Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Paul Palmer, University of Leeds

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Paul Palmer, University of Leeds"— Presentation transcript:

1 Paul Palmer, University of Leeds
What can we learn about the Earth system using space-based observations of tropospheric chemical composition? Transcends many of nerc centers of excellences: DARC, CASIX, CTCD, NCAS Paul Palmer, University of Leeds

2 Observed rise in ozone background at northern midlatitudes
Ozone exceedances of 90 ppbv, summer 2003 (#days) Observed rise in ozone background at northern midlatitudes 60 Model values for preindustrial ozone } European mountain-top observations [Marenco et al., 1994] 50 0-1; 1-5; 5-10; >10 40 30 20 10 O3 penetrates plant foliage through the stomates into the cell walls, and subsequently decomposes to oxygen-containing molecules (e.g., H2O2), which damage plant cells. Elevated O3 concentrations lead to leaf necrosis and reduced agricultural yields [Ashmore, 2005]. 1870 1890 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990 Correlation of high ozone with temperature is driven by: 1) Stagnation, 2) Biogenic hydrocarbon emissions, 3) Chemistry

3 Tropospheric O3 is an important climate forcing agent
NO HO2 OH NO2 O3 hv HC+OH  HCHO + products NOx, HC, CO Level of Scientific Understanding Natural VOC emissions (50% isoprene) ~ CH4 emissions. IPCC, 2001

4 Bottom-up Isoprene emissions, July 1996
E = A ∏iγi Emissions (x,y,t); fixed base emissions(x,y); sensitivity parameters(t) Guenther et al, JGR, 1995 GEIA EPA BEIS2 2.6 Tg C Pierce et al, JGR, 1998 7.1 Tg C Guenther et al, ACP, 2006 MEGAN 3.6 Tg C [1012 atom C cm-2 s-1]

5 Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) & the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI)
Launched in 2004 GOME (European), OMI (Finnish/USA) are nadir SBUV instruments Ground pixel (nadir): 320 x 40 km2 (GOME), 13 x 24 km2 (OMI) 10.30 desc (GOME), asc (OMI) cross-equator time GOME: 3 viewing angles  global coverage within 3 days OMI: 60 across-track pixels  daily global coverage O3, NO2, BrO, OClO, SO2, HCHO, H2O, cloud properties

6 GOME HCHO columns July 2001 Biogenic emissions Biomass burning
Data: c/o Chance et al [1016 molec cm-2] 1 2 0.5 1.5 2.5 * Columns fitted: nm * Fitting uncertainty < continental signals

7 May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 GOME HCHO column [1016 molec cm-2] 1 2 0.5 1.5 2.5 Palmer et al, JGR, 2006.

8 Relating HCHO Columns to VOC Emissions
hours OH h, OH VOC Net kHCHO EVOC = (kVOCYVOCHCHO) HCHO ___________ Local linear relationship between HCHO and E VOC source Distance downwind WHCHO Isoprene a-pinene propane 100 km Three/four prong attack: Chemistry; Emissions: magnitude and controls; Transport EVOC: HCHO from GEOS-CHEM CTM and MEGAN isoprene emission model Palmer et al, JGR, 2003.

9 Seasonal Variation of Y2001 Isoprene Emissions
MEGAN GOME MEGAN GOME May Jun Aug Sep Jul 3.5 7 1012 atom C cm-2s-1 Good accord for seasonal variation, regional distribution of emissions (differences in hot spot locations – implications for O3 prod/loss). Other biogenic VOCs play a small role in GOME interpretation Palmer et al, JGR, 2006.

10 GOME Isoprene Emissions: 1996-2001
May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 [1012 molecules cm-2s-1] 5 10 Relatively inactive Palmer et al, JGR, 2006.

11 Isoprene flux [1012 C cm-2 s-1]
Sparse ground-truthing of GOME HCHO columns and derived isoprene flux estimates Isoprene flux [1012 C cm-2 s-1] Julian Day, 2001 MEGAN Obs GOME May Jun July Aug Sep Seasonal Variation: Comparison with eddy correlation isoprene flux measurements (B. Lamb) is encouraging Atlanta, GA PROPHET Forest Site, MI Atlanta, GA To evaluate the GOME interannual variability over the southeastern United States we used isoprene concentration data from four EPA Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Sites (PAMS, located around Atlanta Georgia. Three of these sites are classed as surburban and one is considered rural. Instantaneous concentration measurements are taken every three hours using an automated GC with flame ionization detection. The uncertainty of these individual measurements is 30\% (Susan Zimmer-Dauphinee, EPA, personal communication, 2004). Instruments are calibrated daily using an isoprene standard. Measurements that do not agree with the standard to within a 30\% accuracy are discarded. As with the HCHO columns, there is a large degree of interannual variability in the observed seasonal cycle on the continental scale (not shown). \callout{Figure \ref{fig:pamsga}} shows that GOME HCHO column data captures 58\% of the temporal variability of the monthly mean isoprene concentrations at all Atlanta sites, after removing one anomalous measurement (880~ppbC, July 1996) and two outliers (June 1998 and August 1999). % The value for the intercept (0.2$\times$10$^{16}$molec~cm$^{-2}$) in Figure \ref{fig:pamsga}, corresponding to the HCHO column with no contribution from isoprene, is half the background HCHO column that is expected from from CH$_4$ oxidation. The two monthly mean outliers originate from the rural site that is sometimes influenced by local biogenic emissions from the Kudzu vine, a known strong emitter of isoprene (Susan Zimmer-Dauphinee, EPA, personal communication, 2004). The reason why these local biogenic emissions significantly influence only a few months is unknown. By comparing mean summertime values (June$-$August) we effectively test the ability of GOME to capture observed interannual variability in isoprene concentration. GOME summertime columns between 1996$-$2001 capture 92\% of the observed interannual variability. GOME HCHO [1016 molec cm-2] Interannual Variation: Correlate with EPA isoprene surface concentration data. Outliers due to local emissions. PAMS Isoprene, 10-12LT [ppbC]

12 Surface temperature explains 80% of GOME-observed variation in HCHO
NCEP Surface Temperature [K] GOME HCHO Slant Column [1016 molec cm-2] G98 fitted to GOME data G98 Modeled curves Palmer et al, JGR, 2006. Time to revise model parameterizations of isoprene emissions?

13 Tropical ecosystems represent 75% of biogenic NMVOC emissions
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 What controls the variability of NMVOC emissions in tropical ecosystems? Kesselmeier, et al, 2002 Importance of VOC emissions in C budget? GOME HCHO column, July

14 Challenges: Cloud cover, biomass burning, and lack of fundamental understanding of NMVOC emissions…
TES 6km, 11/04 OMI, 24/9-19/10, 2004 13x24 km2 O3 Improved cloud-clearing algorithms and better spatial resolution data help. CO emission rate (C) (µg g-1 h-1) PAR (µmol m-2 s-1) assimilation (C) (mg g-1 h -1) 1 2 3 4 5 6 limonene myrcene b-pinene a-pinene sabinene 500 1000 1500 00:00 06:00 12:00 18:00 local time [hh:mm] 10 20 30 40 temperature [°C] G93 for isop. [sum of monoterpenes] transpiration (mmol m-2 s-1) monoterpene emission of Apeiba tibourbou A more integrated approach to understanding controls of NMVOCs, e.g., surface data, lab data, MODIS Firecount O3-CO-NO2-HCHO-firecount correlations import to utilize when looking at the tropics TES data c/o Bowman, JPL

15 Some aerosol-climate effects
SEVERI AOD CCN Primary and secondary aerosol sources: biomass burning, biogenic, desert dust Internally or externally mixed? visibility deposition Size of desert dust and biogenic aerosol Fe fertilization South America Africa D Z N P Ocean Ecosystem Africa

16 OP3 and OP3-APPRAISE Figure c/o: Franz X. Meizner (MPI)

17 Compiled from UK ozone network data
“Expect harmful levels of ozone and PM2.5 over the next couple of days; please keep small children and animals inside. Transatlantic pollution represents 20% of today’s UK surface ozone.” 2010 “Normal” airmass flow Stagnant airmass flow 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 27-Jul 29-Jul 31-Jul 2-Aug 4-Aug 6-Aug 8-Aug 10-Aug 12-Aug 14-Aug 16-Aug 18-Aug 20-Aug 22-Aug 24-Aug 26-Aug 28-Aug 30-Aug 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Temperature (C) Isoprene (ppt) Estimated up to 700 extra deaths attributable to air pollution (O3 and PM10) in UK during this period O3 > 100 ppb on 6 consecutive days 2pm, 6th Aug, 2003 Compiled from UK ozone network data Isoprene is normally 2-50 ppt No temperature dependence given!!!! Same latitude as hudson bay!! Isoprene c/o Ally Lewis

18 Resolution of new satellite data allows study UK AQ from space
GOME 1x1o Aug 1997 SCIA 0.4x0.4o, Aug 2004 NAEI NOX emissions as NO2, 2002 OMI 0.1ox0.1o, Jul 2004 GOME and SCIA NO2 c/o R. Martin; OMI (unofficial) NO2 c/o T. Kurosu Cloud cover [%], ISCCP August 83-04 30 100 70 Length of day [hours] Day of Year Edinburgh, 56N Denver, 40N Transcends many of nerc centers of excellences: DARC, CASIX, CTCD, NCAS Challenges...

19 The increasing role of BVOCs: constraints from OMI HCHO?
1016 [molec cm-2] OMI HCHO 2 <0.3 Stewart et al, 2003 Isoprene Monoterpenes BVOC fluxes for a “hot, sunny” day Data c/o T. Kurosu NO + RO2  NO2 + RO, Aug 2003 Isoprene HCHO No temperature dependence on isoprene emission….spruce plantation on the borders… Tropospheric O3 production results from NO + RO2  NO2 + RO The influence of different VOCs on this step can be calculated Much higher total rate of NO  NO2 conversion during the heatwave period (NB – the graphs have different scales) Isoprene contributes substantially to O3 production Given the short lifetime of isoprene, it must have been generated and reacted locally BOE: 0.5-1 ppb isoprene = 1-5x1012 molec cm-2 s-1 (cf. SE USA 5-7x1012 molec cm-2 s-1) NO2 production ppb h-1 c/o Jenny Stanton, University of Leeds

20 Space-based aerosol optical properties can help map emissions of particulate matter
MISR AOT can help estimate total PM2.5: MISRSurface PM2.5 = ModelSurface [PM2.5] x MISR AOT Model AOT 2003 roadside (primary) PM10 Unclear what PM characteristics affect health Secondary PM is formed from: Oxidation of organic compounds Oxidation of SO2 Difficult to estimate offline – need models and data Liu et al, 2004

21 Current Development in Modelling UK AQ
UK currently using MODELS 3 (MM5 + CMAQ) for AQ 1) UM mesoscale CTM UKMO Unified Model 2) UKCA gas-aerosol chemistry scheme AQ-climate links AQ Model Chem-Clim Model Global vs urban chemistry? Subgrid scale processes? Similar equations for data assimilation and inverse modelling J(x) = ½(yo – H(x))T(E+F)-1(yo-H(x)) +½(x-xb)TB-1(x-xb) Multi-species analyses – inter-species error covariance? Radiance versus retrieved products? Limit of linearization of non-linear oxidant chemistry?


Download ppt "Paul Palmer, University of Leeds"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google