1. Student Services Report College Community School Board
April 10, 2017

2. Special Education Stats 2015-2016
Year
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
10/2011
46 Nonresident
173 Resident
Total: 219
49 nonresident
136 Resident
Total: 185
48 nonresident
48 Resident
Total: 96
500
10/2012
40 Nonresident
171 Resident
Total: 211
44 Nonresident
139 Resident
Total: 183
41 Nonresident
45 Resident
Total: 86
480
10/2013
51 Nonresident
192 Resident
Total: 243
33 Nonresident
120 Resident
Total: 153
45 Nonresident
51 Resident
492
10/2014
42 Nonresident
200 Resident
Total: 242
25 Non resident
118 Resident
Total: 143
57 Nonresident
Total: 108
493
10/2015
61 Nonresident
231 Resident
Total: 292
24 Nonresident
117 Resident
Total: 141
37 Nonresident
52 Resident
Total: 89
522
10/2016
56 Nonresident
222 Resident
Total: 278
27 Nonresident
131 Resident
Total: 158
70 Resident
Total: 115
551
These #’s include both resident and non-resident students that we were serving. Information gathered from Grant Wood Weighted Enrollment Detail and Tuition In rosters dated November 18, 2014
10/2015 #’s based on Linda’s rosters from October, 2015
10/2016 #’s based on GWAEA’s Tuition In and Weighted Enrollment Detail Reports

3. Special Education Teachers/Paras Total FTE
Year
Teachers/FTE
Paras FTE
Total # of Students 59
101.06
500 58
104.60
480 61
102.08
492 64
101.94
493
101.75
522
The teachers FTE can be pulled from the year’s rosters or the google doc “SE Teachers List”. The paras FTE is found on the Part C and B Personnel Positions Report.
Under Teachers/FTE don’t count Leah Gass at Edge but count Mary Mcwilliams at PHS.

4. Special Education – Stats 2015-2016
Number of Students Who Were Staffed into Special Education PK K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Total
10-11 35
11-12 55
12-13 48
13-14 29
14-15 50
15- 16 15 58
Download report from GWAEA (include both resident and non-resident students)

5. Special Education – Stats 2015-2016
Number of Students Exited from Special Education Services
: 16
: 22
: 25
: 14
: 27
These are students who staffed out due to successful completion of IEP services. Information taken from SE Roster.

6. Special Ed Mobility Year New Students Drops Four Oaks District
Heart of Iowa
2014/
2015
104 78 2
131 65
2015/
2016
125 66 6
102

7. % Proficient – IEP Green: Increased from previous year Red: Decreased from previous year
Reading-IEP
CCSD
10-11
11-12
12-13
13-14
14-15
15-16
4th
38.90%
42.90%
23.08%
24.56%
22.20%
19.10%
6th
25.00%
25.60%
15.00%
22.13%
32.40%
15.70%
8th
10.30%
28.80%
14.63%
13.43%
22.50%
26.90%
11th
41.30%
45.00%
28.57%
34.69%
41.90%
10.00%
Math-IEP
CCSD 14-15
50.10%
52.40%
35.90%
36.84%
42.20%
31.00%
37.50%
44.20%
27.50%
31.96%
32.00%
26.10%
26.83%
24.62%
57.14%
48.98%
35.50%
26.70%
Revised
See % proficient chart (sub group tab)
New data is from state report card and CCSD pivot table
We know we have gaps, this chart put our data in the context of the state. 7

8. High School Graduation Rate (%) IEP Group Comparison
2012 All
2012 IEP
2013 All
2013 IEP
2014 All
2014 IEP
2015 All
2015 IEP
CCSD
87.63
48.48
92.13
71.88
94.37
79.31
94.6
83.3
Benton
90.58 60
90.48
62.50
90.32 40
97.4
80.0
Cedar Falls
95.87
84.44
96.13
83.64
97.18
80.85
95.8
79.1
Clear Creek
86.49
37.5
86.73
53.85
90.74
88.1
35.3
Cedar Rapids
82.8
62.31
80.92
59.07
85.02
71.72
84.0
72.0
Iowa City
89.03
52.48
87.90
51.69
90.39
63.64
93.2
75.3
Linn Mar
91.67
55.56
89.81
43.86
91.53
54.84
95.2
61.1
Marion
92.7
93.64 85
92.54
97.9
81.3
Muscatine 82
71.11
76.58
55.10
81.79 70
82.9
57.9
Waterloo
74.29
65.77
70.46
51.49
74.18
54.10
80.3
65.0
Waukee
98.01
86.67
98.65
93.55
98.06
92.86
98.4
88.9
Get this report from DE website. A to Z, look for graduation and dropout rate (Bookmarked). There are different reports. Find the one with sub group information.

9. Four Oaks Stats 2015-2016 Regular Education students admitted: 61
Special Education Students admitted: 63
Level 1 – 15
Level 2 – 5
Level
These #’s reflect students who were admitted to Four Oaks after the school year.

10. Four Oaks Stats
Number of Four Oaks students by grade level that have been placed in the district K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 31 16 18
Includes both regular education and special education students

11. Four Oaks Student Placement by Building
Four Oaks Stats
Four Oaks Student Placement by Building
PHS
Point
Creek
Heights
Ridge
View
Crest
Hill
Edge 19 20 5 2 1 76

19. Support for Special Education Teachers: K12 Curriculum Lead/SE Coach
Lindsay Spears
K12 Curriculum Lead/SE Coach

20. K12 Curriculum Lead/SE Coach
Curricular Support
Research/obtain quality intervention materials to ensure:
Alignment to the Iowa Core
Vertical alignment across the district
Professional learning & fidelity of implementation
Plan and facilitate district-wide professional learning:
Differentiated/choice sessions: Accessible Instructional Materials, Executive Functioning, Transition Planning, Literacy, IEP development, Read and Write for Google, Special Education law updates
95% Group (reading intervention materials available to teachers K-12)

21. K12 Curriculum Lead/SE Coach
Coaching Support:
IEP Development (Transition IEP compliance and peer review process)
AT Usability Study (universal design, accessibility for all, selection of services/tools based on data, training provided to teachers and students)
PLC Support (K-12): Coaching teachers’ and teams’ movement through the continuous improvement cycle (using data to make instructional decisions)
Examining effectiveness of service delivery model in closing the achievement gap
Supporting teachers’ ability to diagnose/intervene by providing coaching on diagnostic tools and interpretation of results
Update: decoding vs comprehension at the secondary level → recent data showing growth with these interventions

22. SPEL Special Education Literacy
• Model evidence-based instructional strategies
• Assist teachers in analyzing data
• Coach and collaborate with teachers to determine appropriate instructional strategies and materials

23. Growth Data Buildings Percent Making Growth
GWAEA Goal #2---Increase the percentage of students who perform at the proficient level.
Grant Wood AEA Priority:
The learning gaps between students with IEPs and those without and for those students in disaggregated sub-groups will be reduced.
Growth Data
Buildings
Percent Making Growth
Percent Making Growth to Eliminate the Gap
Crest, Heights, Hill, Ridge and View
100%
25%

24. ECSE Literacy Pilot Data

25. Questions??