Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 228-242 (January 2018)
Histone 2B-GFP Label-Retaining Prostate Luminal Cells Possess Progenitor Cell Properties and Are Intrinsically Resistant to Castration  Dingxiao Zhang, Collene Jeter, Shuai Gong, Amanda Tracz, Yue Lu, Jianjun Shen, Dean G. Tang  Stem Cell Reports  Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018) DOI: /j.stemcr Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

2 Stem Cell Reports 2018 10, 228-242DOI: (10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.11.016)
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

3 Figure 1 Identification of H2B-GFP LRCs
(A) Loss of GFP signals in DOX-chased prostates. Shown are gross GFP images in whole-mount prostates (left) and microdissected prostate branches (right) isolated from bigenic mice chased for 0 weeks (no chase), 6 weeks, and 9 weeks. (B) Gross GFP images in different lobes of prostates dissected from unchased adult Pb-tetVP16-GFP bigenic mice. (C–E) Double IF of CK5 or CK8 and GFP in different prostate lobes harvested from bigenic mice chased (on DOX diet) for 0 weeks (C), 9 weeks (D), and 12 weeks (E). Arrows and dashed arrows in (C) (top) indicate CK5+GFP+ basal cells and luminal cells shed into the lumen, respectively. AP, VP, DP, and LP refer to anterior, ventral, dorsal, and lateral prostate lobes, respectively. Dashed boxed regions are enlarged (solid boxes). Scale bars, 50 μm. See also Figure S1. Stem Cell Reports  , DOI: ( /j.stemcr ) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

4 Figure 2 Dynamics and Characterization of LRCs
(A) Scheme for tracking the dynamics of prostatic GFP+ cells in hormonally intact mice, in which we started chasing the bigenic animals at 6 weeks of age and analyzed the prostate tissues at different time points post chase. (B) IF images of CK8 and GFP in the VP isolated from bigenic mice chased for different time intervals. (C and D) Quantification of GFP+ cells in luminal (C) and basal (D) cell populations as a function of chase time. At each time point, two to four mice were examined, and data are shown as the mean ± SE. (E) IF staining of Ki67 and CK8 in different prostate lobes in wild-type adult mice. Arrows indicate Ki67+CK8+ cells. (F) IF of GFP and CK8 in the AP of unchased adult bigenic mice showing symmetrical division of luminal cells. (G) IF staining of Ki67 and GFP in the VP of bigenic mice chased for 12 weeks. See also Figure S2 and Table S1. Stem Cell Reports  , DOI: ( /j.stemcr ) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

5 Figure 3 The LRC Population Harbors Tissue Regeneration Ability In Vivo Freshly purified lineage-depleted (Lin−) prostatic LRCs (i.e., GFP+ cells from 12-week-chased bigenic mice) exhibit higher stem/progenitor activities than matched non-LRCs (i.e., GFP− cells). Shown are colony formation (A), limiting-dilution sphere (B), sphere size measurement (C), and in vivo prostate tissue regeneration (D) assays. In (D), 1, 2, and 3 indicate the three representative recombinants. Results shown for each panel were representative data of at least two to three independent experiments showing consistent results. For (B) and (C), data are shown as the mean ± SD derived from technical replicates. See also Figure S3. Stem Cell Reports  , DOI: ( /j.stemcr ) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

6 Figure 4 Luminal LRCs Mark Progenitors Capable of Regenerating Prostate Glands In Vivo (A–C) Freshly purified Lin− luminal GFP+ LRCs exhibit stem/progenitor activities. Shown are higher colony- (A) and organoid- (B) forming capabilities and larger sphere sizes (C) in L-GFP+ compared with L-GFP− cells. For (B) and (C), data are shown as the mean ± SD derived from technical replicates. (D–F) Only luminal GFP+, but not GFP− cells, are capable of regenerating prostate tissues in vivo. Shown are H&E staining (D) and IF of CK5 and CK8 (E), and GFP (F) in prostate glands regenerated in vivo from sorted luminal GFP+ cells co-injected with mouse UGM. (G and H) Enrichment of luminal LRCs in the proximal mouse prostate. Different prostate lobes dissected from bigenic mice at 10.5 weeks of DOX chase were divided longitudinally into two portions (distal and proximal) and subjected to IF of GFP and CK8. Shown are representative images (G) and quantification data (H) from two different mice. Results shown (A)–(F) are representative data of at least two to three independent experiments showing consistent results. For (G) and (H), two bigenic mice were analyzed and data represent the means from cell number counting of five to eight random high-magnification (×20) images of each indicated category. See also Figure S4 and Table S1. Stem Cell Reports  , DOI: ( /j.stemcr ) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

7 Figure 5 Luminal LRCs Display a Luminal Progenitor Gene Signature Associated with CRPC (A) Scheme of RNA-seq experiments using freshly purified L-GFP+ and L-GFP− cells from bigenic mice chased for 12 weeks. (B) Representative GSEA results in luminal GFP+ cells. (C) Differential expression of the indicated genes in RNA-seq in L-GFP+ versus L-GFP− cells. (D) IF of GFP and AR in 12-week-chased animals. Shown are representative images (left) and quantification data (right; a total of 41, 71, and 73 GFP+ cells for AP, VP, and DLP, respectively, were counted from four to six random high-magnification (×20) images of each lobe). In (D), solid arrows point to GFP+/ARhi cells and dashed arrows to GFP+/ARlow cells. (E) Functional annotation by DAVID of genes preferentially upregulated in luminal GFP+ cells. (F and G) GSEA results for the enrichment of indicated gene signatures in luminal GFP+ cells. See also Figure S5 and Table S1. Stem Cell Reports  , DOI: ( /j.stemcr ) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

8 Figure 6 Luminal LRCs Resist Castration In Vivo
The Pb-tetVP16-GFP bigenic male mice were castrated at 11, 10, 12, and 12 weeks after chase and analyzed 1 week (A), 4 weeks (B), 1 week (C), and 2 weeks (D) later, respectively. Shown are representative images of urogenital organs and dissected prostate lobes (A), IF of GFP and CK8 in the VP (B–D) and H&E of AP (D) from bigenic mice with or without castration. Quantification of the percentage of GFP+ cells in CK8+ luminal cell population in different prostate lobes in above experimental castration settings is presented at the bottom. Arrow in (C) indicates a rare GFP+CK8+ luminal cell. See also Figure S6. Stem Cell Reports  , DOI: ( /j.stemcr ) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

9 Figure 7 Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Luminal LRCs
(A) Summary of mRNA (measured in RNA-seq) and protein (measured by IF staining on both frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded [FFPE] sections) expression of the indicated phenotypic markers of the luminal progenitors. (B) Double IF staining of GFP and the indicated markers in FFPE sections of prostate glands harvested from bigenic mice chased for 12 weeks. Boxed regions are enlarged. See also Figure S7. Stem Cell Reports  , DOI: ( /j.stemcr ) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google