1. Wes Brown

2. Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks RAID 0 No Protection! RAID 1 Limited Space RAID 0+1 Limited Protection Speed RAID 10 Best Protection Best Speed RAID 5 Limited Protection Most Capacity RAID 6 Better Protection Slow Space or Performance? Configuring Your Array Managing Disk Failures Stripe Size, Block Size, and IO Patterns Basics of SANs Shared Storage Capacity not speed This is a quick dive into your servers IO DNA. We will cover… Base System Makeup System Buses Peripheral Buses Disk Controllers, Host Bus Adapters, and Interfaces Disk Controller basics HBAs Interface speeds The Basics of Spinning Disks Physical Structure Track placement Disk Speeds Latencies Random vs. Sequential IO Disk Queuing Solid State Disks SSD vs. Hard Drive SSD form factor and performance SQL Server and The File System ACID and WAL Stable Media FUA File Access File System Configuration Align Partition 64KB Cluster Size SQL Server Files Data Files 8KB / 64KB Random IO Log Files 512 Byte / 8KB + Sequential IO Solid State Disks SSD vs. Hard Drive SSD form factor and performance

3. The modern server is made up of several buses or controllers that talk to each other and to the CPU. Front-side Bus Usually, memory only access Fastest bus on system Hypertransport/Quickpath replacing FSB I/O Controller/Bus Also known as the peripheral bus All onboard devices All expansion slots

4. Bus TypeSpeed MB/Sec PCI 32-bit/33 MHz133 PCI-X1066 PCI Express x1, 4, 8, 16250, 1000, 2000, 4000 PCI Express 2.0 x16, 328000,1600 PCI Express 3.0 x16 (2011~)32000 Always use the fastest bus possible for your disks. Some buses are shared (pci-x).

5. Drive caches 2MB to 64MB+ Adaptive Segmentation Pre-Fetch RAID Host Bus Adapters Read caching Write caching !WARNING! Hardened writes Pay now or pay later Writes take precedence over reads 16GB buffer pool vs. 256 MB IO cache, you do the math

6. Bus TypeSpeed MB/Sec ATA/133133 SATA/SAS 150, 300, 600150, 300, 600 SCSI U160, U320160, 320 Fibre Channel 1G, 2G, 4G, 8G106, 212, 425, 850 iSCSI 1Gbit, 10Gbit125, 1250 These are Maximum Speeds SCSI can have 15 drives per chain so 15 drives share 320MB/Sec SAS is compatible with SATA. There was no SAS 150. SAS is point to point can have 300MB/sec per drive or use expanders to group 16 drives on 4 SAS 300 ports (typical arrangement)

7. Six hard disk drives with cases opened showing platters and heads; 8, 5.25, 3.5, 2.5, 1.8, and 1 inch disk diameters are represented. AuthorPaul R. Potts

8. You are only as fast as your slowest or narrowest pipe, hard drives. To feed other parts of the system we have to add lots of drives to get the desired IO single server can consume. The problem isnt size is speed. TimeCirca 1981Today Improvemen t Capacity10MB1470MB147x HDD Seeks85ms/seek3.3ms/seek20x IO/Sec11.4 IO/Sec303 IO/Sec26x HDD Throughput5mbit/sec1000mbit/sec200x CPU Speed8088 4.77Mhz (.33 MIPS)Core i7 965(18322 MIPS)5521x

9. Head/Sectors/Cylinders Not a true physical representation! Data/Track Placement Outside tracks pack more data = more MB/Sec Inside tracks seek faster = more I/O Sec More platters dont = more speed! Current HDD only have one read/write channel Doesnt Apply to Solid State Disk!

10. Track is in Yellow, Sector is in Red and Cylinder is through the disks

11. Typical 73 GB SAS/SCSI Speeds Rotational Speed - 15,000 RPM Avg. Seek for random I/Os – Real world 5.5 ms read, 6.0ms write Theoretical 2.9 ms read, 3.3 write Transfer Rate – Sequential 65MB ~ 120MB/Sec Transfer Rate – Random 10MB ~ 30MB/Sec Cache can effect this block size effects this 4~64k Track to Track Seek for sequential I/Os– 0.5ms read, 0.7 ms write Rotational Latency - 2.0 ms

12. Seek Time The time required to move the read/write heads over the disk surface to the required track. The seek time is roughly proportional to the distance the heads must move. Rotational Latency The time taken, after the completion of the seek, for the disk platter to spin until the first sector addressed passes under the read/write heads. On average, the rotational latency is half of a full rotation. Transfer TimeThe time taken for the disk platter to spin until all the addressed sectors have passed under the heads. Spindle Speed(RPM)Average Latency (ms)Typical Current Applications 5,4005.6IDE Desktop/Laptop 7,2004.2Current Standard IDE/SATA 10,0003High end SATA Standard SAS/SCSI 15,0002Current Maximum SAS/SCSI

13. Maximum Random Seeks / sec 1000 / (seek time[ms] + latency[ms])= IOps 1000 / (2.9+2.0) = 204 Reads/Sec 1000 /(3.3+2.0) = 188 Writes/Sec Queuing effects latency!

14. Maximum Write Seeks per second = 188 Knee of Curve at 80% Configure for 140 I/Os per second per disk for random I/Os This is 75% of maximum capacity Keeps latency low!

15. Sequential I/O is much faster Seek time 5.5 ms 0.7 ms Same calculation yields 370 I/Os per sec or 277 I/Os per sec @ 75% > 300+ I/Os per sec is common for sequential As I/Os increase so does Latency Sequential disk throughput can be close to SSDs throughput.

16. No moving parts, IOs measured in Microseconds! So, random IO is 200x or better than HDD Reads faster than writes, generally As much as 4 to 1 depending on the manufacturer Wear differently than HDD Can loose capacity over time Can slow down due to wear leveling Several layers of error correction Expensive SAS 15k drive $2.00/GB SSD $8.00/GB Doesnt have to be a HDD form factor!

17. PerformanceHDDSSDImprovement Seek Times3.3ms/seek85μs/seek388x I/O/Sec30335000115x MB/Sec1002502.5x How Does A Hard Drive Stack Up to a Solid State Disk? Not all SSDs are created equal Intel x25-M priced at 750.00 for 160GB in a 2.5 SATA 3.0 form factor and the Fusion-io ioDrive Duo 640GB model priced at 15000.00 in a PCIe 8x single card. why not SLC? Budget wise this is squarely in the realm of possibility.

18. DriveGB Write MB/Sec Read MB /sec Reads /sec Writes /Sec seek WL/D $$/GB $/Read$/Write IoDrive Duo 6401GB1.4GB127K181K80μs5TB$15k$25.39$0.11$0.08 X25-M16070MB250MB35k3.3k85μs100GB$750$4.60$0.02$0.22 Imp.-4x-14x-5x-4x-55x~-10x-20x-5x 3x Mainstream SSD Compared to PCIe Drive

19. Requires two or more disks. No lost drive space due to striping. Fastest read and write performance. Offers no data protection. The more disks, the more risk.

20. Two disk only Write speed of one disk Read speed of two disk Capacity is equal to the size of one disk

21. Requires 4 or more drives Is a mirror of two raid zero stripes Can loose two drives and still function Only half the space is available Not the same as RAID 10

22. Best write and read performance Requires 4 or more drives Is a set of mirrors striped Can loose n/2 drives where in is the total number of drives in the array Only half the capacity is available

23. Considered best compromise Requires 3 or more drives Stripe across all drives with parity Can loose 1 drive and still function Capacity is n-1 where n is number of drives in array

24. Double raid 5 protection 4 or more disk Is a stripe with two parity drives Can loose two drives and still function Capacity is n-2 where n is number of drives in array

25. Raid 0 1 IOP read 1 IOP write No data protection Raid 1 1 IOP read 2 IOP write Both disk are written to both and both disk are read from Caveat depending on manufacturers implementation can be 2 IOP read or fastest seek Raid 0+1 1 IOP read 2 IOP write Raid 10 1 IOP read 2 IOP write Raid 5 1 IOP read 4 IOP write Both the target stripe and the parity stripe must be read and the parity calculated then both stripes must be written out Caveat reads can be as fast as n-1 disk Raid 6 1 IOP read 6 IOP write Both the target stripe and the two parity stripes must be read and the parity calculated then all three stripes must be written out Caveat read can be as fast as n-2 disk

26. Raid 0 = Data gone! More disk more risk! Raid 1 = Twice the reliability Raid 5 = Reliability at small scale more disk = higher risk! Raid 6 = Reliability at large scale more GB = more risk Raid 10 = Reliability at any scale susceptible to correlated disk failures Calculating failure rates is complicated! Rule of thumb, more than 8 drives in a RAID 5 could be disastrous Uncorrectable read rate on large drives 1TB is a real danger! Disks from the same batch suffer similar fate (correlated failures) Turn on torn page for 2000 and checksum for 2005/8! Restore Backups regularly. Its a recovery plan not a backup plan….

27. SQL Server data files 8k pages 64k extents 256k read ahead RAID cluster size should be set to 64k or 256k Start at 64k cluster size Move to 256k cluster size for better sequential throughput Know your IO patterns! Generally 256k fits 99% of your needs Separate IO types! Data files tend to be random reads/writes Log files have zero random reads/writes More than one log on a drive = random reads/writes! Better Than Putting Logs With Data Though Separate LUNs with no shared disk! Raid 1 or 10 for logs Heavy write load demands it Raid 5, 6 or 10 for data More than 10% writes you should start looking at raid 10 Understand writes incur reads!

28. Physical disk sectors 512,4096 Cant restore or attach larger sector size on a smaller sector size disk. 1024 can go on a 512 but not 512 on a 1024 Be aware of possible performance penalties It doesnt add up 10 drives at 80MB/sec != 800MB/sec Rule of thumb 15 MB/sec per drive RAID Array Configuration Stripe size and IO request size determine throughput Small stripes + large IO request = split IOs SQL Server works mostly in 8K and 64K blocks

29. Storage Area Network Essentially a specialized computer system Specialized network using Fibre Channel or Ethernet Great for redundancy or clustering Focused on storage consolidation not storage speed NAS is not a SAN! Internal Disk Configuration Disks are broken up into slices Slices are grouped into Logical Unit Numbers (LUNs) These are presented as volumes to your host Size for IO loads not disk space! Dont share your disks with other applications like Exchange You and your Exchange admin will both be very sad Watch for hot spots

30. ACID and WAL ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability) is what makes our database reliable. The ability to recover from a catastrophic failure is key to protecting your data. WAL (Write-Ahead Logging) is how ACID is achieved. Basically, the log record must be flushed to disk before the data file is modified. Stable Media Stable media isnt just the disk drive. A controller with a battery backed cache is also considered stable. FUA (Forced Unit Access) FILE_FLAG_WRITETHROUGH tells the underlying OS not to use write caching that isnt considered stable media. FILE_FLAG_NO_BUFFERING tells the OS not to buffer the file ether. At this point the only cache available will be the battery backed or other durable cached on the controller. File Access SQL Server uses asynchronous access for data and log files. SQL Server will try and gather writes to the data file into bigger blocks but the log is always written to sequentially. All of these rules apply to everything but tempdb. Since tempdb is recreated at restart every time recoverability isnt an issue.

31. Format data partitions to 64k cluster size for performance. SQL Server reads in 64k chunks if possible Sector alignment to prevent split I/Os MBR occupies the first 63 sectors leaving your partition starting on the 64 th Use diskpar (windows 2000/2003 pre sp1) Use diskpart (windows 2003 sp1 or greater) Windows 2008 aligns out of the box on 1MB Disk defrag will not fix this! Full partition format will not fix this!

32. Response Time = Service Time + Wait Time Forget Disk Queue Length More relevant 10 year ago than today Caches mask DQ, SSDs behave differently Focus on latency and waits sys.dm_io_virtual_file_stats Gives you time to read and write IOs Gives you amount of data written and read at the file level Great for finding SAN hot spots sys.dm_os_wait_stats Gives you what SQL Server is doing besides IO Only at a instance level

34. Understanding Storage Systems and SQL Server Wesley Brown wes@planetarydb.com Twitter @WesBrownSQL Blog http://www.sqlserverio.comhttp://www.sqlserverio.com http://www.wesworld.net/raidcalculator.html