Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection"— Presentation transcript:

1 Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection
Jarrod Blinch, Brendan Cameron, Ian Franks, Romeo Chua School of Human Kinetics University of British Columbia motorbehaviour.wordpress.com

2 Research question Do bimanual reaches with more cognitive visuomotor control processes compared to more automatic control exhibit greater coupling? Do bimanual reaches with more cognitive visuomotor control processes compared to more automatic control exhibit greater coupling? Do bimanual reaches with more cognitive visuomotor control processes compared to more automatic control exhibit greater coupling? Do bimanual reaches with more cognitive visuomotor control processes compared to more automatic control exhibit greater coupling? Do bimanual reaches with more cognitive visuomotor control processes compared to more automatic control exhibit greater coupling?

3 Kelso, Southard, & Goodman, 1983
Define bimanual reach Two types of coupling: temporal, spatial Asymmetric movement Coupling during movement execution, what about coupling during movement preparation? Kelso, Putnam, & Goodman, 1979 Kelso, Southard, & Goodman, 1983

4 L S L L Symbolic cues Spatial cues Asymmetric movement
Coupling during movement preparation Response selection or response programming, both measured by reaction time Symbolic cues Reaction times were longer for asymmetric movements compared to symmetric movements Reaction time cost for asymmetric movements RP or RS, if RP then any movement, regardless of the type of cue Spatial cues Equivalent RTs for symmetric and asymmetric movements So… Diedrichsen, Hazeltine, Kennerley, & Ivry, 2001

5 Reaction time cost with symbolic cues
Coupling during movement preparation Increased processing demands on response selection Translate two different symbolic cues Assign a movement to each arm fMRI Increased processing in the medial frontal cortex Pre-Supplementary motor area and the rostral cingulate zone More cognitive-motor visuomotor processing compared to symmetric movements or spatial cues This increase in cognitive processing for symbolically-cued asymmetric movements creates coupling during movement preparation, but what about movement execution, specifically spatial coupling? Diedrichsen, Grafton, Albert, Hazeltine, & Ivry, 2006

6 Research question Do bimanual reaches with more cognitive visuomotor control processes compared to more automatic control exhibit greater spatial coupling?

7 L S Method 16 participants Spatial and symbolic cues Optotrak
Cues: counterbalanced over two days

8 Replicated RT cost with symbolic cues and not spatial cues

9 Half of the trials from one participant
Symmetric in blue, Asymmetric in red 14% of symbolic asymmetric movements had large trajectory modulations Spatial coupling or an online correction?

10 Symbolic, long-short, no modulations Symbolic, short-long, modulations
Left arm (blue) to the long-distance target Velocity at 100 ms to examine what was programmed (before online control) Not coupling during movement execution, but rather online corrections to errors in target selection Also supported by delta reaction time

11 Discussion Increased cognitive processing for response selection with symbolically-cued asymmetric movements Coupling was also related to response selection Reaction time cost Errors in target selection Coupling is limited to the processes that require greater cognitive control Perhaps bimanual coupling is limited to the processes that require greater cognitive control Increased cognitive control for response selection leads to coupling during response selection We predict that experiments with spatial coupling likely had increased cognitive control to monitor movement execution, for example… In conclusion, bimanual coupling is limited to the processes that require greater cognitive control

12 Spatial coupling Franz, Zelaznik, Swinnen, & Walter, 2001
Swinnen, Lee, Verschueren, Serrien, & Bogaerds, 1997

13 Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection
Jarrod Blinch, Brendan Cameron, Ian Franks, Romeo Chua School of Human Kinetics University of British Columbia motorbehaviour.wordpress.com

14 Movement time

15 Spatial

16 Symbolic

17 Delta reaction time (ms)
Symbolic, no modulations Symbolic, modulations Long-Short -10.2 -0.4 Short-Long 0.6 -9.4 Delta reaction time Time difference for the left and right arms to begin their movements, negative is a left arm lead No modulations: large left hand head start of 10 ms for LS movements (handedness) With modulations: large left hand head start for SL movements

18 Online response selection


Download ppt "Bimanual reaches with symbolic cues exhibit errors in target selection"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google