Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Thoughts on (Efficient) Drilled Shaft Design

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Thoughts on (Efficient) Drilled Shaft Design"— Presentation transcript:

1 Thoughts on (Efficient) Drilled Shaft Design
Robert Thompson, P.E., D.GE Dan Brown and Associates, PC ALDOT Pre-Construction Conference May 7, 2015

2 Thoughts on Efficient Drilled Shaft Design
Side vs Base Resistance Point of Fixity – Lateral Analysis Slurry Effect / Construction Methods Over Conservative Design? Flexibility / VE Design

3 Side vs. Base Resistance
Common to neglect one due to belief that they are incompatible – to mobilize base we have to “fail” side resistance Mobilization of side and base is at different displacements. Can design for both based on common displacement. Possible to never mobilize base resistance in rock sockets

4 Base Resistance Only Common to neglect side resistance because: Concerns over sidewall quality (construction techniques) in soil, so just easier to neglect. Inspection requires certain criteria for base resistance in rock (e.g. no seams), so we chase good rock and create a socket that was not included in the design. Just the way we have always done it.

5 Properties for modeling soil and rock in LPILE and FBPier
Lateral Loading Properties for modeling soil and rock in LPILE and FBPier Failure to adjust p-y models to match reality Inexperienced users Shaft or Socket length for “Point of Moment Fixity” Not well defined in AASHTO Depth for transverse steel – maybe to shaft tip NOT for determining minimum shaft length

6 • Geotechnical Strength Limit State Overturning failure
Lateral Loading • Geotechnical Strength Limit State Overturning failure • Structural Strength Limit State Yield in flexure • Service Limit State Lateral Deformations

7 • Geotechnical Strength Limit State
Lateral Loading • Geotechnical Strength Limit State • Model shaft as linear elastic beam • Perform analyses to find minimum length for stable solution with (1/φ) x factored loads • Use φ = 0.67 for Strength I-V Load Cases • Use φ = 0.8 for Extreme Event Load Cases

8 • Structural Strength Limit State
Lateral Loading • Structural Strength Limit State • Compute maximum bending moment using factored loads • Service Limit State • Compute deflections using service loads, nonlinear EI for shaft

9 Properties for modeling rock in LPILE and FBPier
Lateral Loading Properties for modeling rock in LPILE and FBPier Failure to adjust p-y models Inexperienced users Socket length for “Point of Moment Fixity” Not well defined in AASHTO Depth for transverse steel – may be to shaft tip NOT for determining minimum shaft length

10 Construction Methods/Constructability
As designer, why do we need to consider potential construction methods to be used? Can it be built? Reinforcement congestion = problems with concrete placement Are we introducing potential sources of problems? Side wall roughness, especially in soft rocks (e.g. shale) Slurry “filter cake” - reduces side resistance? Polymer slurry – increase side resistance? Can the contractor achieve a clean bottom Inspection requirements delaying concrete placement

11 Slurry Effect / Construction Methods
Wet Method - Starter Casing (“Can”)

12 Slurry Effect / Construction Methods
Casing in Starter Hole

13 Slurry Effect / Construction Methods
Wet + Casing

14 What Can Go Wrong? Voids Around Casing

15 Thoughts on Efficient Drilled Shaft Design

16 Over designed or Under designed?
Not OVER designed but UNDER designed Not spending enough time on the design Maybe more conservative (much larger than needed), not OVER designed

17 Maybe NOT Conservative at all
Over Conservative? Maybe NOT Conservative at all From a design perspective, yes, but…. Increase risk exposure during construction Requires larger tools/equipment More excavation, more chances for error Inexperienced contractor Wrong means/methods Etc.

18 Flexibility / VE Design
Difficult to be flexible with traditional Design-Bid-Build Value Engineered (VE) Designs Offers potential for flexibility, potential for cost savings Owner/designer need to be open to suggestions Review needs to be thorough but streamlined Sort out “selling” versus “ a better solution” Consider pre-bid Alternate Technical Concept (ATC) Contractor submits confidential pre-bid ATC for review If approved, can bid ATC or base bid Adopt Design-Build project delivery

19 What Else?


Download ppt "Thoughts on (Efficient) Drilled Shaft Design"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google