Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Title not in the box. Review introductory sentence

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Title not in the box. Review introductory sentence"— Presentation transcript:

1 Influence of Academic Training and Gender on Drugs Use of a Spanish University Population
Title not in the box. Review introductory sentence Msc and Ph.D. Project of Veronica Varela Mato Supervised by Dra. Stacy Clemes and Dr. J.M. Cancela Contact

2 To Talk about Background Aim and Sample Methods Results Conclusion
References Title: to talk about?; if you want to keep the slide, explain in more details what the sections will include

3 Background Vigo University, Spain. Pontevedra Campus.

4 Sample Pontevedra Campus, 3467 students (2010) N=985 Heads of Schools
Lecturers I would put Pontevedra Campus, 3467 students (2010) or 2010: Pontevedra Campus, 3467 students. Change N by n. Students, self-reported and validated questionnaire

5 Sample distribution Replace N by n and put n=985 students not Students. For the labels, males females instead of male, female? Put blue instead of blue to stay consistent with the rest of the slides?

6 Measures Alcohol (Frequency, amount, binge drinking per week)
Tobacco (cigarettes per day) Illicit drugs (types, last week) Frequency, types, amount are in arial 16 and the other text « per day and types » is arial 18. Put Eroski consumer in the middle. What is Eroski consumer? Put a border to the pictures? Eroski consumer

7 Aim: Patterns of consumption
Health-related Degrees (PA+SC, Nursing, Physiotherapy) Education-related Degrees (Childcare, Primary, PE…) Write down the objective of the study Non-Health or non-Education related Degrees (Engineering, Fine arts, Advertising and Public Relation, Audio-visual communication)

8 Statistical Analyses Odds Ratio (OR) 95% CI Chi-square test. 95% CI
To assess the association between drugs consumption and different groups Chi-square test. 95% CI To compare the difference between the consumption median for each group Mantel-Haenszel test To stratify the analysis according to gender and academic training Text in brackets is Calibri 16 for group A and B but is Calibri 11 for group C.

9 Analyses Academic Disciplines Licit Drugs Illicit Drugs

10 WEEKEND, 77% of students drank alcohol (p<0.05)
Results: Alcohol WEEKEND, 77% of students drank alcohol (p<0.05) Binge drinking, Male: 8 or + SDU Female: 6 or + SDU FEMALE vs. MALE 56% vs. 41% (p< 0.001) Males: 83.7% Females: 73.8% I would not put a capital letter for Students. Males/females, define binge drinking. Make the first sentence clearer especially for the weekend part

11 Results: Tobacco 34% of students were habitual smokers (p<0.05)
11 34% of students were habitual smokers (p<0.05) (8+ cigarettes per day) 1 Particularly WOMEN, 35% vs. 32% (p=0.38) I would just put 34% and not 1/3 because it is the same information. Or you can say 1/3 for the oral presentation. Define habitual smkiers.

12 Results: Illegal Drugs
12 35.4% had used illegal drugs in the last week Higher prevalence among MEN, 45% vs. 31% (p< 0.001) No significant differences in daily use (p=0.22) The sentence in the midlles is calibri 26 and not calibri 28. Add p-value for second line.

13 Results: Academic Disciplines
13 Alcohol use: No significant differences (p>0.05) Tobacco use: 40% of C & B vs. 20% of A (p<0.05) Illegal drugs: 44% of C vs. 30% of A & B (p<0.05) P<0.05 should be significant? Or put the sign the other way around. Redifine groups A, B and C; Group A: PA+SC, Nursing, Physiotherapy. Group B: Childcare, Primary, PE, Musical Education Group C: Engineering, Fine arts, Advertising and Public Relation, Audio-visual communication.

14 Summary Tobacco Illegal Drugs Alcohol Lowest rate: group A
14 WEEKEND Binge drinking: WOMEN No sig. differences between groups (p>0.05) Alcohol WOMEN Lowest rate: group A Sig. differences between groups (p<0.05) Tobacco Illegal Drugs Change the sign of p value as it is wrong. I will put summary instead of summarize? MEN Lowest use: group A Sig. differences between groups (p<0.05)

15 Conclusion Binge drinking results - population distribution (2,3)
15 Binge drinking results - population distribution (2,3) Binge drinking strongly related to university life style (4,5) Spanish students doing health-related degrees (A) smoked less (6,7) & less drugs use. (8,9) Illegal drugs & High prevalence of licit/illicit drugs consumption among university students (10) with clear differences by gender.

16 Future projects 16 Gender-sensitive strategies to promote a healthier lifestyle among Spanish university students (Women) Comparative study among this sample and students from Loughborough University, with the aim of elaborate an international research.

17 References . 17 v.varela-mato@lboro.ac.uk
López A, Collishaw N, Piha T. A descriptive model of the cigarette epidemic in developed countries. Tob Control 1994; 3: Cortes MT, Espejo TB, Gimenez JA. Characteristics that define the 'botellon' phenomenon in university students and adolescents. Adicciones 2007; 19: Mota N, Alvarez-Gil R, Corral M, et al. Risky alcohol use and heavy episodic drinking among Spanish University students: a two-year follow-up. Gac Sanit. 2010;24:327-7 von Bothmer MI, Fridlund B. Gender differences in health habits and in motivation for a healthy lifestyle among Swedish university students. Nurs Health Sci 2005; 7: Kelly-Weeder S. Binge drinking in college-aged women: framing a gender-specific prevention strategy. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2008; 20: Fernandez D, Martin V, Molina AJ, et al. Smoking habits of students of nursing: a questionnaire survey ( ). Nurse Educ Today 2010; 30: Mas A, Nerin I, Barrueco M, et al. Smoking habits among sixth-year medical students in Spain. Arch Bronconeumol 2004; 40: Leatherdale ST, Hammond DG, Kaiserman M, et al. Marijuana and tobacco use among young adults in Canada: are they smoking what we think they are smoking? Cancer Causes Control 2007; 18: Pérez A, Ariza C, Sánchez-Martínez F, et al. Cannabis consumption initiation among adolescents: a longitudinal study. Addict Behav 2010; 35: .

18 Veronica Varela-Mato & Stacy Clemes v.varela-mato@lboro.ac.uk
Thank you very much Veronica Varela-Mato & Stacy Clemes

19 Alcohol, SDU.

20 Drugs use (%) last 12 months de 15 a 64 años
The most consumed drugs between the age range of 15 and 64 years old were alcohol and tabaco followed by cannabis and hipnosedantes The prevalence of drugs consumption was higher for all substances in men than women except for hipnosedative, were the prevalence was higher for women. EDADES 2009/10 Observatorio Español sobre Drogas Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional Sobre Drogas

21 Alcohol consumption (%) age range: 15 to 64 years old
Constant drugs use in comparason with other years. Weekend. The most consumed type of alcohol is beer. EDADES /10 Observatorio Español sobre Drogas Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional Sobre Drogas

22 Consumos intensivos de alcohol de 15 a 64 años: Borracheras
En 2009, el 23,1% de la población de 15 a 64 años se emborrachó en los últimos 12 meses. (67% hombres y 33% mujeres) Tendencia ascendente de las borracheras de 15 a 64 en ambos sexos y grupos de edad. Borracheras (%) en los últimos 12 meses de 15 a 64 años por edad y sexo. EDADES /10 Observatorio Español sobre Drogas Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional Sobre Drogas

23 binge drinking 2009, the 14,9% of the population between 15 to 64 years old had binge drinking (70% men, 30%women). binge drinking higher prevalence among men between 15 to 34 years old. binge drinking* in the last 30 days. Age range :15 a 64 years old /sex. * Binge drinking: ingesta de 5 o > bebidas alcohólicas (hombres) y 4 o > (mujeres) en la misma ocasión (en el plazo de un par de horas) EDADES /10 Observatorio Español sobre Drogas Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional Sobre Drogas

24 Tobacco consumption (%). Age range 15 to 64 years old
Tendency towards stabilization after the social debate before the approval of the law 28/2005. Debate social Ley 28/2005 EDADES /10 Observatorio Español sobre Drogas Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional Sobre Drogas

25 Daily tobacco use (%) by sex and age
Similar daily use by between the age range of 15 to 34 and 35 to 64 years old Tendency towards decreasing among women. 15 to 34 years old. EDADES /10 Observatorio Español sobre Drogas Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional Sobre Drogas

26 Cannabis consumption (%) between 15 to 64 years old.
Cannabis the most consumed drug between15 to 64 years old Stabilised consumption from 2003 Leve incremento del consumo experimental: atribuible al intervalo de edad entre 20 y 34 a. Descenso en intervalo 15 a 19 a. EDADES /10 Observatorio Español sobre Drogas Delegación del Gobierno para el Plan Nacional Sobre Drogas

27 Universidad Complutense de Madrid

28 Universidad Complutense de Madrid

29 Universidad Complutense de Madrid


Download ppt "Title not in the box. Review introductory sentence"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google