1. Cost-Benefit Analysis of EnMS Implementation at Enterprise level and Programme level
Giorgia Pasqualetto
Project Associate
Department of Energy
UNIDO
Ana Petrovska
National Project Manager
REC Country Office Macedonia
Marco Matteini
Industrial Development Officer
Department of Energy
UNIDO
14 December 2017
Skopje, Macedonia

2. UNIDO EnMS-ISO 50001 CBI Program in Macedonia

3. UNIDO EnMS-ISO 50001 CBI Program in Macedonia

4. Integration of skills development and results
time
1-2 months
2 days
1.5-2 months
4 days
4-6 months
3 days
4-6 months
3 days
2-3 months
EXAM
½ day
Preparation
USER Training
PE team work to implement EnMS
PLANNING Training
PE team work to implement EnMS
IMPLEM. Training
PE team work to implement EnMS
CHECKING Training
PE team work to implement EnMS
Results:
Draft Energy Policy
Draft Roles & Responsibility matrix
Initial data collection
Results:
Energy Policy
Roles & Responsibility matrix
Significant Energy Uses
Baseline
Energy Performance Indicators
Opportunities list & action plans
Energy & cost savings
Performance improvements
Results:
Staff trained on selected SEUs
Operations & controls improved
Procurement plan
EE measures implemented
Energy & cost savings
Performance improvements
Results:
Energy performance checked, verified and reported
Energy performance reviewed by top management
Decisions for next period based on internal audit
Energy & cost savings
Performance improvements
Results:
Trainee qualified as Energy Management System Expert
EnMS implemented in PE
Energy & cost savings
Performance improvements
Legend
PE team
A Partner Enterprise (PE) team is formed by the PE’s staff participating in the EXPERT program plus 1-2 national consultants trainees.
Ongoing and periodic communication through webinars, s and phone calls between international trainers and PE teams to review progress, discuss issues and provide guidance.
Plant visits by national EE consultants trainees 4

5. Improvement of Energy Management Practices
Ex Refractory Material, Medium-size Company
Vardar Dolomit
Improvement of Energy Management Practices
Production of fire restistant materials based on sintered dolomite
85 employees
29.3 GWh consumption of oil & mazut
3.3 GWh 2015 consumption of electricity
Vardar Dolomit improvements 2016
Energy Management System Implemented
No. of Measures/Projects 21
Total Capital Investment (EUR)
5,600
Gross Monetary Savings (EUR)
89,655
Overall Payback Period (in years)
0.06
2016 Electricity Savings Nor. (MWh)
248
2016 GHG Reductions (tons CO2)
320.7
Payback time of EnMS considering all experts and staff costs: 3 months
19,655 € from electricity savings (7.5%), normalized
70,000 € from power purchase contract savings, due to better electricity demand control and forecasting
Money savings in = 19,655 EUR
kg of CO2/MWh primary energy (coal)
35% power generation efficiency
248 MWh final electricity savings
Primary energy savings 248/0.35 = 957 MWh
CO2 emission (ton) 957*335/1000 =
Payback time of EnMS considering all experts and staff costs: 3 months
In 2017, added oil & mazut to EnMS scope
174 MWh of normalized energy savings in first 4 months of 2017 with NO investments

6. REK BITOLA improvements in 2016 Energy Management System Implemented
Ex. 2 - Power Generation, Large Company
REK BITOLA
Mining and Energy Combine (REK) Bitola meets over 70% of country’s demand for electricity
Coal-lignite thermal power plant, total installed generating capacity of 700 MW and annual generation of 4,000 GWh
Production in 2016 was 2,685 GWh; own consumption was GWh
REK BITOLA improvements in 2016
Energy Management System Implemented
No. of Measures/Projects 4
Total Capital Investment (EUR)
Gross Monetary Savings (EUR)
322,000
Overall Payback Period (in years)
0.00
2016 Energy Savings Norm. (MWh)
8,502
2016 GHG Reductions (tons CO2)
10,528
In 2016, EnMS limited to power generation facilities
In 2017, EnMS extended to incl. mining operations
8,700 MWh normalized savings as of 7 Oct 2017
EnMS implementation being replicated in all branches of ELEM, the national largest power utility
Mining and Energy Combine (REK) Bitola is located in the southern part of Macedonia, in Pelagonia plain. It has been built on the basis of the finds of coal-lignite, at around 12 km eastern from the city of Bitola. The Combine operates as a Plant of the Public Enterprise Electric Company of Macedonia. It consists of the following infrastructural structures: the Mines Suvodol and Brod and Thermal Power Plant (TPP) Bitola, and three departments - for legal affairs, for economic affairs and for investments and research, with a total number of 3000 employees. The conception of development and exploitation of the thermal power plant Bitola Unit 1 was initiated in In 1984, Unit 2 was put into operation, and Unit 3 in 1988, constructed in the manner that can be adapted for joint operation with another Unit 4 that remained undeveloped. REK Bitola is a facility of strategic importance and primary installation for electricity generation in the Republic of Macedonia. It covers over 70% of the demand for electricity in the country, as well as major part of the industrial boiler plants’ coal (lignite) necessity and consumption. With its three completed units of individual capacity of MW or total installed capacity of 700 MW REK Bitola provides an average annual generation of 4000GWh electricity. It has 3000 workers and existing management systems ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and OHSAS
is Energy Policy in place
is company has an energy actions plan
is annual EE training for staff
12) is company use LCC analysis for EE investments
2.97% of total consumption
Payback time: days

7. Costs and Benefits Analysis with In-Kind - Pilot phase
EnMS Capacity Building and Implementation Program
Costs and Benefits Analysis with In-Kind - Pilot phase
12 Partner enterprises (65% success rate)
23 Nat. Consultants/Expert Trainees
In-kind contribution from Nat. Consultants
Programme implementation
No inclusion of UNIDO staff & support costs
Energy Savings 1 Yr: GWh (63% no cost)
Energy Savings 5 Yr: 165 GWh
Money savings 1 Yr: 862,700 USD (52% no cost)
Money savings 5 Yr: 10,792,000 USD
Without considering non-energy benefits! 7

8. Costs and Benefits Analysis – Replication Scenario
EnMS Capacity Building and Implementation Program
Costs and Benefits Analysis – Replication Scenario
10 Partner enterprises
12 UNIDO National EnMS Expert
Include Progr. preparation and implementation
No inclusion of UNIDO staff & project support costs
Target Final Energy Savings 1 Yr: 10 GWh
Target Money Savings 1 Yr: 650,000 USD
(50% no cost)
Without considering non-energy benefits! 8

9. Ongoing EnMS Replication
EnMS Capacity Building and Implementation Program
Ongoing EnMS Replication
Partnership between UNIDO-GEF IEE Project and EVN Macedonia
6+1 new companies implementing EnMS, including EVN Macedonia
6 UNIDO Qualified National EnMS Experts
7 new EnMS Expert Trainees, 2 from EVN Macedonia
Cost-sharing of Qualified National EnMS Experts
1/3 UNIDO project; 1/3 EVN Macedonia; 1/3 Beneficiary company
75% National Trainers – 25% International Trainers
EVN Macedonia’s Goals  Start providing EnMS-EE Services to Clients
Estimated Replication Cost to IEE project is ̴ 15% of Pilot Program (i.e. about 30,000 USD) 9

10. THANK YOU!