1. Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Review, Revise, and Reset:
Institution-Set Standards
Mehmet "Dali" Ӧztürk, Ph.D.
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
March/April 2018

2. ACCJC Guide to Evaluating and Improving Institutions
What criteria and processes does the college use to determine its priorities and set minimum expectations (institution-set standards) for student achievement, including required expectations of performance for course completion, job placement rates, and licensure examination passage rates? (Federal Regulation)
To what extent does the college achieve its standards? (Federal Regulation)
How does the college use accreditation annual report data to assess performance against the institution-set standards?
If an institution does not meet its own standards, what plans are developed and implemented to enable it to reach these standards? (Federal Regulation)

3. Course Completion Rate (14b. 12a.)
Student Achievement Data Requested by ACCJC
District level
Course Completion Rate (14b. 12a.)
Student Retention Rate-Fall to Fall (15b.)
Student Degree Completion (16b. 13a.)
Student Transfer to 4-year Colleges/universities (17b. 15a.)
Student Certificate Completion (18b. 14a.)
Program level
Career Technical Education (CTE)
Licensure
Employment

4. Methods for Setting and Using the Standards
Reasonable
Appropriate
Realistic

5. Proposed Method for Setting the Standards
Review most current and historical performance (multi-year/longitudinal data disaggregated by ethnicity and other demographic characteristics as appropriate)
Generate multi-year averages for performance (5-8 years)
Determine performance indicators based on data analysis, institutional history and context (standards)

6. Proposed Method for Using the Standards
Proposed Method for Using the Standards
Develop a performance range and/or color coding (Trapp, 2013):
Range
=>5% Above Target-Excellent
+ or – 5% On Target-Good
=<5% Below Target-Needs Attention

7. Dissect new standard that requires Institutional-Set Standards
Proposed Steps for Reviewing/Revising and Updating Institutional-Set Standards
Dissect new standard that requires Institutional-Set Standards
Identify required areas
Determine appropriate metrics
Update/align with ACCJC definitions
Collect and analyze data
Update/reset minimum standards
Propose recommendations and bring to Senior Management for discussion
Follow participatory governance structure
Publish and disseminate (e.g., post online, e-news, etc.)

8. Need a process to set Stretch Goals
Manual for Institutional Self-Evaluation
Program Review
IEPI
ISS Process

9. Multi-Year District Average
Institution-set Standard Recommendations
Student Achievement Area
Multi-Year District Average
Recommendation*
Course Completion Rate (14b.)
67%
(Fall 2005 to Fall 2012)
55%
69%
68%
71%
72%
Student Retention Rate-Fall to Fall (15b.)
58%
(Fall > Fall 2006 to Fall > Fall 2013)
50%
65%
64%
63%
Student Degree Completion (16b.)
843
( to )
700
1,089
1,122
1,206
1,231
Student Transfer to 4-year Colleges/universities (17b.)
35%
( to )
30%
34%
(2007/2008
Cohort)
33%
(2008/2009
(2009/2010
(2010/2011
Student Certificate Completion (18b.)
409
300
756
668
877
497
*Approved by the COS Board of Trustees in February 2014

10. Proposed Standards

11. Percentage of 6-year overall
Proposed Standards
Aspirational
Minimum
543*1.31= *1.32= *1.35=733.05

12. Proposed Standards
March/April 2018

13. Follow participatory governance structure
Review & Discussion
Where/Who
(participatory governance group)
When
First
Second
Senior Management (SM)
February 15, 2018
April 5, 2018
District Governance Senate (DGS)
February 27, 2018
April 10, 2018
Academic Senate (AS)
February 28, 2018
April 25, 2018
Deans Council (DC)
March 7, 2018
May 2, 2018

14. Thank You!