1. Txdot’s transportation program, 2018 Txapa annual membership meeting
Bill Hale, P.E., Chief Engineer, TxDOT
January 17, 2018

2. Pavement Condition Trends

3. Percent of Lane Miles by Pavement Type (FY 2018)

4. Condition Score for ACP Pavements

5. Distress Score for ACP Pavements

6. Ride Score for ACP Pavement

7. Preventive Maintenance
Upcoming work for FY 18
Treatment
Lane Miles
Preventive Maintenance
Overlays Less than 2” or
& Seal Coats
29,000
Light Rehab
Overlay Between 2" and 4” or
Mill and Inlay between 2" to 4"
3,000
Medium Rehab
Overlay Between 4" and 6" or
Mill and Inlay between 4" to 6"
2,000
Heavy Rehabilitation
Full Reconstruction or
Mill and inlays Greater than 6”
1,000

8. TxDOT Organizational Chart

9. Proposed Program Funding Targets for December Update of 2018 UTP
Category Allocations
Proposed 10-YR Distribution
Category 1- Maintenance
$ ,942,960,000
Category 2 -Metro and Urban Corridor Funding
$ ,152,110,000
Category 4 - Connectivity (Regional)
$ ,342,870,000
Category 4 - Connectivity (Congestion)
$ ,082,460,000
Category 5 - CMAQ (3 MPOs)
$ ,182,990,000
Category 6 - Bridge
$ ,406,350,000
Category 7 - Fed STP-MM (Large MPO)
$ ,335,730,000
Category 8 - Safety
$ ,313,920,000
Category 9 - TAP
$ ,800,000
Category 10 - Supplemental Transportation Projects
$ ,930,000
Category 11 - District Discretionary
$ ,072,530,000
Category 11 - Energy Sector
$ ,110,420,000
Category 12-Strategic Priority
$ ,052,680,000
Category 12-Strategic Priority (TexasClearLanes)
$ ,947,140,000
Total Allocated Funds
$ ,440,890,000
Non-traditional funds-not in base (Cat 3 and Fed Earmarks)
$ ,172,990,000
Total, All Funds
$ ,613,880,000
In the August adoption of the 2018 UTP, the planning scenario used did not incorporate the recent legislative requirement to address debt service repayment for Proposition 12 Bonds using Proposition 7 funds. The December update incorporates this reduction, 613.4M, applied proportionately against all categories not legislatively mandated.

10. Area Engineering Portfolio
Built bottom up by project and a clear geographic link to Area Office, District and the State Portfolio
ILLUSTRATIVE
100
CSJs
$525M
Area Engineering Portfolio
700
CSJs
$20,000M
District Portfolio
7,500
CSJs
$75,000M
State Portfolio
Project Manager Portfolio
No. projects1 10
CSJs
Volume1
$300M
Data source:
District Master portfolio (updated by DCIS):
Authorized amount
Let Amount (equals Low Bid if let, or Est. Const. Cost if not let)
Let Sch Stat
Combined let year
Logic: Programming level = summation of Let Amount or Authorized Amount of projects not yet let, excluding Let Sch Stat = “NC”, “FC” and “LX”
CSJs reprogrammed – from district model, entered into sandbox by districts
1 Excludes Candidate PA projects and projects in construction
Source: Source Dallas Integrated Portfolio, Central Integrated Portfolio 2/16/2015

11. Built bottom up from Districts to Entire State
Rural District
Statewide
Urban District
Metro District

12. UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM
PLANNED FUNDING – GOAL
Gas Tax, Prop 1, Prop 7, FAST ACT, Ending Diversions, etc.
$ 70 Billion/10year = $7 Billion/year
Design-Bid-Build (DBB):
$55 to $60Billion /10years
$5.5 to $6.0 Billion/year (Average)
$460 Million/month to $500 Million/month
Small (<$15Million) (80% total number of projects)
Medium ($15Million to $50Million) (17% total number of projects)
Large (>$50Million) (3% total number of projects)
Design-Build (DB):
$10 to $15 Billion/years
$1.0 to $1.5 Billion/year (Average)
3 per year ( Minimum of $150Million/project)

15. Questions?