1. Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting – UTTRAKHAND On 02.04.2009
Ministry of HRD
Government of India
MDM-PAB Meeting – UTTRAKHAND On

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I
Review of Implementation of MDMS in UTTRAKHAND (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Questions?
What is the level of unspent balances as on ?
How regular is the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains?
What is the level of lifting?
How about cooking cost? Was it disbursed to Districts? What is the level of its utilisation at school level?
How utilisation of food grains and cooking cost is synchronized?
How is the utilisation of foodgrains reconciled with the number of meals served?
…… contd
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

4. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Contd ….., Questions?
How much MME was utilized? Under what activities?
What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices?
Part –II
What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2007 to 2008?
How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data?
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Benchmarks
Desirable stock in hand : 10% (+ or - 5%)
Lifting of food grains as on : 85%
Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [ to ]: 73% (+ or – 10%)
Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is required to be lifted & distributed.
Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost should be synchronous.
State’s AWP&B should be in accordance with MHRD’s guidelines.
Data in the AWP&B should be authentic, reliable & based on the records.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. No. of Schools Covered (PY + UP.PY)
Only 04% of the P+UP Schools are not covered under MDM

7. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of children in Q1+Q2+Q3)
87% Covered
No. of children (In lakh)
95% Covered
71% Covered
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

8. Break-up of children not covered
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

9. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Working Days in Q1+Q2+Q3)
(100%)
No. of Working days
(78%)
(73%)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

10. PAB Approval Vs State Performance (No. of Meals in Q1+Q2+Q3)
Benchmark 73 %
100%
100%
73% meals to be served
68 % meals served
No. of Meal (in Crore)
PAB Approval 08-09
7.31 lakhs. Children X 203 Working days = Cr. Meals.
PAB(Q1+Q2+Q3)
11.2 lakhs. Children X 149 Working days = Cr. meals (100%)
State(Q1+Q2+Q3)
9.7 lakhs. Children X 160 Working days = Cr. meals (93%)

11. Analysis: Foodgrains Availability (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
100%
Foodgrains (in MTs)
Benchmark 83%
55%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

12. Food grains lifting Month-wise cumulative (Including USB*)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
Including unspent balance of 1052 MTs as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

13. Foodgrains Utilisation (Q1+Q2+Q3)
100%
Foodgrains (in MTs)
Benchmark 73%
(55+4)%
45%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

14. Cooking Cost Utilisation (1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008)
100%
Benchmark 73%
54%
46%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

15. Mismatch in Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost (District-wise)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

16. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Reconciliation in Utilisation of foodgrains vs. No of meals served (District-wise)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
MME Utilisation ( to )
100%
70%
100%
30%
55%
01%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

18. Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
100%
Benchmark 73%
56%
44%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

19. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Sheds)
100%
100%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Devices)
120%
100%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

21. Performance Score card – A Summary
Sl. No.
Component
Achievement
Benchmark 1.
Foodgrains Utilisation
45%
73% 2.
Cooking Cost Utilisation
46% 3.
MME Utilisation
70%
75% 4.
Kitchen Shed construction
100% 5.
Kitchen Devices procurement 6.
QPRs
3 nos.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

22. Observations of Monitoring Institute National Institute of Administrative Research, Mussoorie
Districts Covered: Tehri, Dehradun, Rudraparyag
The report states that MDM is implemented in all the Govt. primary schools
and in EGS centers.
In all the sample schools MDM is served regularly.
In most of the cases prescribed menu is not following in the preparation of the
food. Mostly menu is without vegetables.
The provision of Bhojan Mata has been employed for preparing MDM.
Participation of community/VEC panchayats in the MDM is very low.

23. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2009-10
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

24. Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY)
6% Decreased
7% Decreased
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

25. Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM
06% Decreased
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

26. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
4% Decreased
5% Decreased
6.90
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

27. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2008-09(UPPER PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
6% Decreased
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

28. Year As per DISE data As per MDM Sanctions
No. of School days No
Year
As per DISE data
As per MDM Sanctions 1
203
233 2
213
220 3 NA 4
228(State Claim)

29. PAB’s Recommendations (2009-10)

30. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Thank You
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India