1. Volume 2, Issue 11, Pages 984-993 (November 2015)
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of tailored intensive liaison between primary and secondary care to identify individuals at risk of a first psychotic illness (the LEGs study): a cluster-randomised controlled trial 
Jesus Perez, PhD, Huajie Jin, MSc, Debra A Russo, BSc, Jan Stochl, PhD, Michelle Painter, MPhil, Gill Shelley, BA, Erica Jackson, BA, Carolyn Crane, MSc, Jonathan P Graffy, MD, Prof Tim J Croudace, PhD, Prof Sarah Byford, PhD, Prof Peter B Jones, PhD 
The Lancet Psychiatry 
Volume 2, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
DOI: /S (15)
Copyright © 2015 Perez et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1 Trial profile GPs=general practitioners.
The Lancet Psychiatry 2015 2, DOI: ( /S (15) )
Copyright © 2015 Perez et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Number and type of referrals by general practices in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough
PAU=practice as usual. HR=high risk of developing psychosis. FEP=first-episode of psychotic illness.
The Lancet Psychiatry 2015 2, DOI: ( /S (15) )
Copyright © 2015 Perez et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
Box plot of the distribution of patient referrals from primary care to secondary care
HR=high risk of developing psychosis. FEP=first episode of psychotic illness. PAU=practice as usual. Lower bounds show the 25th percentile. Upper bounds show the 75th percentile. Line represents the median. Black dot represents the mean. White dots show the outliers.
The Lancet Psychiatry 2015 2, DOI: ( /S (15) )
Copyright © 2015 Perez et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY Terms and Conditions