1. Procedural Fairness: A Key to Building Public Support for Courts
Judge Kevin Burke
Conference of State Court Administrators
December 2, 2011 1

2. What people want is an America as good as its promise. - Barbara Jordan
What people want are courts that are as good as their promise—
courts that are fair, efficient, and effective 2

3. Topics What the public thinks about courts and judges
An overview of procedural fairness
Can it succeed with a large group of judges? 3

4. In your opinion, to what extent to you think a judge’s ruling is influenced by his or her personal political views—to a great extent, moderate extent, small extent, or not at all?
Great extent
33%
Moderate extent
42%
Source: Princeton Survey Research Associates International Poll for the Annenberg Public Policy Center

5. In general, to what extent do you think a desire to be promoted to the next higher court would affect a judge’s ability to be fair and impartial when deciding a case—to a great extent, moderate extent, small extent, or not at all?
Great extent
35%
Moderate extent
40%
Source: Princeton Survey Research Associates International Poll for the Annenberg Public Policy Center

6. THE NATION IS DIVIDED ON HOW TO INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION
70% of Republicans say the Constitution should be based on its understanding of the Constitution as originally written
65% of Democrats believe that judges should base rulings on what the Constitution means today

7. Caldeira And McGuire argue that public knowledge of courts is more nuanced and complicated than typically thought
Citizens tend to know about court decisions of local interest
Citizens tend to know about court decisions that directly affect them
Highly salient controversies often penetrate the consciousness of the American people
Source: Gibson & Caldeira, Knowing About Courts

8. There is a lack of trust in our public institutions which although not focused specifically on courts is potentially dangerous

9. Why fairness is hard for us to define.
Outcome favorability – Did I win?
Outcome fairness – Did I get what I deserve?
Procedural fairness – Was my case handled through fair procedures?
11/14/2018 9

10. Why should you be interested? Procedural fairness works.
It encourages decision acceptance.
It leads to positive views about the legal system.
A system-wide commitment to a litigant’s bill of rights may be the best way to enhance public trust in the courts

11. Maybe we’ve got something here . . .
Study reported in says perceived fairness triggers brain reactions similar to eating chocolate or seeing a pretty face 11

12. Justice Research in Academia
Litigants have a powerful need to express themselves vocally during the court’s proceedings
Body language influences how litigants perceive the judge and the judge’s decision
Unlike the public, judges focus on the fairness of case outcomes instead of the process
Case volume of courts is a management challenge for judges, not an excuse for de-emphasizing procedural fairness
Perceptions of procedural fairness may differ among minority and majority populations

13. Lawyers vs. the Public: Predictors of Confidence
Source: 2005 California survey 13

14. Why should Court Leaders care?
Fact 1: You’re not getting more resources anytime soon.
Fact 2: Enhanced procedural fairness has been shown to increase compliance with court orders, which reduces caseload
Fact 3: In case you have not noticed, there are people that want to cut the budget further.

15. Black Robe Disease
It is fatal. There is no known cure. If you don’t think you can get it, you are practicing unsafe judging. Black robe disease will most likely affect your entire court culture. 15

16. The Court Litigant Bill of Rights
100% of the time you have a right
to be listened to
to be treated with respect
to understand why the decision was made

17. What data do we need in order to measure whether or not we are achieving fairness?

18. “After you confess, can you fill out this survey to help us improve our interrogation methods?”

19. CourTools

20. Are the Courts as good as they can be?
Is 99.9% right good enough for us to claim we are a quality court?

21. Training How well do I prepare, monitor, and correct my concentration so that I may stay focused on what a speaker is saying? How well do I build a complete and accurate understanding of the speaker’s message? Do I abide by the golden rule of listening: listen to others as I would like to be listened to?

22. Summing Up This stuff works with the public.
We aren’t naturally attuned to the way court participants view us.
We face a time of budgetary limits, but application of these concepts can help us to improve perceptions of our performance even in times like these.
Judges can act on these things on their own.
Work on listening skills
Judges can videotape themselves in court and then review the tapes by themselves or with the help of others.

23. A Call to Action We need a few states to band together
We can provide training and materials to new judges – if we know who they are
We need a commitment to data collection
We need COSCA’s leadership commitment to enhance procedural fairness in our courts