1. Assessing Pain Charts When Testing Pain Tolerance
Mikah Jones
Rockdale Magnet School for Science and Technology

2. Introduction
Many hospitals use pain charts but there isn’t a pain chart(s) out there that is the best to use or more widely used.
Pain tolerance is associated with pain. Every one individual has a different pain tolerance than another. Race and gender are factors that can play an important role in pain tolernace.

3. Rationale
If hospitals are using just any pain chart, then that pain chart might not actually be helping the patients there.
It would be helpful to the patient and doctor to have a pain chart that is effective and easy to use and can be used on any type of pain

4. Purpose
The purpose of this project is to see which pain chart is the easiest to use.
Another purpose of this project is to show the difference in pain tolerance in gender and race groups.

5. 4 Pain Charts Being Used

6. Background
In a study (Ferreira-Valente, Ribeiro, Jensen. February 2011.), it tested 4 Pain charts on how well it can measure pain intensity.
4 Pain Charts:
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)
Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R)
The participants did 4 20-second trials of the Cold Pressor Test(CPR). The temperatures for the cold water were 1, 3, 5, and 7, degrees Celsius.
Results showed that the Numerical Rating Scale was the most responsive, and was able to detect gender pain intensity differences.

7. In another study found (Kenneth, Woodrow, Friedman, Sieglaub, Coleen
In another study found (Kenneth, Woodrow, Friedman, Sieglaub, Coleen. 1972) they tested the pain tolerance between different age, races, and genders.
Results showed 3 things:
1. Pain Tolerance decreases with age
2. Men tolerate more pain then women
3. Whites tolerate more pain than Asians.

8. Hypotheses
Main hypothesis: the Numerical Rating Scale will be the the easiest to use compared to the other pain charts being used.
Sub Hypothesis: A. Females will experience a greater pain tolerance than males
Sub Hypothesis: B. Whites will experience a higher pain tolerance than race groups

9. Experimental Design Diagram
Manowski Pain Scale
Numerical Rating Scale
Pain Coping Chart
Faces Pain Scale- Revised
Male
Caucasian 5
African- American
Hispanic/Latino
Asian
Female

10. Procedures Data is collected and analyzed Consent forms are given out
Consent forms are returned and start the Cold Pressor Test
Container is filled with cold water
Data is collected and analyzed
Participants take their hand out and use pain chart
Participants put their hands in the water for 1 minute

11. Data Analysis 38 Participants were used overall 19 Males, 19 Females
10 Blacks, 10 Whites, 9 Asians, 9 Hispanics

12. Ease of Use Average Pain Score Chart Type Average Ease of Use MPS
1.5263
NRS
1.3158
PCC
1.5
FPSR
1.605

13. Race Vs. Pain Score Gender Vs. Pain Score Gender Average Pain Score
Male 4
Female

14. Conclusions
The Numerical Rating Scale was found to be the easiest pain chart to use. The main hypothesis was supported
Sub hypothesis A and B were both rejected
Overall all pain charts were found easy to use
The use of the pain coping chart would not be used in other types of pain since it has a higher average pain score

15. Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Scott Bolen for helping me with my project and answering any questions that I had along the way.
I would also like to thank the volunteers for being apart of my project.

16. Literature Cited
Woodrow, K., Friedman, G., Slegelaub, A., Collen, M. (November). Pain Tolerance: Differences According to Age, Sex and Race. Retrieved from short
Ferreira-Valente,M., Ribeiro,J., Jensen. M. February Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Retrieved from (11) /abstract

17. My Accomplishments

18. smyrna presbyterian Christmas Walk

19. Soccer Team Manager

20. Assessing Pain Charts When Testing Pain Tolerance
Any Questions?
Assessing Pain Charts When Testing Pain Tolerance