Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Great Debates in Hematology

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Great Debates in Hematology"— Presentation transcript:

1 Great Debates in Hematology
New York City – April 2014 Switch therapy for a CML patient at 3 months because of failure to achieve an Early Molecular Response? Not so fast. David Steensma, MD FACP Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School Adult Leukemia Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Hematological Oncology Service, Brigham & Women’s Hospital

2 Disclosures Data monitoring committee: Amgen, Novartis Scientific advisory board or consulting: Genoptix, Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Incyte Stock equity: Ariad Off-label / experimental use will be discussed

3 But if your patient doesn’t get there… is the sky falling?
It is clear that achieving an early molecular response (<10% BCR-ABLIS) in chronic-phase CML with TKI therapy is a good thing. But if your patient doesn’t get there… is the sky falling?

4 3 month landmark matters…
Importance of 1 log reduction in transcript by 3 months first established in subset analysis of IRIS trial Better OS, EFS, and PFS also seen in study by Marin et al of 282 pts with CP-CML CML IV study from Germany (n=1303 with CP-CML on imatinib) showed 5 year OS of 87% vs 95% and PFS of 87% vs 92% for not meeting vs meeting 3 month 10% landmark Landmark analyses from DASISION and ENESTnd showed same applies to second gen TKI in CP-CML Quintas-Cardama A et al Blood 2009; 113: Marin D et al JCO 2012; 30: Hanfstein B et al Leukemia 2012; 26: Saglio G et al Blood 2012 [abstract 1675] Saglio G et al JCO 2013 (abstract 7054) Jain P et al Blood 2013; 121:

5 Eight-year probability of overall survival (OS) and current complete cytogenetic response survival (c-CCyRS) in the whole population and with patients stratified by risk group defined by BCR-ABL1 transcript level at 3 months. Marin D et al. JCO 2012;30:

6 6 month time point was critical
But even patients who do not achieve a 3 month early molecular response <10% can do well… if they get there by 6 months 6 month time point was critical 361 patients with CP-CML on imatinib (320 with all data) reviewed at Princess Margaret Hosp. in Toronto Kim D et al Am J Hematol 2014 ePub Mar 12

7 Slow and steady… Kim D et al Am J Hematol 2014 ePub Mar 12

8 Does changing drugs at 3 months actually help?
210 CML-CP patients in 23 Australasian centers All started on imatinib 600 mg Series of time dependent MR targets (BCR-ABL IS): ≤10% at 3 months ≤1% at 6 months ≤0.1% at 12 months If patients did not meet targets, either escalated to imatinib 800 mg QD or switched to nilotinib 400 mg BID No difference in blast crisis between cohorts; small difference in proportion of pts achieving deep MR

9 NCCN guidelines have too many ‘ors’ to be helpful…
Panel achieved consensus about switching from imatinib at 3 months No consensus about patients started on second generation TKIs

10 What to do instead of switching drugs
Step 1: Assess adherence Which is the most important cell type in determining relapse/progression of CML?

11 What to do instead of switching drugs
Step 1: Assess adherence Step 2: Check for drug or food interactions

12 A surprising number of foods and drugs interact with the 3 first line TKIs: absorption, metabolism
Imatinib is metabolized mainly by CYP3A4; CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP3A5 have a minor role; it is a substrate of hOCT1, Pgp, and BCRP Dasatinib is metabolized by CYP3A4 is a substrate of BCRP and Pgp Nilotinib is metabolized by CYP3A4 and is a substrate of BCRP All 3 are highly protein bound Haouala A et al Blood 2011; 117:e75-e87

13 What to do instead of switching drugs
Step 1: Assess adherence Step 2: Check for drug interactions Step 3: Consider ABL kinase mutation assay

14 ABL kinase mutation analysis aids in 2nd (or 3rd or 4th) line drug selection

15 So, if your patient doesn’t meet criteria for EMR at 3 months…

16

17 DFCI Adult Leukemia Clinical Program:
Richard Stone MD Daniel Deangelo MD PhD Martha Wadleigh MD Gregory (Goyo) Abel MD MPH R. Coleman Lindsley MD PhD And other research collaborators Sarah Cahill PA-C Katherine Edmonds NP Adriana Penicaud PA-C Susan Buchanan PA-C Ilene Galinsky NP & Clinical Research Coordinators Regulatory Team Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Thank you!


Download ppt "Great Debates in Hematology"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google