1. Final (?) line_0 configuration (follows steering group consideration 5/5/2004)
Line Zero meeting, Nov

2. Planning for Developments
Line Zero meeting, Nov

3. Line Zero Test Priorities EMC Cable and Leaks into LCMs
(A) EMC faults in interfloor links:
OTDR monitoring from shore
& local attenuation monitoring
(B) Leaks into LCM cylinders
Current draw & Phase shore station)
Local leak detection
ASSUMPTION:
2 STAGE DEPLOYMENT STRATEGY
PROPOSED BY JEAN ROUX: OK
Line Zero meeting, Nov

4. Line-Zero Optical+ Environmental Measurements
25 Storeys : all mechanical elements final design
All storeys consist of spheres weighted with old gel
2 storeys equipped with autonomous
PC data acquisition systems
from 2002 mechanical line test
RS232 R/O, Batteries in LCM container
Optical Loop 1: fibres linked in each storey and looped back on top to allow attenuation, OTDR testing from shore down DAQ Tx, Rx channels.
Optical Loops 2.1, 2.2, 2.3:
fibres linked in each storey and looped back on top to allow attenuation, testing using local optical power meter + Tinytag
(battery, local memory): data read using RS32 using McCartney OM connector in LCM flange
Line Zero meeting, Nov

5. Line-Zero: Electrical/Leak Monitoring
25 Storeys : all mechanical elements final design
All storeys consist of spheres weighted with old gel
EMC conductors linked in each storey and looped back on top to allow capacitative current monitoring via power conductors from junction box. MACC sensors with DSP readout on shore.
Local data loggers (“Tiny-tag” in OM spheres) to monitor leak
Level in neighbouring LCM cylinder; readout via RS232 using McCartney OM connector in LCM flange
1 Tinytag in top LCM container monitoring electrical continuity
readout via RS232 using McCartney OM connector in LCM flange
  Piezo-sensors in spare laser-beacon container. (Erlangen Request)
Line Zero meeting, Nov

6. Genova Autonomous DAQs
Equipped with SAFT, 130 Ah Lithium batteries
in LCM container
(OK for ~ 70 hours of continuous operation.)
Switch on the system at the moment of 1st deployment;
Download data at the moment of the recovery after 24 hours;
Switch off the system to save power;
Switch on again at the moment of the 2nd deployment
 batteries exhausted.
Line Zero meeting, Nov

7. Suggestion for power test setup
Transparency on data logging by Erik Heijne
U (TGPR-0704 *)
T,H (TGP-1500 *)
Logging of voltage temperature humidity
3 times/h for 6mnth
500V~ JB
LINE 0 *)
500V~
Line Zero meeting, Nov

8. Conductors and Optical Fibres in the EMC
Line Zero meeting, Nov

9. Two fibre-optic test systems:
OPM
Two fibre-optic test systems:
3 Local optical power meters
Combination of OPM and voltage-sensing Tinytag
(synchronization a problem?)
each OPM Uses 2 fibres in 1 of the 3 tubes
(2) Remote optical power meter /OTDR
DAQ Tx, Rx fibres from JB and IL
spliced directly to fibres in EMC cable
uses 4 or 5 fibres in each of the 3 tubes
(1 fibre in EMC not tested)
2 fibre coils in SPM case,
CLK1, CLK2 not looped back in SPM case
(might affect CK needed for MILOM etc)
Tube 1
Tube 2
Tube 3 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
OPM
m fibre to distinguish from IL
DAQ2
DAQ1
OPM
Line Zero meeting, Nov
OTDR
OPM

10. Four Electrical leak Test systems:
(1) Tinytags logging ingress sensors
(2) Remote monitoring of capacitive current
draw using MACC current sensor readout
into DSP
(3) Two wire conductive probes read out using
DVM following phase (1) of line zero deployment
placed at several levels in each LCM container
Read through LCM OM connectors
(4) Wristwatches placed at several levels
in each LCM container 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Killed in steering group meeting 5/11/04
Killed in steering group meeting 5/11/04
40km
COND 2
MACC
Pilot card
DSP PC
380V AC
COND 1
Line Zero meeting, Nov

11. Have become three electrical test systems:TT
Have become three electrical test systems:
(1) Tinytags logging ingress sensors
(2) Remote monitoring of capacitive current
draw using MACC current sensor readout
into DSP
(3) Two conductors used for a loopback test
with Tinytag in top LCM monitoring
continuity as Ohmmeter 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
COND 2
40km
MACC
Pilot card
DSP PC R
380V AC
COND 1
Line Zero meeting, Nov

12. Breaker + MACC Rings, Boxes for Cards, Isothermal Plate
Line Zero meeting, Nov

13. Parsing Conversions for MACC Current Sensors
Line Zero meeting, Nov

14. Line zero component requirements
50 empty OM spheres (drilled for pump down port)
25 OM spheres drilled for pump down and penetrator
(includes LCM OM sphere interlink cable)
Old gel to duplicate full weight of storey (and hold Tinytags)
25 OMFs OM attachments + 25 LCM cylinders 
Full EMC cable set for 1 line (12/04?)
26 Tinytags (leaks LCMs +SPM/SCM),
+ 1 Tinytag (line electrical continuity)
+ 3 Tinytag/OPM combinations (NIKHEF)
Stand-alone DAQ systems Genova)
[sampling rate, parms monitored; %RH, tilt, acceleration, heading]
BSS without SPM/SCM
Empty laser beacon container for Erlangen
2 deadweights
380VAC from JB up EMC via new encapsulated ELCONs
Line Zero meeting, Nov

15. Things/Tests to do
MACC sensitivity to capacitance changes in EMC using DSP
need section of cable
Tinytag input characteristics: suitable as ohm-meter NIKHEF
why not 10kW NTC thermistor input as leak sensor?
Software (Java) /Firmware (Pilot card) changes for reading
of MACC at 2kHz into DSP and Junction box graphical
user interface
Stand-alone fibreoptic attenuation monitor (battery powered
Optical power meter with local memory: NIKHEF)
Stand-alone DAQ systems Genova)
[check-out, sampling rate change battery replacement]
Tests of new encapsulated ELCONs
Line Zero meeting, Nov