Oklahoma Extension Today and Tomorrow

Oklahoma Extension Today and Tomorrow
Dr. James Trapp Associate Director October 2016

Disclaimer The data and graphics you are about to see are believed to be accurate representations of the current state of Extension in Oklahoma, but not all definitions are consistent across all slides and some values are based on estimates. All data is believed to be correct and have been observed to be logical, but errors may exist in individual cases.

Disclaimer Examples given reflect potential types of structures/staffing that could be implemented in the future, but are only presented for consideration of what that type of structure, or a similar structure, might look like. They do not necessarily reflect the opinion of administration.

KEY QUESTION #1? What will our funding level be 5 years from now?
-20% -10% Flat +10% +20%

Area/District Specialist 2.3 11.3 22.5
Staffing Impacts of State Budget Cuts Position Type 1% 5% 10% $236,369 $1,181,845 $2,363,690 Faculty 1.5 7.7 15.3 Area/District Specialist 2.3 11.3 22.5 County Educator 2.9 14.4 28.8 Campus Support Staff 4.3 21.5 43.0 County Support Staff 5.3 26.3 52.5

Staffing Impacts of Unfunded Salary Programs
Staffing Impacts of State Budget Cuts Position Type 1% 5% 10% $236,369 $1,181,845 $2,363,690 Faculty 1.5 7.7 15.3 Area/District Specialist 2.3 11.3 22.5 County Educator 2.9 14.4 28.8 Campus Support Staff 4.3 21.5 43.0 County Support Staff 5.3 26.3 52.5 Staffing Impacts of Unfunded Salary Programs Position Type 1% 3% 5% $325,000 $975,000 $1,625,000 Faculty 2.1 6.3 10.6 Area/District Specialist 3.1 9.3 15.5 County Educator 4.0 11.9 19.8 Campus Support Staff 5.9 17.7 29.5 County Support Staff 7.2 21.7 36.1

16% 14%

Cuts in the state budget,. when combined with
Cuts in the state budget, . when combined with . unfunded salary programs over . the period 2010 to 2017, . amounted to the equivalent of about a . 27% total budget decrease ($11 million)

10% budget cut and $1 million cut in expenditures
Flat budget and $1 million cut in expenditures 10% budget cut and constant expenditures

OCES Staffing - 2009 Off-Campus 360 On-Campus 154 Grant Funded Total
County Educator 204 District/Area Educators 33 Support Staff 123 On-Campus 154 Tenure Track Faculty 54 Administrators 5 Support Staff and NTT 95 Grant Funded Total 609 Part-time students not included

OCES Staffing - 2015 Off-Campus 348 On-Campus 139 Grant Funded 68
County Educator 202 District/Area Educators 25 Support Staff 121 On-Campus 139 Tenure Track Faculty 38 Administrators 5 Support Staff and NTT 96 Grant Funded 68 Total 555 Part-time students not included

OCES Staffing Changes 2009 to 2015
Off-Campus -3.3% County Educator -1.0% District/Area Educators -24.2% Support Staff -1.6% On-Campus -9.7% Tenure Track Faculty -29.6% Administrators 0.0% Support Staff and NTT +1.0% Grant Funded -28.4% Total -8.9% Part-time students not included

CHANGE ???????

CHANGE

“Currently” We have $34 million to invest

KEY QUESTION #2 Where do we invest $34 million?

Where have we been investing it?

Faculty & County & Staff Area/District Campus vs. Field
KEY QUESTION #2A Campus vs. Field Faculty & Staff County & Area/District

Where have we been investing it? Choice Campus Field
0% 14% 10% 55% 22%

Distribution of FY15 Funding
Campus Personnel and M&O 36.5% Tenure Track Faculty 16.7% (45.8% of Campus Budget) Support Staff 13.1% (35.9% of Campus Budget) Administration 6.7% (18.3% of Campus Budget) Field Personnel and M&O 63.5% Counties 54.3% (85.6% of Field Budget) Area/District 9.2% (14.4% of Field Budget)

Where have we been investing it?
Choice Campus Field 1 70 30 2 60 40 3 50 4 5

KEY QUESTION #2B Field Staff Ag FCS 4-H Other

KEY QUESTION #2B How do the program areas currently rank. Choice #1 #2
Ag FCS H Other Ag H FCS Other 4-H Ag FCS Other 4-H FCS Ag Other 10% 38% 40% 12%

FY15 Estimated County Field Budget Distribution
Program % of Budget Budget (millions) Agriculture 27.6% 6.21 FCS 27.4% 6.15 4-H 40.8% 9.17 Other 4.2% .94 Assumes the following: Ag FCS 4-H 2 Educator County 3 Educator County 4 plus Educator County (assume to be full time in their primary area) County Paid M&O of about $3.8 million is divided in proportion to FTEs in each program area

FY15 Estimated County Budget Distribution Including Nutrition
Program % of Budget Budget (millions) Agriculture 25.5% 6.21 FCS + Nutrition Ed 33.0% 8.03 4-H 37.6% 9.17 Other 3.9% .94

FY15 Estimated Area/district Field Budget Distribution
Program % of Budget Budget (millions) Agriculture 63.9% 1.96 FCS 19.1% .58 4-H 17.0% .52

FY15 Estimated Total Field Budget Distribution
Program % of Budget Budget (millions) Agriculture 29.8% 8.17 FCS + Nutrition Ed 31.4% 8.61 4-H 35.4% 9.69 Other 3.4% .94

How do the program areas currently rank?
KEY QUESTION #2B How do the program areas currently rank? Choice #1 #2 #3 #4 1 Ag FCS 4-H Other 2 3 4

KEY QUESTION #2C On Campus Ag FCS 4-H CD

KEY QUESTION #2C Which program area has the largest budget
KEY QUESTION #2C Which program area has the largest budget? Choice # # # #4 Ag FCS H CD Ag H FCS CD 4-H Ag FCS CD 4-H FCS Ag CD 76% 22% 0% 2%

FY15 Estimated Campus Budget Distribution
Program % of Budget Budget (millions) Agriculture 68.8% 8.61 FCS 13.2% 1.65 4-H 9.3% 1.17 CD 8.7% 1.08

Which program area has the largest budget?
KEY QUESTION #2C Which program area has the largest budget? Choice # #1 #2 #3 #4 Ag FCS 4-H CD

Total Extension Program
KEY QUESTION #2D Total Extension Program Ag FCS 4-H CD

FY15 Estimated Total OCES Budget Distribution
Program % of Budget Budget (millions) Agriculture 42.0% 16.78 FCS 25.7% 10.27 4-H 27.2% 10.87 CD 5.1% 2.02

GEOGRAPHY OF OKLAHOMA

How diverse is our State?

2015 POPULATION BY COUNTY District % of Total NE 38.4% NW 7.2%
(Average = 50,797 Median = 22,004) WOODWARD 21,559 ADAIR 22,004 5,868 ALFALFA ATOKA 13,793 BECKHAM 23,768 BLAINE 9,833 BRYAN 44,884 CANADIAN 133,378 CARTER 48,689 48,447 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 14,997 CIMARRON 2,216 CLEVELAND 274,458 COMANCHE 124,648 COTTON 5,996 CRAIG 14,818 CUSTER 29,744 41,459 DELAWARE DEWEY 4,995 ELLIS 4,321 GARFIELD 63,569 GRADY 54,648 GRANT 4,523 GREER 6,070 2,788 HARMON HARPER 3,754 JACKSON 25,574 JEFFERSON 6,276 KAY 45,336 KIOWA 9,144 LATIMER 10,483 LOVE 9,870 MAYES 40,887 MURRAY 13,936 MUSKOGEE 69,699 NOBLE 11,554 10,539 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 776,864 OKMULGEE 39,187 OSAGE 47,887 OTTAWA 31,981 PAWNEE 16,436 PAYNE 80,850 PUSHMATAHA 11,183 ROGER MILLS 3,788 ROGERS 90,802 SEQUOYAH 41,153 STEPHENS 44,581 TILLMAN 7,515 TULSA 639,242 WAGONER 76,559 WASHITA 11,661 WOODS 9,304 WASHINGTON 52,021 MARSHALL 16,232 MAJOR 7.771 KINGFISHER 15,584 BEAVER 5,427 TEXAS 21,489 LOGAN 45,996 CREEK 70,892 LINCOLN 35,042 OKFUSKEE 12,181 McINTOSH 19,990 CADDO 29,343 MCCLAIN 38,066 GARVIN 27,755 25,548 SEMINOLE 71,875 POTTAWATOMIE 13,735 HUGHES PITTSBURG 44,610 HASKELL 12,845 LE FLORE 49,605 COAL 5,651 JOHNSTON 10,980 PONTOTOC 38,194 McCURTAIN 33,048 Thousands of People 2 - 5 6 - 10 45 -64 65 – 776 District % of Total NE % NW % SW % SE %

Number of Farms in Oklahoma by County (2012)
(Total # = 80,250 Average #/County = 1,042 Median #/County = 1,018 ) WOODWARD 882 1129 ADAIR 645 ALFALFA ATOKA 1103 BECKHAM 1016 BLAINE 798 BRYAN 1485 CANADIAN 1307 CARTER 1321 1233 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 965 CIMARRON 554 CLEVELAND 1081 COMANCHE 1107 COTTON 500 CRAIG 1263 CUSTER 877 1345 DELAWARE DEWEY 743 ELLIS 760 GARFIELD 1098 GRADY 1666 GRANT 801 GREER 498 366 HARMON HARPER 532 JACKSON 694 JEFFERSON 417 KAY 993 KIOWA 667 LATIMER 691 LOVE 621 MAYES 1553 MURRAY 472 MUSKOGEE 1735 NOBLE 828 889 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 1180 OKMULGEE OSAGE 1325 OTTAWA 1020 PAWNEE 813 PAYNE 1466 PUSHMATAHA 732 ROGER MILLS 678 ROGERS 1733 SEQUOYAH 1204 STEPHENS 1286 TILLMAN 556 1036 TULSA WAGONER 1090 WASHITA 973 WOODS 751 WASHINGTON 811 MARSHALL 525 MAJOR 901 KINGFISHER 1021 BEAVER TEXAS 1024 LOGAN 1203 CREEK 1777 LINCOLN 2121 OKFUSKEE 881 McINTOSH 1018 CADDO 1461 MCCLAIN 1239 GARVIN 1498 SEMINOLE 1054 1643 POTTAWATOMIE 921 HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL 864 1843 LE FLORE COAL 571 JOHNSTON PONTOTOC 1313 McCURTAIN 1577 # of Farms Less than 650 800 – 949 950 – 1,049 1, ,249 1,250 – 1,489 1,490+ District # of Farms % of Total NE 26, % NW 14, % SE 19, % SW 19, %

Number of Farms With Sales Over $50,000
(Total # = 13,280 Average/County = Median/County = 158) WOODWARD 215 168 ADAIR 313 ALFALFA ATOKA 100 BECKHAM 155 BLAINE 300 BRYAN CANADIAN 327 CARTER 114 99 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW CIMARRON 195 236,452 CLEVELAND COMANCHE 176 COTTON 169 CRAIG 212 CUSTER 295 252 DELAWARE DEWEY 191 ELLIS 181 GARFIELD 426 GRADY 274 GRANT 296 GREER 153 104 HARMON HARPER JACKSON 190 JEFFERSON 145 KAY 256 KIOWA 272 LATIMER 66 LOVE 82 MAYES 166 MURRAY 43 MUSKOGEE 159 NOBLE 210 121 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 78 103 OKMULGEE OSAGE 223 OTTAWA 127 PAWNEE 118 PAYNE 125 PUSHMATAHA 60 ROGER MILLS 158 ROGERS 162 SEQUOYAH 95 STEPHENS 138 TILLMAN 220 TULSA WAGONER 93 WASHITA 356 WOODS 258 WASHINGTON 938 MARSHALL 64 MAJOR 301 KINGFISHER 402 BEAVER 225 TEXAS 265 LOGAN CREEK 77 LINCOLN 203 OKFUSKEE 87 McINTOSH 84 CADDO 369 MCCLAIN GARVIN 180 59 SEMINOLE 90 POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG 173 HASKELL 137 278 LE FLORE COAL 101 JOHNSTON 79 92 PONTOTOC McCURTAIN # of Farms Under 84 84– 103 275+ Cleveland 11 District % of Large Farms NE % NW % SE % SW %

Farm Cash Receipts by County (Millions – 2012)
Average = $ Median = $53.6 WOODWARD $116 ADAIR $164 $169 ALFALFA ATOKA $25 BECKHAM $44 BLAINE $138 BRYAN $61 CANADIAN $146 CARTER $33 $139 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW $47 CIMARRON $377 CLEVELAND $15 COMANCHE COTTON $64 CRAIG $97 CUSTER $103 $254 DELAWARE DEWEY $42 ELLIS $120 GARFIELD $152 GRADY GRANT GREER $54 HARMON HARPER $149 JACKSON $53 JEFFERSON $82 KAY $87 KIOWA $108 LATIMER LOVE $24 MAYES $76 MURRAY $28 MUSKOGEE $51 NOBLE $40 NOWATA OKLAHOMA $20 $27 OKMULGEE OSAGE $121 OTTAWA $118 PAWNEE PAYNE $34 PUSHMATAHA ROGER MILLS $46 ROGERS $66 SEQUOYAH $55 STEPHENS TILLMAN $102 $21 TULSA WAGONER WASHITA $115 WOODS $83 WASHINGTON $37 MARSHALL $18 MAJOR $105 KINGFISHER $162 BEAVER $187 TEXAS $1,014 LOGAN CREEK LINCOLN $39 OKFUSKEE $35 McINTOSH $22 CADDO $129 MCCLAIN $48 GARVIN $45 $38 SEMINOLE POTTAWATOMIE $90 HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL $98 $287 LE FLORE COAL JOHNSTON $36 PONTOTOC McCURTAIN $163 Farm Cash Receipts (Millions – 2012) Under $25 $25 - $36 $37 - $44 $45 -$55 $55 - $124 $125 - $149 $150 + District % Cash Receipts NE % NW % SE % SW %

Value of Livestock Sales by County (Millions - 2012)
(Total – $5,264 Average/County – $68.4 Median – $34.8) WOODWARD $101 $162 ADAIR $107 ALFALFA ATOKA $20 BECKHAM $25 BLAINE $96 BRYAN $41 CANADIAN $94 CARTER $27 $34 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW CIMARRON $311 CLEVELAND $8 COMANCHE $30 COTTON $35 CRAIG $86 CUSTER $53 $250 DELAWARE DEWEY $21 ELLIS $106 GARFIELD $58 GRADY $120 GRANT $26 GREER $13 HARMON HARPER $135 JACKSON $11 JEFFERSON $76 KAY $29 KIOWA $44 LATIMER $22 LOVE $19 MAYES $70 MURRAY MUSKOGEE NOBLE $32 NOWATA OKLAHOMA $6 OKMULEE OSAGE $114 OTTAWA $67 PAWNEE $23 PAYNE PUSHMATAHA ROGER MILLS $33 $59 ROGERS SEQUOYAH $43 STEPHENS $37 TILLMAN $47 TULSA WAGONER $14 WASHITA $52 WOODS WASHINGTON MARSHALL $15 MAJOR $64 KINGFISHER $98 BEAVER $154 TEXAS $862 LOGAN CREEK LINCOLN $28 OKFUSKEE McINTOSH CADDO $68 MCCLAIN $36 GARVIN SEMINOLE POTTAWATOMIE $85 HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL $268 LE FLORE COAL $18 JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN $151 Livestock Sales (millions) Less Than 10 $200-$225 $225-$250 $31-$41 $41-$67 $68-$106 $107+ District % of Livestock Sale NE % NW % SE % SW %

Crop Sales by County (Millions – 2012)
Total = $1,865 Average/County = $24.2 Median/County = $13.1 WOODWARD $16 ADAIR $3 $62 ALFALFA ATOKA $4 BECKHAM $19 BLAINE $42 BRYAN CANADIAN $52 CARTER $6 $105 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW CIMARRON $66 CLEVELAND COMANCHE $17 COTTON $30 CRAIG $12 CUSTER $50 $5 DELAWARE DEWEY $21 ELLIS $13 GARFIELD $94 GRADY GRANT $71 GREER $20 $28 HARMON HARPER $14 JACKSON JEFFERSON KAY $58 KIOWA $64 LATIMER $2 LOVE MAYES MURRAY MUSKOGEE NOBLE NOWATA OKLAHOMA $15 $8 OKMULGEE OSAGE OTTAWA $51 PAWNEE PAYNE $9 PUSHMATAHA $1 ROGER MILLS ROGERS SEQUOYAH STEPHENS TILLMAN $55 TULSA WAGONER WASHITA WOODS $35 WASHINGTON $7 MARSHALL MAJOR $41 KINGFISHER $63 BEAVER $33 TEXAS $152 LOGAN CREEK LINCOLN $10 OKFUSKEE McINTOSH CADDO $60 MCCLAIN GARVIN SEMINOLE POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL LE FLORE COAL JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN Crop Sales (Millions of $s) Less Than $4 $4-$6 $6-$11 $12-$17 $17-$29 $30-$57 $58 + Cleveland $7 District % of Crop Sales NE % NW % SE % SW %

Net Income Per Farm by County - 2012
Average = $15,029 Median = $7,504 WOODWARD $17,277 ADAIR $50,765 ALFALFA ATOKA -$1,921 BECKHAM BLAINE $278,795 BRYAN $421 CANADIAN $16,034 CARTER -$5,037 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW $1,498 CIMARRON $96,415 CLEVELAND -$5,768 COMANCHE $1,000 COTTON $28,088 CRAIG CUSTER $21,533 $17,434 DELAWARE DEWEY $12,622 ELLIS $68,453 GARFIELD $35,559 GRADY GRANT $40,366 GREER $14,280 $42,242 HARMON HARPER $35,725 JACKSON $30,836 JEFFERSON $22,696 KAY $23,894 KIOWA $47,732 LATIMER $133 LOVE -$608 MAYES -$1,739 MURRAY -$21,265 MUSKOGEE $3,185 NOBLE $19,672 NOWATA OKLAHOMA - $3,899 -$3,670 OKMULGEE OSAGE $14,376 OTTAWA $31,219 PAWNEE -$2,448 PAYNE $2,166 PUSHMATAHA - $4,772 ROGER MILLS $12,944 ROGERS $1,860 SEQUOYAH STEPHENS 1$2,837 TILLMAN $45,942 -3,853 TULSA WAGONER $2,925 WASHITA $26,752 WOODS $26,456 WASHINGTON MARSHALL #3,367 MAJOR $20,165 KINGFISHER BEAVER $30,428 TEXAS $149,446 LOGAN -$2,823 CREEK -4,541 LINCOLN -$2,840 OKFUSKEE -$2,258 McINTOSH -$4,509 CADDO MCCLAIN $2,498 GARVIN $40 $12,913 SEMINOLE -$2,790 POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG -$3,840 HASKELL $29,221 $30,970 LE FLORE COAL $1552 JOHNSTON $630 -$1,592 PONTOTOC McCURTAIN $35,238 Net Income Per Farm Under -$2,840 -$2,840 - $99 $100 - $3,399 $3,400 - $12,599 $12,600 – $21,999 $22,000 – $34,999 $35,000+ District Average NE $ 4,106 NW $39,044 SE $ 4,390 SW $16,287

Harvested Crop Acres by County (2012)
(Total = 8,074,733 Average/County = 104,867 Median/County = 68,052) WOODWARD 82,213 37,201 ADAIR 276,936 ALFALFA ATOKA 44,776 BECKHAM 84,842 BLAINE 188,974 BRYAN ,498 CANADIAN 218,216 CARTER 42,806 33,731 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 50,131 CIMARRON 259,145 CLEVELAND COMANCHE 97,072 COTTON 143,329 CRAIG 92,670 CUSTER 215,620 52,373 DELAWARE DEWEY 109,368 ELLIS 73,139 GARFIELD 365,265 GRADY ,507 GRANT 316,378 GREER 101,725 HARMON ,390 HARPER 88,487 JACKSON 214,.032 JEFFERSON 32,627 KAY 258,726 KIOWA 261,982 LATIMER 31,589 LOVE 27,807 MAYES 67,685 MURRAY 16,742 MUSKOGEE 100,369 NOBLE 150,505 53,309 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 33,466 64,263 OKMULGEE OSAGE 68,529 OTTAWA 80,257 PAWNEE 34,397 PAYNE 66,074 PUSHMATAHA 22,869 ROGER MILLS 67,066 ROGERS 61,573 SEQUOYAH 54,615 STEPHENS 42,098 TILLMAN 216,982 TULSA 37,053 WAGONER 68,052 WASHITA 285,798 WOODS 165,341 WASHINGTON 48,050 MARSHALL 24,042 MAJOR 159,884 KINGFISHER 272,367 BEAVER 145,259 TEXAS 357,861 LOGAN 92,950 CREEK 47,383 LINCOLN 77,846 OKFUSKEE 36,619 McINTOSH 44,533 CADDO ,278 58,909 MCCLAIN GARVIN 74,154 SEMINOLE 33,807 58,493 POTTAWATOMIE 44,874 HUGHES PITTSBURG 61,070 HASKELL 37,677 83,820 LE FLORE COAL 38,057 JOHNSTON 30,085 44,919 PONTOTOC McCURTAIN 57,559 Crop Acres Less Than 34,000 35, ,00 45, ,000 62, ,000 82,000 – 106,000 107, ,000 215,000+ Cleveland 29,648 District % of Crop Acres NE % NW % SE % SW %

Number of Farms Harvesting Over 50 Acres by County (2012)
(Average = 291 Median = 266 ) WOODWARD 201 257 ADAIR 413 ALFALFA ATOKA 268 BECKHAM 213 BLAINE 454 BRYAN 395 CANADIAN 492 CARTER 238 CHEROKEE 228 CHOCTAW 247 CIMARRON 202 CLEVELAND 152 COMANCHE 290 COTTON 233 CRAIG 442 CUSTER 412 291 DELAWARE DEWEY ELLIS 192 GARFIELD 613 GRADY 431 GRANT 460 GREER 230 143 HARMON HARPER 163 JACKSON 289 JEFFERSON 125 KAY KIOWA 378 LATIMER LOVE 127 MAYES 351 MURRAY 92 MUSKOGEE 424 NOBLE 328 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 161 324 OKMULGEE OSAGE 265 OTTAWA 261 PAWNEE PAYNE 283 PUSHMATAHA 164 ROGER MILLS ROGERS 357 SEQUOYAH 259 STEPHENS TILLMAN 307 185 TULSA WAGONER 232 WASHITA 536 WOODS WASHINGTON 190 MARSHALL 102 MAJOR 420 KINGFISHER 573 BEAVER 212 TEXAS 343 LOGAN 358 CREEK 266 LINCOLN 415 OKFUSKEE 200 McINTOSH 241 CADDO 611 MCCLAIN GARVIN 338 216 SEMINOLE 301 POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG 379 HASKELL 246 LE FLORE 436 COAL 189 JOHNSTON 187 PONTOTOC 288 McCURTAIN 292 # of Farms Below 175 425 + Average # of District % of Farms Farms Per/County NE % NW % SE % SW %

Number of Farms by County with Over 20 Head of Beef Cattle (2012)
WOODWARD 377 ADAIR 495 280 ALFALFA ATOKA 485 BECKHAM 350 BLAINE 397 BRYAN 650 CANADIAN 449 CARTER 446 CHEROKEE 430 CHOCTAW 498 CIMARRON 145 CLEVELAND 197 COMANCHE COTTON 258 CRAIG 660 CUSTER 384 612 DELAWARE DEWEY 345 ELLIS 298 GARFIELD 497 GRADY 690 GRANT 230 GREER 195 139 HARMON HARPER 216 JACKSON 201 JEFFERSON 248 KAY 288 KIOWA 306 LATIMER 273 LOVE 231 MAYES 620 MURRAY 188 MUSKOGEE 646 NOBLE 346 408 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 202 OKMULGEE 400 OSAGE 557 OTTAWA 387 PAWNEE 300 PAYNE 411 PUSHMATAHA 299 ROGER MILLS 337 ROGERS 506 SEQUOYAH 393 STEPHENS 464 TILLMAN 211 TULSA WAGONER 347 WASHITA 467 WOODS 330 WASHINGTON 247 MARSHALL 198 MAJOR 404 KINGFISHER 524 BEAVER 318 TEXAS LOGAN 424 CREEK 425 LINCOLN 674 OKFUSKEE 382 McINTOSH 410 CADDO 732 MCCLAIN 362 GARVIN 342 SEMINOLE 416 POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG 611 HASKELL 431 LE FLORE 744 COAL 269 JOHNSTON 292 PONTOTOC McCURTAIN 658 # of Farms Less Than 224 600+ District % of Total NE % NW % SW % SE %

% of Cash Receipts from Livestock
(Average = 70.5% Median = 77.0%) WOODWARD 86.6 98.5% ADAIR 63.3% ALFALFA ATOKA 82.9% BECKHAM 56.5% BLAINE 69.8% BRYAN 68.1% CANADIAN 64.3% CARTER 83.0% 24.2% CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 86.8% CIMARRON 82.6% CLEVELAND 55.3% COMANCHE 64.1% COTTON 54.0 CRAIG 88.1% CUSTER 51.7% 98.2% DELAWARE DEWEY 50.3% ELLIS 89% GARFIELD 38.2% GRADY 86.2% GRANT 26.6% GREER 38.5% 48.3% HARMON HARPER 90.6% JACKSON 21.3% JEFFERSON 92.5 KAY 33.5% KIOWA 40.9% LATIMER 91.5 LOVE 80.5% MAYES 92% MURRAY 91.8% MUSKOGEE 57.7% NOBLE 51.6% 87.7% NOWATA OKLAHOMA 29.0% 72.3% OKMULGEE OSAGE 93.8% OTTAWA 56.9% PAWNEE 85,4% PAYNE 73.5% PUSHMATAHA 90.3% ROGER MILLS 71.9 83.3% ROGERS SEQUOYAH 77.0% STEPHENS 87.5% TILLMAN 46.3% 29.7% TULSA WAGONER $42.2 WASHITA 45.7% WOODS 57.0% WASHINGTON 80.8% MARSHALL 79.2% MAJOR 60.8% KINGFISHER BEAVER 82.4% TEXAS 85% LOGAN 52.8% CREEK 81.0% LINCOLN 73.2% OKFUSKEE 86.7% McINTOSH 86.9% CADDO 53.1% 73.8% MCCLAIN GARVIN 61.8 89.6% SEMINOLE 76.0% POTTAWATOMIE 93.9% HUGHES PITTSBURG 84.3% HASKELL 97.5% 93.4% LE FLORE COAL 81.5% JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN 92.8 Percent Less Than 46% 46% - 57% 58% - 72% 72% - 81% 82% - 87% 87% - 91% 92%+

Oklahoma Class II UIC Wells
Charles Lord 12/22/2008

4-H Club Members District % of Total NE 32.9% NW 16.1% SW 25.5%
WOODWARD 151 ADAIR 550 107 ALFALFA ATOKA 77 BECKHAM 167 BLAINE 119 BRYAN 229 CANADIAN 395 CARTER 190 424 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 130 CIMARRON 64 CLEVELAND 246 COMANCHE 291 COTTON CRAIG 169 CUSTER 185 249 DELAWARE DEWEY 128 ELLIS 131 GARFIELD 242 GRADY 305 GRANT GREER 85 99 HARMON HARPER 114 JACKSON 175 JEFFERSON 101 KAY KIOWA 93 LATIMER 83 LOVE 198 MAYES 171 MURRAY 192 MUSKOGEE NOBLE 187 30 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 398 OKMULGEE 118 OSAGE 212 OTTAWA 268 PAWNEE 140 PAYNE 412 PUSHMATAHA 238 ROGER MILLS 122 ROGERS 253 SEQUOYAH 233 STEPHENS TILLMAN 87 326 TULSA WAGONER 138 WASHITA 152 WOODS WASHINGTON 202 MARSHALL 335 MAJOR 330 KINGFISHER 228 BEAVER TEXAS LOGAN 195 CREEK 364 LINCOLN 355 OKFUSKEE 163 McINTOSH 302 CADDO 399 MCCLAIN 155 GARVIN 351 156 SEMINOLE 260 POTTAWATOMIE 218 HUGHES PITTSBURG 714 HASKELL LE FLORE 181 COAL 80 JOHNSTON 217 PONTOTOC 288 McCURTAIN 205 # of 4-H Club Members 30-104 331+ District % of Total NE % NW % SW % SE %

2015 POPULATION BY COUNTY District % of Total NE 38.4% NW 7.2%
(Average = 50,797 Median = 22,004) WOODWARD 21,559 ADAIR 22,004 5,868 ALFALFA ATOKA 13,793 BECKHAM 23,768 BLAINE 9,833 BRYAN 44,884 CANADIAN 133,378 CARTER 48,689 48,447 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 14,997 CIMARRON 2,216 CLEVELAND 274,458 COMANCHE 124,648 COTTON 5,996 CRAIG 14,818 CUSTER 29,744 41,459 DELAWARE DEWEY 4,995 ELLIS 4,321 GARFIELD 63,569 GRADY 54,648 GRANT 4,523 GREER 6,070 2,788 HARMON HARPER 3,754 JACKSON 25,574 JEFFERSON 6,276 KAY 45,336 KIOWA 9,144 LATIMER 10,483 LOVE 9,870 MAYES 40,887 MURRAY 13,936 MUSKOGEE 69,699 NOBLE 11,554 10,539 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 776,864 OKMULGEE 39,187 OSAGE 47,887 OTTAWA 31,981 PAWNEE 16,436 PAYNE 80,850 PUSHMATAHA 11,183 ROGER MILLS 3,788 ROGERS 90,802 SEQUOYAH 41,153 STEPHENS 44,581 TILLMAN 7,515 TULSA 639,242 WAGONER 76,559 WASHITA 11,661 WOODS 9,304 WASHINGTON 52,021 MARSHALL 16,232 MAJOR 7.771 KINGFISHER 15,584 BEAVER 5,427 TEXAS 21,489 LOGAN 45,996 CREEK 70,892 LINCOLN 35,042 OKFUSKEE 12,181 McINTOSH 19,990 CADDO 29,343 MCCLAIN 38,066 GARVIN 27,755 25,548 SEMINOLE 71,875 POTTAWATOMIE 13,735 HUGHES PITTSBURG 44,610 HASKELL 12,845 LE FLORE 49,605 COAL 5,651 JOHNSTON 10,980 PONTOTOC 38,194 McCURTAIN 33,048 Thousands of People 2 - 5 6 - 10 45 -64 65 – 776 District % of Total NE % NW % SW % SE %

% of Eligible Youth in 4-H Clubs (2012)
WOODWARD 4.2 ADAIR 13.1 14.3 ALFALFA ATOKA 3.6 BECKHAM BLAINE 7.2 BRYAN 3.3 CANADIAN 1.8 CARTER 2.3 5.2 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 5.4 CIMARRON 17.1 CLEVELAND 0.6 COMANCHE 1.4 COTTON 12.4 CRAIG 7.9 CUSTER 3.9 DELAWARE DEWEY 15.6 ELLIS 20.0 GARFIELD GRADY 3.5 GRANT 17.0 GREER 10.9 20.7 HARMON HARPER 17.9 JACKSON JEFFERSON 10.0 KAY KIOWA 6.3 LATIMER LOVE 12.1 MAYES 2.6 MURRAY 15.7 MUSKOGEE 2.5 NOBLE 10.2 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 0.3 OKMULGEE 1.9 OSAGE 2.9 OTTAWA 5.0 PAWNEE 5.3 PAYNE 4.0 PUSHMATAHA 14.6 ROGER MILLS 19.4 ROGERS 1.7 SEQUOYAH STEPHENS TILLMAN 7.0 TULSA WAGONER 1.1 WASHITA 7.6 WOODS WASHINGTON MARSHALL 13.4 MAJOR 26.4 KINGFISHER 8.5 BEAVER TEXAS LOGAN 2.7 CREEK 3.2 LINCOLN 6.4 OKFUSKEE 8.1 McINTOSH CADDO MCCLAIN 2.4 GARVIN 7.8 SEMINOLE 2.2 POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG 10.7 HASKELL 7.3 LE FLORE COAL 8.3 JOHNSTON 12.7 PONTOTOC 4.8 McCURTAIN % of Youth in 4-H 3.2 – 0.3 2.3 – 3.2 3.3 – 4.2 4.8 – 7.1 10.2 – 14.2 District Average % NE % NW % SW % SE %

Number of County Educators (FY16)
WOODWARD ADAIR ALFALFA ATOKA BECKHAM BLAINE BRYAN CANADIAN CARTER CHEROKEE CHOCTAW CIMARRON CLEVELAND COMANCHE COTTON CRAIG CUSTER DELAWARE DEWEY ELLIS GARFIELD GRADY GRANT GREER HARMON HARPER JACKSON JEFFERSON KAY KIOWA LATIMER LOVE MAYES MURRAY MUSKOGEE NOBLE NOWATA OKLAHOMA OKMULGEE OSAGE OTTAWA PAWNEE PAYNE PUSHMATAHA ROGER MILLS ROGERS SEQUOYAH STEPHENS TILLMAN TULSA WAGONER WASHITA WOODS WASHINGTON MARSHALL MAJOR KINGFISHER BEAVER TEXAS LOGAN CREEK LINCOLN OKFUSKEE McINTOSH CADDO MCCLAIN GARVIN SEMINOLE POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL LE FLORE COAL JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN # of Educators 1 2 3 4 5 7

The previous 16 slides show that there is significant diversity among counties. This leads to the question?

KEY QUESTION #3 Are we allocating resources to counties “optimally”
??????

County to County Differences The “House Model” vs. the “Senate Model”
Diversity of Counties County to County Differences The “House Model” vs. the “Senate Model”

KEY QUESTION #3 County to County The “House Model” vs
KEY QUESTION #3 County to County The “House Model” vs. the “Senate Model” INDEXING APPROACH

Example Index (Step 1 – Ag index)
# of Farms* Farm Sales* Composite Ag County #1 5 16 11.0 County #2 45 30 37.5 *Values are Rankings from 1 to 77 with 1 being for the highest number.

Example Index (Step 2 – Three Way Index)
Ag Composite Population Income per family Total Composite County #1 11.0 40 20 23.7 County #2 37.5 30 35 34.2 *Values are Rankings from 1 to 77 with 1 being for the highest number except for Income where 1 is for the lowest income.

Example Index (Step 3 – Allocation)
1) Currently allocate about $150,000 per county 2) Index Allocation = $150,000 + (39 – Index) x $3,845 Average Index = 39 Minimum Index = 11.8 Maximum Index = 66.3 Dollars/Index Point = $150,000/39 = $3,845

EXAMPLE OF OCES BUDGET ALLOCATION
BY INDEXING ON AG, POPULATION AND INCOME WOODWARD ADAIR ALFALFA ATOKA BECKHAM BLAINE BRYAN CANADIAN CARTER CHEROKEE CHOCTAW CIMARRON CLEVELAND COMANCHE COTTON CRAIG CUSTER DELAWARE DEWEY ELLIS GARFIELD GRADY GRANT GREER HARMON HARPER JACKSON JEFFERSON KAY KIOWA LATIMER LOVE MAYES MURRAY MUSKOGEE NOBLE NOWATA OKLAHOMA OKMULGEE OSAGE OTTAWA PAWNEE PAYNE PUSHMATAHA ROGER MILLS ROGERS SEQUOYAH STEPHENS TILLMAN TULSA WAGONER WASHITA WOODS WASHINGTON MARSHALL MAJOR KINGFISHER BEAVER TEXAS LOGAN CREEK LINCOLN OKFUSKEE McINTOSH CADDO MCCLAIN GARVIN SEMINOLE POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL LE FLORE COAL JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN Thousands of Dollars Average=$150,000 Median = $146,154 Range = $45,000 to $254,000

The “House Model” vs. the “Senate Model”
KEY QUESTION #3 Area to Area The “House Model” vs. the “Senate Model” UNITIZATION APPROACH

Number of Farms Harvesting Over 50 Acres
(Average = 291 Median = 266 ) WOODWARD 201 257 ADAIR 413 ALFALFA ATOKA 268 BECKHAM 213 BLAINE 454 BRYAN 395 CANADIAN 492 CARTER 238 228 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 247 CIMARRON 202 CLEVELAND 152 COMANCHE 290 COTTON 233 CRAIG 442 CUSTER 412 291 DELAWARE DEWEY ELLIS 192 GARFIELD 613 GRADY 431 GRANT 460 GREER 230 143 HARMON HARPER 163 JACKSON 289 JEFFERSON 125 KAY KIOWA 378 LATIMER LOVE 127 MAYES 351 MURRAY 92 MUSKOGEE 424 NOBLE 328 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 161 324 OKMULGEE OSAGE 265 OTTAWA 261 PAWNEE PAYNE 283 PUSHMATAHA 164 ROGER MILLS ROGERS 357 SEQUOYAH 259 STEPHENS TILLMAN 307 185 TULSA WAGONER 232 WASHITA 536 WOODS WASHINGTON 190 MARSHALL 102 MAJOR 420 KINGFISHER 573 BEAVER 212 TEXAS 343 LOGAN 358 CREEK 266 LINCOLN 415 OKFUSKEE 200 McINTOSH 241 CADDO 611 MCCLAIN GARVIN 338 216 SEMINOLE 301 POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG 379 HASKELL 246 LE FLORE 436 COAL 189 JOHNSTON 187 PONTOTOC 288 McCURTAIN 292 # of Farms Below 175 425 + Average # of District % of Farms Farms Per/County NE % NW % SE % SW %

10 AREA AGRONOMIST UNITIZATION PLAN
(Based on # of Farms Harvesting Over 50 Acres) WOODWARD 201 257 ADAIR 413 ALFALFA ATOKA 268 BECKHAM 213 BLAINE 454 BRYAN 395 CANADIAN 492 CARTER 238 228 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 247 CIMARRON 202 CLEVELAND 152 COMANCHE 290 COTTON 233 CRAIG 442 CUSTER 412 291 DELAWARE DEWEY ELLIS 192 GARFIELD 613 GRADY 431 GRANT 460 GREER 230 143 HARMON HARPER 163 JACKSON 289 JEFFERSON 125 KAY KIOWA 378 LATIMER LOVE 127 MAYES 351 MURRAY 92 MUSKOGEE 424 NOBLE 328 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 161 324 OKMULGEE OSAGE 265 OTTAWA 261 PAWNEE PAYNE 283 PUSHMATAHA 164 ROGER MILLS ROGERS 357 SEQUOYAH 259 STEPHENS TILLMAN 307 185 TULSA WAGONER 232 WASHITA 536 WOODS WASHINGTON 190 MARSHALL 102 MAJOR 420 KINGFISHER 573 BEAVER 212 TEXAS 343 LOGAN 358 CREEK 266 LINCOLN 415 OKFUSKEE 200 McINTOSH 241 CADDO 611 MCCLAIN GARVIN 338 216 SEMINOLE 301 POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG 379 HASKELL 246 LE FLORE 436 COAL 189 JOHNSTON 187 PONTOTOC 288 McCURTAIN 292 1 8 4 Units Have Approximately 2,250 Farms 2 6 9 5 3 10 7 Average # of District % of Farms Farms Per/County NE 25.6% NW % SE 20.3% SW 26.7%

Crop Sales (Millions – 2012)
Total = $1,865 Average/County = $24.2 Median/County = $13.1 WOODWARD $16 $3 ADAIR $62 ALFALFA ATOKA $4 BECKHAM $19 BLAINE $42 BRYAN CANADIAN $52 CARTER $6 $105 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW CIMARRON $66 CLEVELAND COMANCHE $17 COTTON $30 CRAIG $12 CUSTER $50 $5 DELAWARE DEWEY $21 ELLIS $13 GARFIELD $94 GRADY GRANT $71 GREER $20 $28 HARMON HARPER $14 JACKSON JEFFERSON KAY $58 KIOWA $64 LATIMER $2 LOVE MAYES MURRAY MUSKOGEE NOBLE NOWATA OKLAHOMA $15 $8 OKMULGEE OSAGE OTTAWA $51 PAWNEE PAYNE $9 PUSHMATAHA $1 ROGER MILLS ROGERS SEQUOYAH STEPHENS TILLMAN $55 TULSA WAGONER WASHITA WOODS $35 WASHINGTON $7 MARSHALL MAJOR $41 KINGFISHER $63 BEAVER $33 TEXAS $152 LOGAN CREEK LINCOLN $10 OKFUSKEE McINTOSH CADDO $60 MCCLAIN GARVIN SEMINOLE POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL LE FLORE COAL JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN Crop Sales (Millions of $s) Less Than $4 $4-$6 $6-$11 $12-$17 $17-$29 $30-$57 $58 + Cleveland $7 District % of Crop Sales NE % NW % SE % SW %

AREA AGRONOMIST UNITIZATION PLAN
(Based on Crop Sales) WOODWARD $16 ADAIR $3 $62 ALFALFA ATOKA $4 BECKHAM $19 BLAINE $42 BRYAN CANADIAN $52 CARTER $6 $105 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW CIMARRON $66 CLEVELAND COMANCHE $17 COTTON $30 CRAIG $12 CUSTER $50 $5 DELAWARE DEWEY $21 ELLIS $13 GARFIELD $94 GRADY GRANT $71 GREER $20 $28 HARMON HARPER $14 JACKSON JEFFERSON KAY $58 KIOWA $64 LATIMER $2 LOVE MAYES MURRAY MUSKOGEE NOBLE NOWATA OKLAHOMA $15 $8 OKMULGEE OSAGE OTTAWA $51 PAWNEE PAYNE $9 PUSHMATAHA $1 ROGER MILLS ROGERS SEQUOYAH STEPHENS TILLMAN $55 TULSA WAGONER WASHITA WOODS $35 WASHINGTON $7 MARSHALL MAJOR $41 KINGFISHER $63 BEAVER $33 TEXAS $152 LOGAN CREEK LINCOLN $10 OKFUSKEE McINTOSH CADDO $60 MCCLAIN GARVIN SEMINOLE HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL LE FLORE COAL JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN 1 2 5 8 9 District % of Crop Sales NE % NW % SE % SW % 3 6 Cleveland $7 $8 POTTAWATOME McClain $13 7 4 10 Units have Approximately $180 Million in Crop Sales

# of Farms with Over 20 Head of Beef Cattle
WOODWARD 377 ADAIR 495 280 ALFALFA ATOKA 485 BECKHAM 350 BLAINE 397 BRYAN 650 CANADIAN 449 CARTER 446 CHEROKEE 430 CHOCTAW 498 CIMARRON 145 CLEVELAND 197 COMANCHE COTTON 258 CRAIG 660 CUSTER 384 612 DELAWARE DEWEY 345 ELLIS 298 GARFIELD 497 GRADY 690 GRANT 230 GREER 195 139 HARMON HARPER 216 JACKSON 201 JEFFERSON 248 KAY 288 KIOWA 306 LATIMER 273 LOVE 231 MAYES 620 MURRAY 188 MUSKOGEE 646 NOBLE 346 408 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 202 OKMULGEE 400 OSAGE 557 OTTAWA 387 PAWNEE 300 PAYNE 411 PUSHMATAHA 299 ROGER MILLS 337 ROGERS 506 SEQUOYAH 393 STEPHENS 464 TILLMAN 211 TULSA WAGONER 347 WASHITA 467 WOODS 330 WASHINGTON 247 MARSHALL 198 MAJOR 404 KINGFISHER 524 BEAVER 318 TEXAS LOGAN 424 CREEK 425 LINCOLN 674 OKFUSKEE 382 McINTOSH 410 CADDO 732 MCCLAIN 362 GARVIN 342 SEMINOLE 416 POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG 611 HASKELL 431 LE FLORE 744 COAL 269 JOHNSTON 292 PONTOTOC McCURTAIN 658 # of Farms Less Than 224 600+ District % of Total NE % NW % SW % SE %

10 AREA ANIMAL SCIENTIST UNITIZATION PLAN Units have approximately
(Based on # of Farms With Over 20 Head of Cattle) WOODWARD 377 495 ADAIR 280 ALFALFA ATOKA 485 BECKHAM 350 BLAINE 397 BRYAN 650 CANADIAN 449 CARTER 446 CHEROKEE 430 CHOCTAW 498 CIMARRON 145 CLEVELAND 197 COMANCHE COTTON 258 CRAIG 660 CUSTER 384 DELAWARE 612 DEWEY 345 ELLIS 298 GARFIELD 497 GRADY 690 GRANT 230 GREER 195 139 HARMON HARPER 216 JACKSON 201 JEFFERSON 248 KAY 288 KIOWA 306 LATIMER 273 LOVE 231 MAYES 620 MURRAY 188 MUSKOGEE 646 NOBLE 346 408 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 202 400 OKMULGEE OSAGE 557 OTTAWA 387 PAWNEE 300 PAYNE 411 PUSHMATAHA 299 ROGER MILLS 337 ROGERS 506 SEQUOYAH 393 STEPHENS 464 TILLMAN 211 TULSA WAGONER 347 WASHITA 467 WOODS 330 WASHINGTON 247 MARSHALL 198 MAJOR 404 KINGFISHER 524 BEAVER 318 TEXAS LOGAN 424 CREEK 425 LINCOLN 674 OKFUSKEE 382 McINTOSH 410 CADDO 732 MCCLAIN 362 GARVIN 342 SEMINOLE 416 POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG 611 HASKELL 431 LE FLORE 744 COAL 269 JOHNSTON 292 PONTOTOC McCURTAIN 658 3 8 1 Units have approximately 3,000 farms 6 9 4 2 10 5 7 Average # of District % of Farms_ Farms/County NE % NW % SW % SE %

4-H Club Members District % of Total NE 32.9% NW 16.1% SW 25.5%
WOODWARD 151 ADAIR 550 107 ALFALFA ATOKA 77 BECKHAM 167 BLAINE 119 BRYAN 229 CANADIAN 395 CARTER 190 CHEROKEE 424 CHOCTAW 130 CIMARRON 64 CLEVELAND 246 COMANCHE 291 COTTON CRAIG 169 CUSTER 185 249 DELAWARE DEWEY 128 ELLIS 131 GARFIELD 242 GRADY 305 GRANT GREER 85 99 HARMON HARPER 114 JACKSON 175 JEFFERSON 101 KAY KIOWA 93 LATIMER 83 LOVE 198 MAYES 171 MURRAY 192 MUSKOGEE NOBLE 187 30 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 398 OKMULGEE 118 OSAGE 212 OTTAWA 268 PAWNEE 140 PAYNE 412 PUSHMATAHA 238 ROGER MILLS 122 ROGERS 253 SEQUOYAH 233 STEPHENS TILLMAN 87 326 TULSA WAGONER 138 WASHITA 152 WOODS WASHINGTON 202 MARSHALL 335 MAJOR 330 KINGFISHER 228 BEAVER TEXAS LOGAN 195 CREEK 364 LINCOLN 355 OKFUSKEE 163 McINTOSH 302 CADDO 399 MCCLAIN 155 GARVIN 351 156 SEMINOLE 260 POTTAWATOMIE 218 HUGHES PITTSBURG 714 HASKELL LE FLORE 181 COAL 80 JOHNSTON 217 PONTOTOC 288 McCURTAIN 205 # of 4-H Members 30-104 331+ District % of Total NE % NW % SW % SE %

10 AREA 4-H MEMBER UNITIZATION PLAN
WOODWARD 151 ADAIR 550 107 ALFALFA ATOKA 77 BECKHAM 167 BLAINE 119 BRYAN 229 CANADIAN 395 CARTER 190 424 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 130 CIMARRON 64 CLEVELAND 246 COMANCHE 291 COTTON CRAIG 169 CUSTER 185 249 DELAWARE DEWEY 128 ELLIS 131 GARFIELD 242 GRADY 305 GRANT GREER 85 99 HARMON HARPER 114 JACKSON 175 JEFFERSON 101 KAY KIOWA 93 LATIMER 83 LOVE 198 MAYES 171 MURRAY 192 MUSKOGEE NOBLE 187 30 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 398 OKMULGEE 118 OSAGE 212 OTTAWA 268 PAWNEE 140 PAYNE 412 PUSHMATAHA 238 ROGER MILLS 122 ROGERS 253 SEQUOYAH 233 STEPHENS TILLMAN 87 326 TULSA WAGONER 138 WASHITA 152 WOODS WASHINGTON 202 MARSHALL 335 MAJOR 330 KINGFISHER 228 BEAVER TEXAS LOGAN 195 CREEK 364 LINCOLN 355 OKFUSKEE 163 McINTOSH 302 CADDO 399 MCCLAIN 155 GARVIN 351 156 SEMINOLE 260 POTTAWATOMIE 218 HUGHES PITTSBURG 714 HASKELL LE FLORE 181 COAL 80 JOHNSTON 217 PONTOTOC 288 McCURTAIN 205 1 3 6 Approximately 1,600 4-Hers per Unit 7 9 4 2 8 5 10 District % of Total NE % NW % SW % SE %

2015 POPULATION (Average = 50,797 Median = 22,004) District % of Total
WOODWARD 21,559 ADAIR 22,004 5,868 ALFALFA ATOKA 13,793 BECKHAM 23,768 BLAINE 9,833 BRYAN 44,884 CANADIAN 133,378 CARTER 48,689 48,447 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 14,997 CIMARRON 2,216 CLEVELAND 274,458 COMANCHE 124,648 COTTON 5,996 CRAIG 14,818 CUSTER 29,744 41,459 DELAWARE DEWEY 4,995 ELLIS 4,321 GARFIELD 63,569 GRADY 54,648 GRANT 4,523 GREER 6,070 2,788 HARMON HARPER 3,754 JACKSON 25,574 JEFFERSON 6,276 KAY 45,336 KIOWA 9,144 LATIMER 10,483 LOVE 9,870 MAYES 40,887 MURRAY 13,936 MUSKOGEE 69,699 NOBLE 11,554 10,539 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 776,864 OKMULGEE 39,187 OSAGE 47,887 OTTAWA 31,981 PAWNEE 16,436 PAYNE 80,850 PUSHMATAHA 11,183 ROGER MILLS 3,788 ROGERS 90,802 SEQUOYAH 41,153 STEPHENS 44,581 TILLMAN 7,515 TULSA 639,242 WAGONER 76,559 WASHITA 11,661 WOODS 9,304 WASHINGTON 52,021 MARSHALL 16,232 MAJOR 7.771 KINGFISHER 15,584 BEAVER 5,427 TEXAS 21,489 LOGAN 45,996 CREEK 70,892 LINCOLN 35,042 OKFUSKEE 12,181 McINTOSH 19,990 CADDO 29,343 MCCLAIN 38,066 GARVIN 27,755 25,548 SEMINOLE 71,875 POTTAWATOMIE 13,735 HUGHES PITTSBURG 44,610 HASKELL 12,845 LE FLORE 49,605 COAL 5,651 JOHNSTON 10,980 PONTOTOC 38,194 McCURTAIN 33,048 Thousands of People 2 - 5 6 - 10 45 -64 65 – 776 District % of Total NE % NW % SW % SE %

10 Area Population Unitization Plan
WOODWARD 21,559 ADAIR 22,004 5,868 ALFALFA ATOKA 13,793 BECKHAM 23,768 BLAINE 9,833 BRYAN 44,884 CANADIAN 133,378 CARTER 48,689 48,447 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 14,997 CIMARRON 2,216 CLEVELAND 274,458 COMANCHE 124,648 COTTON 5,996 CRAIG 14,818 CUSTER 29,744 41,459 DELAWARE DEWEY 4,995 ELLIS 4,321 GARFIELD 63,569 GRADY 54,648 GRANT 4,523 GREER 6,070 2,788 HARMON HARPER 3,754 JACKSON 25,574 JEFFERSON 6,276 KAY 45,336 KIOWA 9,144 LATIMER 10,483 LOVE 9,870 MAYES 40,887 MURRAY 13,936 MUSKOGEE 69,699 NOBLE 11,554 10,539 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 776,864 OKMULGEE 39,187 OSAGE 47,887 OTTAWA 31,981 PAWNEE 16,436 PAYNE 80,850 PUSHMATAHA 11,183 ROGER MILLS 3,788 ROGERS 90,802 SEQUOYAH 41,153 STEPHENS 44,581 TILLMAN 7,515 TULSA 639,242 WAGONER 76,559 WASHITA 11,661 WOODS 9,304 WASHINGTON 52,021 MARSHALL 16,232 MAJOR 7.771 KINGFISHER 15,584 BEAVER 5,427 TEXAS 21,489 LOGAN 45,996 CREEK 70,892 LINCOLN 35,042 OKFUSKEE 12,181 McINTOSH 19,990 CADDO 29,343 MCCLAIN 38,066 GARVIN 27,755 25,548 SEMINOLE 71,875 POTTAWATOMIE 13,735 HUGHES PITTSBURG 44,610 HASKELL 12,845 LE FLORE 49,605 COAL 5,651 JOHNSTON 10,980 PONTOTOC 38,194 McCURTAIN 33,048 6 3&4 9 Approximately 391,000 People Per Unit 1&2 5 7 8 District % of Total NE % NW % SW % SE % 10 Oklahoma County = 2 Units Tulsa + Rogers + Washington = 2 Units

Experimental County Population Clusters
(Single County >65,000; 2 County Cluster >50,000; 3 County Cluster <50,000) WOODWARD 19,505 ADAIR 21,902 5,593 ALFALFA ATOKA 14,512 BECKHAM 19,700 BLAINE 12,475 BRYAN 39,536 CANADIAN 103,559 CARTER 47,582 45,393 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 15,011 CIMARRON 2,664 CLEVELAND 236,452 COMANCHE 113,811 COTTON 6,299 CRAIG 15,195 CUSTER 26,111 40,406 DELAWARE DEWEY 4,338 ELLIS 3,911 GARFIELD 57,657 GRADY 50,615 GRANT 4,497 GREER 5,810 2,837 HARMON HARPER 3,254 JACKSON 25,778 JEFFERSON 6,273 KAY 45,638 KIOWA 9,456 LATIMER 10,508 LOVE 9,112 MAYES 39,627 MURRAY 12,695 MUSKOGEE 71,116 NOBLE 11,124 10,723 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 701,807 39,300 OKMULGEE OSAGE 45,523 OTTAWA 32,474 PAWNEE 16,477 PAYNE 79,931 PUSHMATAHA 11,666 ROGER MILLS 3,308 ROGERS 83,105 SEQUOYAH 41,024 STEPHENS 43,322 TILLMAN 8,148 585,068 TULSA WAGONER 67,239 WASHITA 11,667 WOODS 8,319 WASHINGTON 49,888 MARSHALL 14,830 MAJOR 7,109 KINGFISHER 14,320 BEAVER 5,380 TEXAS 20,032 LOGAN 36,435 CREEK 69,073 LINCOLN 32,272 OKFUSKEE 11,248 McINTOSH 19,709 CADDO 29,269 MCCLAIN 31,849 GARVIN 27,141 SEMINOLE 24,179 69,038 POTTAWATOMIE 13,680 HUGHES PITTSBURG 44,711 HASKELL 12,059 49,715 LE FLORE COAL 5,709 JOHNSTON 10,402 PONTOTOC McCURTAIN 33,539 Cleveland 1 County Unit 2 County Unit 3 County Unit Total Units

CURRENT OCES BUDGET GEOGRAPHY

Number of County Educators (FY16)
WOODWARD ADAIR ALFALFA ATOKA BECKHAM BLAINE BRYAN CANADIAN CARTER CHEROKEE CHOCTAW CIMARRON CLEVELAND COMANCHE COTTON CRAIG CUSTER DELAWARE DEWEY ELLIS GARFIELD GRADY GRANT GREER HARMON HARPER JACKSON JEFFERSON KAY KIOWA LATIMER LOVE MAYES MURRAY MUSKOGEE NOBLE NOWATA OKLAHOMA OKMULGEE OSAGE OTTAWA PAWNEE PAYNE PUSHMATAHA ROGER MILLS ROGERS SEQUOYAH STEPHENS TILLMAN TULSA WAGONER WASHITA WOODS WASHINGTON MARSHALL MAJOR KINGFISHER BEAVER TEXAS LOGAN CREEK LINCOLN OKFUSKEE McINTOSH CADDO MCCLAIN GARVIN SEMINOLE POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL LE FLORE COAL JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN # of Educators 1 2 3 4 5 7

Projected FY16 Total County Budget – (OSU + County Funds) (Average = $291,000 Median = $259,000)
WOODWARD ADAIR ALFALFA ATOKA BECKHAM BLAINE BRYAN CANADIAN CARTER CHEROKEE CHOCTAW CIMARRON CLEVELAND COMANCHE COTTON CRAIG CUSTER DELAWARE DEWEY ELLIS GARFIELD GRADY GRANT GREER HARMON HARPER JACKSON JEFFERSON KAY KIOWA LATIMER LOVE MAYES MURRAY MUSKOGEE NOBLE NOWATA OKLAHOMA OKMULGEE OSAGE OTTAWA PAWNEE PAYNE PUSHMATAHA ROGER MILLS ROGERS SEQUOYAH STEPHENS TILLMAN TULSA WAGONER WASHITA WOODS WASHINGTON MARSHALL MAJOR KINGFISHER BEAVER TEXAS LOGAN CREEK LINCOLN OKFUSKEE McINTOSH CADDO MCCLAIN GARVIN SEMINOLE POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL LE FLORE COAL JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN Total County Budget ($1,000) $100-$200 $200-$225 $225-$250 $250-$300 $300-$350 $350-$400 $400+

FY16 Total County Budget (OSU + County) Per Capita
(Average = $ Median = $11.21) WOODWARD 16 10 ADAIR 41 ALFALFA ATOKA 15 BECKHAM 9 BLAINE 22 BRYAN 6 CANADIAN 4 CARTER CHEROKEE 7 CHOCTAW 17 CIMARRON 58 CLEVELAND 2 COMANCHE 3 COTTON 52 CRAIG CUSTER DELAWARE DEWEY 43 ELLIS 61 GARFIELD 5 GRADY GRANT 47 GREER 37 46 HARMON HARPER 66 JACKSON 8 JEFFERSON 33 KAY KIOWA 23 LATIMER 12 LOVE 21 MAYES MURRAY 18 MUSKOGEE NOBLE 27 20 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 1 OKMULGEE OSAGE OTTAWA PAWNEE PAYNE PUSHMATAHA ROGER MILLS 57 ROGERS SEQUOYAH STEPHENS TILLMAN 31 TULSA WAGONER WASHITA 29 WOODS 26 WASHINGTON MARSHALL 13 MAJOR KINGFISHER 19 BEAVER TEXAS LOGAN CREEK LINCOLN OKFUSKEE McINTOSH CADDO 11 MCCLAIN GARVIN SEMINOLE POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL LE FLORE COAL 45 JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN Ag Budget Per Farm Below $5 $5-$7 $7-$9 $9-$14 $15-$22 $23-$39 $40 + Average Per District Capita Budget NE $9.13 NW $31.62 SE $14.81 SW $19.42

2015 POPULATION (Average = 50,797 Median = 22,004) District % of Total
WOODWARD 21,559 ADAIR 22,004 5,868 ALFALFA ATOKA 13,793 BECKHAM 23,768 BLAINE 9,833 BRYAN 44,884 CANADIAN 133,378 CARTER 48,689 48,447 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 14,997 CIMARRON 2,216 CLEVELAND 274,458 COMANCHE 124,648 COTTON 5,996 CRAIG 14,818 CUSTER 29,744 41,459 DELAWARE DEWEY 4,995 ELLIS 4,321 GARFIELD 63,569 GRADY 54,648 GRANT 4,523 GREER 6,070 2,788 HARMON HARPER 3,754 JACKSON 25,574 JEFFERSON 6,276 KAY 45,336 KIOWA 9,144 LATIMER 10,483 LOVE 9,870 MAYES 40,887 MURRAY 13,936 MUSKOGEE 69,699 NOBLE 11,554 10,539 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 776,864 OKMULGEE 39,187 OSAGE 47,887 OTTAWA 31,981 PAWNEE 16,436 PAYNE 80,850 PUSHMATAHA 11,183 ROGER MILLS 3,788 ROGERS 90,802 SEQUOYAH 41,153 STEPHENS 44,581 TILLMAN 7,515 TULSA 639,242 WAGONER 76,559 WASHITA 11,661 WOODS 9,304 WASHINGTON 52,021 MARSHALL 16,232 MAJOR 7.771 KINGFISHER 15,584 BEAVER 5,427 TEXAS 21,489 LOGAN 45,996 CREEK 70,892 LINCOLN 35,042 OKFUSKEE 12,181 McINTOSH 19,990 CADDO 29,343 MCCLAIN 38,066 GARVIN 27,755 25,548 SEMINOLE 71,875 POTTAWATOMIE 13,735 HUGHES PITTSBURG 44,610 HASKELL 12,845 LE FLORE 49,605 COAL 5,651 JOHNSTON 10,980 PONTOTOC 38,194 McCURTAIN 33,048 Thousands of People 2 - 5 6 - 10 45 -64 65 – 776 District % of Total NE % NW % SW % SE %

Projected FY16 4-H Budget Per Youth Between 5 and 18
(Average = $ Median = $26.38) WOODWARD ADAIR ALFALFA ATOKA BECKHAM BLAINE BRYAN CANADIAN CARTER CHEROKEE CHOCTAW CIMARRON CLEVELAND COMANCHE COTTON CRAIG CUSTER DELAWARE DEWEY ELLIS GARFIELD GRADY GRANT GREER HARMON HARPER JACKSON JEFFERSON KAY KIOWA LATIMER LOVE MAYES MURRAY NOBLE NOWATA OKLAHOMA OKMULGEE OSAGE OTTAWA PAWNEE PAYNE PUSHMATAHA ROGER MILLS ROGERS SEQUOYAH STEPHENS TILLMAN TULSA WAGONER WASHITA WOODS WASHINGTON MARSHALL MAJOR KINGFISHER BEAVER TEXAS LOGAN CREEK LINCOLN OKFUSKEE McINTOSH CADDO MCCLAIN GARVIN SEMINOLE POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL LE FLORE COAL JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN 4-H Budget Per Youth Between 5 and 18 Below $10 $10-$15 $15-$20 $20-$40 $40-$60 $60-$100 $100+ MUSKOGEE

Projected FY16 FCS Budget Per Adult (18 and Older)
(Average = $ Median = $4.21) WOODWARD ADAIR ALFALFA ATOKA BECKHAM BLAINE BRYAN CANADIAN CARTER CHEROKEE CHOCTAW CIMARRON CLEVELAND COMANCHE COTTON CRAIG CUSTER DELAWARE DEWEY ELLIS GARFIELD GRADY GRANT GREER HARMON HARPER JACKSON JEFFERSON KAY KIOWA LATIMER LOVE MAYES MURRAY MUSKOGEE NOBLE NOWATA OKLAHOMA OKMULGEE OSAGE OTTAWA PAWNEE PAYNE PUSHMATAHA ROGER MILLS ROGERS SEQUOYAH STEPHENS TILLMAN TULSA WAGONER WASHITA WOODS WASHINGTON MARSHALL MAJOR KINGFISHER BEAVER TEXAS LOGAN CREEK LINCOLN OKFUSKEE McINTOSH CADDO MCCLAIN GARVIN SEMINOLE POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL LE FLORE COAL JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN FCS Budget Per Adult (18 and older) Below $2.00 $2.00-$2.75 $2.75-$3.50 $3.50-$5.00 $5.00-$8.00 $8.00-$15.00 $15.00+

Estimated Total (OSU + County) Ag Budget Per Farm
(Average = $ Median = $78.59) WOODWARD 127 47 ADAIR 92 ALFALFA ATOKA BECKHAM 54 BLAINE 67 BRYAN 65 CANADIAN 79 CARTER 73 CHEROKEE CHOCTAW 128 CIMARRON 115 CLEVELAND 110 COMANCHE 101 COTTON 156 CRAIG 45 CUSTER 118 DELAWARE DEWEY ELLIS 85 GARFIELD 96 GRADY 69 GRANT GREER 114 175 HARMON HARPER 117 JACKSON 76 JEFFERSON 125 KAY KIOWA LATIMER 94 LOVE MAYES 43 MURRAY 132 MUSKOGEE 59 NOBLE 124 NOWATA OKLAHOMA 87 OKMULGEE 46 OSAGE 80 OTTAWA 63 PAWNEE 75 PAYNE 70 PUSHMATAHA 89 ROGER MILLS ROGERS 62 SEQUOYAH STEPHENS 77 TILLMAN 105 100 TULSA WAGONER 95 WASHITA WOODS 81 WASHINGTON 126 MARSHALL 198 MAJOR 130 KINGFISHER 97 BEAVER TEXAS LOGAN 48 CREEK 64 LINCOLN 49 OKFUSKEE 141 McINTOSH 107 CADDO MCCLAIN GARVIN 42 51 SEMINOLE POTTAWATOMIE 56 HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL 29 LE FLORE COAL 111 JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN 34 Ag Budget Per Farm Below $48 $48-$64 $65-$74 $75-$84 $85-$103 $104-$123 $124+ Average Budget District Per Farm NE $72.24 NW $93.27 SE $83.29 SW $90.91

Ag Budget Per Farm With Sales over $100,000
Projected FY16 Ag Portion of the County Budget Per Farm With Over $100,000 of Sale (Average = $1,105 Median = $745) WOODWARD ADAIR ALFALFA ATOKA BECKHAM BLAINE BRYAN CANADIAN CARTER CHEROKEE CHOCTAW CIMARRON CLEVELAND COMANCHE COTTON CRAIG CUSTER DELAWARE DEWEY ELLIS GARFIELD GRADY GRANT GREER HARMON HARPER JACKSON JEFFERSON KAY KIOWA LATIMER LOVE MAYES MURRAY MUSKOGEE NOBLE NOWATA OKLAHOMA OKMULGEE OSAGE OTTAWA PAWNEE PAYNE PUSHMATAHA ROGER MILLS ROGERS SEQUOYAH STEPHENS TILLMAN TULSA WAGONER WASHITA WOODS WASHINGTON MARSHALL MAJOR KINGFISHER BEAVER TEXAS LOGAN CREEK LINCOLN OKFUSKEE McINTOSH CADDO MCCLAIN GARVIN SEMINOLE POTTAWATOMIE HUGHES PITTSBURG HASKELL LE FLORE COAL JOHNSTON PONTOTOC McCURTAIN Ag Budget Per Farm With Sales over $100,000 Below $400 $400-$500 $500-$600 $600-$900 $900-$1,400 $1,400-$2,000 $2,000+

Realizing that it is only your initial reaction, do you favor a “House” or “Senate” Model?
House Model Senate Model

Some Budget Alternatives That Our $34 Million Budget Can Afford?

An 8% to 10% Salary Increase for Field Staff?

Why a Salary Increase? Choice #
# Because your Administrators are nice people # You are not being paid what you are worth # You will be asked to do more in the future # All of the above

Starting Salaries for B.S. Degrees in the Southern Region
Florida $40,000 Mississippi $38,000 Arkansas $36,000 Louisiana $36,000 Texas $36,000 Alabama $35,600 Kentucky $35,500 Tennessee $35,500 North Carolina $35,000 Georgia $34,500 Oklahoma $34,000 Virginia $33,000 South Carolina $32,500 Average $35,508

Starting Salaries for B.S. Degrees in the Southern Region
Florida $40,000 Mississippi $38,000 Arkansas $36,000 Louisiana $36,000 Texas $36,000 Alabama $35,600 Kentucky $35,500 Tennessee $35,500 North Carolina $35,000 Georgia $34,500 Oklahoma $34,000 Virginia $33,000 South Carolina $32,500 Average $35,508 11.7% 5.9%

Looking at Possible Alternatives That Our Budget Can Afford
Assumptions: 1) 8 to 10% salary increase

Assumptions: 1) 8 to 10% salary increase a) Cost in terms of positons is roughly i) 18 county

Assumptions: 1) 8 to 10% salary increase a) Cost in terms of positons is roughly i) 18 county ii) 14 area

Assumptions: 1) 8 to 10% salary increase a) Cost in terms of positons is roughly i) 18 county ii) 14 area iii) 10 faculty

Assumptions: 1) 8 to 10% salary increase a) Cost in terms of positons is roughly i) 18 county ii) 14 area iii) 10 faculty 2) Current deficit is $2.2 million

Area/District Specialist 9.5 28.6 47.6
Staffing Impacts of Alternative Budget Deficits Position Type $1,000,000 $3,000,000 $5,000,000 Faculty 6.5 19.5 32.5 Area/District Specialist 9.5 28.6 47.6 Count Educator 12.2 36.6 61.0 Campus Support Staff 18.2 54.5 90.9 County Support Staff 22.2 66.7 111.1

Salary Plus M&O Funding by Job Type
Staff Type Staffing Allocations 2015 Salary plus M&O OCES Paid Area/District Specialist 24.5 $105,000 County Paid Educator 51 $82,000 OCES Paid Educator 150 County Paid Paraprofessional 18.5 $45,000 OCES Paid Paraprofessional County Paid Secretaries 18 OCES Paid County/Area Secretaries 85 Campus Staff 95.53 $55,000 Faculty 37.88 $154,000 Admin. (Campus & District) 15.95 $200,000 # Positions with Co. Paid M&O 227 212 # of Area Spec. Paid M&O by Co.

Quick Look at 3 Field Staffing Plans With 2 Different Budget Deficit Levels to Remove

#1 -- 1.5 Educators per County (Current Plan)
Quick Look at 3 Field Staffing Plans With 2 Different Budget Deficit Levels to Remove # Educators per County (Current Plan)

# Educators per County (Current Plan) # Educator Per County

# Educators per County (Current Plan) # Educator Per County # Educator and .5 Paraprofessionals Per County

# Educators per County (Current Plan) # Educator Per County # Educator and .5 Paraprofessionals Per County # ????????????

# Educators per County (Current Plan) # Educator Per County # Educator and .5 Paraprofessionals Per County # ???????????? # ????????????

# Educators per County (Current Plan) # Educator Per County # Educator and .5 Paraprofessionals Per County # ???????????? # ???????????? #6 -- Not illustrated here, but many other plans can be analyzed with the spreadsheet used to consider the first three options.

Continue Current Plan -- 1.5 Educators
Staff Type Staffing Allocations to remove a $3 Million Deficit 2015 Option #2 OCES Paid Area/District Specialist 24.5 19 County Paid Educator 51 OCES Paid Educator 150 115.5 County Paid Paraprofessional 18.5 OCES Paid Paraprofessional County Paid Secretaries 18 OCES Paid County/Area Secretaries 85 82 Campus Staff 95.53 91.48 Faculty 37.88 33.9 Admin. (Campus & District) 15.95 14.7 # Positions with Co. Paid M&O 296.5 262 # of Area Spec. Paid M&O by Co.

to remove a $3 Million Deficit
1 Educator/County Staff Type Staffing Allocations to remove a $3 Million Deficit 2015 Option #3 OCES Paid Area/District Specialist 24.5 47 County Paid Educator 51 OCES Paid Educator 150 77 County Paid Paraprofessional 18.5 OCES Paid Paraprofessional County Paid Secretaries 18 OCES Paid County/Area Secretaries 85 82 Campus Staff 95.53 91.48 Faculty 37.88 33.95 Admin. (Campus & District) 15.95 14.7 # Positions with Co. Paid M&O 227 # of Area Spec. Paid M&O by Co.

1 Educator/.5 Paraprofessional
Staff Type Staffing Allocations to remove a $3 Million Deficit 2015 Option #4 OCES Paid Area/District Specialist 24.5 32 County Paid Educator 51 OCES Paid Educator 150 77 County Paid Paraprofessional 18.5 OCES Paid Paraprofessional 38.5 County Paid Secretaries 18 OCES Paid County/Area Secretaries 85 82 Campus Staff 95.53 91.48 Faculty 37.88 33.95 Admin. (Campus & District) 15.95 14.7 # Positions with Co. Paid M&O 227 212 # of Area Spec. Paid M&O by Co.

Continue Current Plan – 1.5 Educators
Staff Type Staffing Allocations to remove a $5.5 Million Deficit 2015 Option #2 OCES Paid Area/District Specialist 24.5 -3 County Paid Educator 51 OCES Paid Educator 150 115.5 County Paid Paraprofessional 18.5 OCES Paid Paraprofessional County Paid Secretaries 18 OCES Paid County/Area Secretaries 85 82 Campus Staff 95.53 91.48 Faculty 37.88 33.9 Admin. (Campus & District) 15.95 14.7 # Positions with Co. Paid M&O 296.5 262 # of Area Spec. Paid M&O by Co.

to remove a $5.5 Million Deficit
1 Educator/County Staff Type Staffing Allocations to remove a $5.5 Million Deficit 2015 Option #3 OCES Paid Area/District Specialist 24.5 24 County Paid Educator 51 OCES Paid Educator 150 77 County Paid Paraprofessional 18.5 OCES Paid Paraprofessional County Paid Secretaries 18 OCES Paid County/Area Secretaries 85 82 Campus Staff 95.53 91.48 Faculty 37.88 33.95 Admin. (Campus & District) 15.95 14.7 # Positions with Co. Paid M&O 227 # of Area Spec. Paid M&O by Co.

1 Educator/.5 Paraprofessional
Staff Type Staffing Allocations to remove a $5.5 Million Deficit 2015 Option #4 OCES Paid Area/District Specialist 24.5 9 County Paid Educator 51 OCES Paid Educator 150 77 County Paid Paraprofessional 18.5 OCES Paid Paraprofessional 38.5 County Paid Secretaries 18 OCES Paid County/Area Secretaries 85 82 Campus Staff 95.53 91.48 Faculty 37.88 33.95 Admin. (Campus & District) 15.95 14.7 # Positions with Co. Paid M&O 227 212 # of Area Spec. Paid M&O by Co.

KEY QUESTION #4 How fast should we complete the transition plan we develop?

Timeline Considerations

Downsizing by Attrition – Pros and Cons

Downsizing by Attrition – Pros and Cons Possible Attrition Rates

Downsizing by Attrition – Pros and Cons Possible Attrition Rates Natural  3%

Downsizing by Attrition – Pros and Cons Possible Attrition Rates Natural  3% Natural With 50% Replacement 1.5%

Downsizing by Attrition – Pros and Cons Possible Attrition Rates Natural  3% Natural With 50% Replacement 1.5% Normal  5%

Downsizing by Attrition – Pros and Cons Possible Attrition Rates Natural  3% Natural With 50% Replacement 1.5% Normal  5% Normal With 50% Replacement 2.5%

Downsizing by Attrition – Pros and Cons Possible Attrition Rates Natural  3% Natural With 50% Replacement 1.5% Normal  5% Normal With 50% Replacement 2.5% Incentivized (Buy Out) 8% to 12%

Downsizing by Attrition – Pros and Cons Possible Attrition Rates Natural  3% Natural With 50% Replacement 1.5% Normal  5% Normal With 50% Replacement 2.5% Incentivized (Buy Out) 8% to 12% Forced Attrition 12% to 100%

of Deficits and Budget Cutting Rates
Number of Years Required to Balance the Budget With Different Combinations of Deficits and Budget Cutting Rates Deficit Amount Annual Cut in Salary & Benefit Budget 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% $1 Million 3.3 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.7 $2 Million 6.4 2.3 1.4 $3 Million 9.8 4.9 2.5 2.1 1.8 $4 Million 13.2 6.7 4.5 3.4 2.8 $5 Million 16.7 8.4 5.7 4.3 2.9 $6 Million 20.3 10.3 6.9 5.2 4.1 3.5

Number of Years Required to Balance the Budget With Different Combinations of Deficits and Budget Cutting Rates (1 Year Options) Deficit Amount Annual Cut in Salary & Benefit Budget 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% $1 Million 3.3 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.8 0.7 $2 Million 6.4 2.3 1.4 $3 Million 9.8 4.9 2.5 2.1 1.8 $4 Million 13.2 6.7 4.5 3.4 2.8 $5 Million 16.7 8.4 5.7 4.3 2.9 $6 Million 20.3 10.3 6.9 5.2 4.1 3.5

Annual Cut in Salary & Benefit Budget
Amount of Reserves (in Millions) Needed to Avoid Negative Carryover With Different Combinations of Deficits and Budget Cutting Rates Deficit Amount Annual Cut in Salary & Benefit Budget 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% $1 Million $1.6 $0.8 $0.6 $0.4 $0.3 $2 Million $6.3 $3.2 $2.2 $1.3 $1.1 $3 Million $14.3 $7.2 $4.8 $3.7 $3.0 $2.5 $4 Million $25.7 $13.0 $8.7 $6.5 $5.3 $4.4 $5 Million $40.5 $20.4 $13.6 $10.3 $8.3 $6.9 $6 Million $58.9 $29.6 $19.8 $14.9 $12.0 $10.0

Annual Cut in Salary & Benefit Budget
Amount of Reserves (in Millions) Needed to Avoid Negative Carryover With Different Combinations of Deficits and Budget Cutting Rates Annual Cut in Salary & Benefit Budget Deficit Amount 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% $1 Million $1.6 $0.8 $0.6 $0.4 $0.3 $2 Million $6.3 $3.2 $2.2 $1.3 $1.1 $3 Million $14.3 $7.2 $4.8 $3.7 $3.0 $2.5 $4 Million $25.7 $13.0 $8.7 $6.5 $5.3 $4.4 $5 Million $40.5 $20.4 $13.6 $10.3 $8.3 $6.9 $6 Million $58.9 $29.6 $19.8 $14.9 $12.0 $10.0

Financial feasibility is only one consideration. Others include:
Financial feasibility is only one consideration. Others include: 1) morale 2) program continuity 3) retraining time 4) clientele considerations 5) uncertainty 6) and others

Should we complete the Transition Process in --
Less than 1 year 1 to 2 years 2 to 3 years 3 to 4 years take more than 4 years 8% 33% 45% 10% 4%

Perceived Drivers of Change In Extension

Primary Drivers 1) A reduced budget that may continue to decline
Perceived Drivers of Change In Extension Primary Drivers 1) A reduced budget that may continue to decline

Primary Drivers 1) A reduced budget that may continue to decline 2) An increasingly noncompetitive salary structure

Secondary Drivers 1) The use of electronic media to disseminate Extension program information

Secondary Drivers 1) The use of electronic media to disseminate Extension program information 2) Need for higher level expertise by Ag Educators

Secondary Drivers 1) The use of electronic media to disseminate Extension program information 2) Need for higher level expertise by Ag Educators 3) Apparent underutilization of volunteers in 4-H

Secondary Drivers 1) The use of electronic media to disseminate Extension program information 2) Need for higher level expertise by Ag Educators 3) Apparent underutilization of volunteers in 4-H 4) A need to be visible and present in urban areas

Secondary Drivers 1) The use of electronic media to disseminate Extension program information 2) Need for higher level expertise by Ag Educators 3) Apparent underutilization of volunteers in 4-H 4) A need to be visible and present in urban areas 5) Oklahoma has significant health and social issues

Secondary Drivers 1) The use of electronic media to disseminate Extension program information 2) Need for higher level expertise by Ag Educators 3) Apparent underutilization of volunteers in 4-H 4) A need to be visible and present in urban areas 5) Oklahoma has significant health and social issues 6) Diversity of agriculture and populations make it difficult to be all things to all people.

Questions? Dr. James Trapp Associate Director October 2016

Questions?

Questions? Dr. James Trapp Associate Director October 2016

PRESENTATIONS

Oklahoma Extension Today and Tomorrow

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Oklahoma Extension Today and Tomorrow"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Oklahoma Extension Today and Tomorrow

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Oklahoma Extension Today and Tomorrow"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback