Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Photoz z=0.8 z=0.6 z=0.4 z=0.2 IAB<25 1.4Mio galaxies X-ray

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Photoz z=0.8 z=0.6 z=0.4 z=0.2 IAB<25 1.4Mio galaxies X-ray"— Presentation transcript:

1 Photoz z=0.8 z=0.6 z=0.4 z=0.2 IAB<25 1.4Mio galaxies X-ray contours

2 X-ray galaxy groups in zCOSMOS
Alexis Finoguenov MPE/UMBC +zCOSMOS team

3 View on baryons from COSMOS
X-ray+red sequence: 278 Xray+spectroscopy: 195 z< /175 91% 0.8<z<1 37/50 74% z> / % N(z)=>2 Alexis Finoguenov View on baryons from COSMOS

4 View on baryons from COSMOS
X-ray only groups Alexis Finoguenov View on baryons from COSMOS

5 How X-ray groups are different from spectroscopic groups?
Spec. completeness is better at low z But drops faster with redshift

6 Comparison of a group definition
X-ray only Spec-z groups with X-rays Spec-z 3 member groups, no X-rays: stacked X-ray @z>0.8 X-rays (`a 6.e-16 cgs) are more sensitive group tracer compared to IAB<22.5 galaxies Inside dense LSS Fraction of X-ray groups increases by a factor of 2 Alexis Finoguenov View on baryons from COSMOS

7 Stacked X-ray detection of Knobel groups
Redshift Flux (cgs) Lx ( keV) M200 Msun kT (keV) 1.6e-16 2.e42 1.7e13 0.7 9.e-17 1.e42 1.1e13 0.6 4.e-17 6.e40 0.4e13 0.3 0.37 1.e-16 4.e-16 8.e40 1.6e41 0.3e13 0.5e13 0.4 Alexis Finoguenov View on baryons from COSMOS

8 Stacked detection of spectro-z groups

9 View on baryons from COSMOS
Lx-sigma relation Alexis Finoguenov View on baryons from COSMOS

10 LSS at 0.12, 0.22, 0.34, 0.37, 0.51, 0.73, 0.89 (Optical groups:0.22,0.36,0.38) K.Kovac

11 Resolving LSS with X-ray groups
Alexis Finoguenov View on baryons from COSMOS

12 Simulations… Fraction of matter resolved in groups
Alexis Finoguenov A. Faltenbacher, AF, N. Drory 2010 ApJ

13 Environmental dependence of galaxy mass function
Alexis Finoguenov View on baryons from COSMOS

14 View on baryons from COSMOS
No change in HOD! Alexis Finoguenov View on baryons from COSMOS

15 Bump in galaxy mass function: centrals vs sattelites
Alexis Finoguenov View on baryons from COSMOS

16 View on baryons from COSMOS
Conclusions X-ray groups approach the status of being spectroscopically confirmed. X-ray groups are not a subsample of spectroscopic groups Groups are tracers of density field and can be used to overcome to sample variance. Alexis Finoguenov View on baryons from COSMOS

17 View on baryons from COSMOS
People involved Masayuki Tanaka – properties of galaxies in X-ray groups using zCOSMOS Stefania Giodini – HOD of galaxies, galaxy mass function, fossil groups Alexie Leauthaud – properties of BCGs Berian James – conditional mass function – modeling Andreas Faltenbacher – conditional mass function – simulations Katarina Kovac – density fields Angela Iovino, Michol Bolzonella, Olga Cucciatti – properties of galaxies Viola Allevato (my PhD student) – clustering analysis Michael Ballogh – 10 groups at z~0.9 with Gemini Masayuki Tanaka – groups at z>1 with Subaru Mara Salvato – high-z clusters Simona Mei et al. FORS2 program – already 350 redshifts for groups added (or 30% of total number) And likely you! (a number of on-going efforts!) Alexis Finoguenov View on baryons from COSMOS


Download ppt "Photoz z=0.8 z=0.6 z=0.4 z=0.2 IAB<25 1.4Mio galaxies X-ray"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google