be achieved everywhere in order to significantly reduce the adverse health effects of pollution

10 WHO Air Quality Guidelines (AQG)
The most widely accepted set of public health recommendations, intended to assist policy-makers, health-care providers, and other relevant stakeholders to make informed decisions to protect public health from the adverse effects of air pollution Based on a comprehensive and objective assessment of the available evidence Intended for worldwide use, therefore recognize the heterogeneity of technological feasibility, economic development and other political and economical factors

11 WHO AQG addressed mainly to…
Decision/policy-makers and technical experts responsible for developing and implementing regulations and standards for environmental health, air pollution control, urban planning and others Other stakeholders, including non-governmental organizations and advocacy groups - as a resource for risk communication, awareness rising or other purposes Academics, health and environmental impact assessment practitioners and researchers in the field of air pollution – as updated evidence-based summaries of the relevant research findings in relation to the health effects of ambient air pollution

12 WHO AQG in setting national air quality standards
In 96 countries WHO AQG were the main resource to establish or revise national standards for PM10 and SO2 short-term (years ) (Vahlsing and Smith, 2011)

13 WHO AQG in the EU air quality legislation

14 World maps of national ambient air quality standards in relation to WHO air quality guideline values (WHO-AQG) for PM10 The PM10 WHO annual guideline value of 20 µg/m3 was adopted by only six authorities (Afghanistan, Cameroon, Fiji, Iceland, Iran and Switzerland), whereas most countries have set values between 40 and 50  µg/m3 up to 120  µg/m3 Source :

15 Background for update of AQ guidelines

16 Health impact of air pollution
Source: World Bank, 2016 6.5 million premature deaths worldwide in 2012, due to effects of ambient and household air pollution 600,000 premature deaths in WHO/ EURO each year Economic cost of death and disease from air pollution amounts to USD 1.6 trillion in WHO/EURO alone Source: WHO/EURO and OECD, 2015; WHO, 2016

17 New scientific evidence on health effects
Substantial body of new scientific evidence generated since WHO AQG 2005 WHO/EURO REVIHAAP report (2013) IARC classification of air pollution as Group 1 carcinogen (2013) More long term studies, including at lower level exposures Additional information on shape of the exposure-response (i.e. IERs) Studies on new health end-points Recent national health risk assessments for ambient air pollutants Emerging studies from China and other non-NA/EU areas Accountability studies to evaluate effectiveness of air quality interventions

18 First WHA Resolution on Air Pollution and Health
Highlights the key role of health authorities in raising awareness about the potential to save lives and reduce health costs, if air pollution is addressed effectively Identifies the need for strong cooperation between sectors and integration of health concerns into all national, regional and local air pollution-related policies Urges Member States to develop air quality monitoring systems and health registries to improve surveillance for all illnesses related to air pollution Urges Member States to strengthen international transfer of expertise, technologies and scientific data in the field of air pollution Recognizes the role of WHO AQG, both for ambient and indoor air quality, in providing guidance and recommendations for clean air that protect human health

19 WHA Resolution and update of air quality guidelines
The WHA Resolution recognizes that : …and requests the Director-General to significantly strengthen WHO’s capacities in the field of air pollution and health in order to provide:

20 WHO Guideline development process and scope of updated guidelines

21 The update of the WHO Global AQGs (2016 ~)
A global project coordinated by the WHO Regional Office’s European Centre for Environment and Health (ECEH), Bonn, with participation from all WHO regions and WHO headquarters Funding and in-kind support provided by: European Commission Swiss Federal Office for the Environment German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety United States Environmental Protection Agency Government of the Republic of Korea

22 Proposed general objectives
To provide updated numerical concentration limits (i.e. guidelines) and, where possible, an indication of the shape of the concentration-response function for a number of ambient air pollutants, for relevant averaging times and in relation to critical health outcomes. To provide a qualitative recommendation on the relation between exposure to desert dust and adverse health outcomes.

23 WHO guidelines Represent the most widely accepted set of public health recommendations, intended to assist policy-makers, health-care providers, and other relevant stakeholders to make informed decisions for the protection of public health Based on a comprehensive and objective assessment of the available evidence Generally intended for worldwide use, and therefore recognize the heterogeneity on technological feasibility, economic development and other political and economical factors WHO adopted internationally recognized standards and methods to ensure that guidelines are free from biases and meet public health needs

24 Guideline development process - guideline groups and main steps
WHO Steering Group Guideline Development Group and External Review Group Systematic Review Teams Management of Conflict of Interest Formulations of the questions (PECOS/ PICO) Evidence retrieval, assessment and synthesis GRADE – Evidence profile Systematic Review Process From Evidence to Recommendations

25 Development of the new guidelines
Systematically review scientific evidence on: Adverse health effects from exposure to PM2.5, PM10, NO2, SO2, O3 and CO for relevant averaging times and in relation to critical health outcomes Adverse health impacts from desert and sand dust Provide evidence-based recommendations Concentration limits and, where possible, shape of the concentration-response function for each air pollutant/avg time/health outcome Qualitative recommendation on the relationship between exposure to desert dust and adverse health outcomes

26 Systematic Review Teams
Long-term exposure to O3 and NO2 & all-cause and cause-specific mortality Long-term exposure to PM & all-cause and cause-specific mortality Short-term exposure to O3, NO2 and PM & all-cause and cause-specific mortality Short-term exposure to O3, NO2 and SO2 & emergency department and hospital admissions due to asthma Short-term exposure to CO and emergency department and hospital admissions due to ischaemic heart disease Health impacts from desert and sand dust

27 Grading the evidence Assessment of the overall quality of evidence for relationship between air pollutant, averaging time and health outcome(s): Study limitations Inconsistency of results Indirectness of evidence Imprecision Publication bias Magnitude of effect Plausible confounding Dose-response gradient OVERALL QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: High quality Moderate quality Low quality Very low quality

28 Developing recommendations
1 Quality of evidence (high / moderate / low / very low) 2 Balance of benefits and harms (when implementing the recommendation) 3 Values and preferences (of general population and/or specific groups) 4 Resource use (more or less resource-intensive to implement a recommendation)

29 From development to implementation
The guidelines provide a tool to: Aid closing the gap between scientific evidence and practice/action Lay foundations for developing limits and standards in national regulations Derive the health burden from air pollution Facilitate cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses of various policies Identify critical research gaps that will need to be filled in the future Harmonise action plans for sustainable development within the regional and global frameworks

30 Progress of updating WHO global AQG
Ongoing project (started in 2016) 1st scoping meeting of Guideline development group meeting : Sep 2016 Selection of pollutants and health outcomes Long-term and/or short-term exposure to PM (PM2.5, PM10), NO2, O3, SO2, CO Health outcomes based on causality and severity of effects Consideration of health impacts from natural sources (desert dust) Guideline proposal approved by Guideline Review Committee: Jan 2017 Systematic reviews on long-term exposure to (PM, NO2 and O3) and short-term exposure to PM, NO2, O3, SO2, CO : May 2017 ~ 2nd guideline development group meeting : 1416 March 2018

31 Thank you for your attention
31


Download ppt "Hanna Yang, Dorota Jarosinska, Roman Perez Velasco"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google