1. By Peters, et al TYSON METCALF ECON 5430
Measuring a Fair and Ambitious Climate Agreement Using Cumulative Emissions
By Peters, et al
TYSON METCALF ECON 5430

2. Global Emissions Crisis
There exists a near-linear relationship between increases in global average temperature and cumulative carbon dioxide emissions (IPCC 2013)
Policy makers have called for a “fair and ambitious” global climate agreement
Scientific constraints: allowable carbon emissions to avoid exceeding a 2 degree C global warming limit
The Problem?
Current countries not valuing meeting mitigation challenges over nation’s agendas

3. CO2 Emissions: Outlook “The global challenge is immense, requiring a technology revolution (Hoffertetal1998, Galianaand Green 2009) and a complete decarbonization of the global economy by the second half of this century.” The EU, USA, and China, for example, commit to less of a CO2 emissions target, even though these nations account for most of the world’s emissions The Issue: US, EU and China are responsible for most of CO2 emissions and must enact change to face this challenge

4. Measuring Fairness
Peters explains, “We find that, combined, the EU, US, and Chinese pledges leave little room for other countries to emit CO2 if a 2 degree limit is the objective
Essentially requiring all other countries to move towards per capita emissions 7 to 14 times lower than these three nations by 2030

5. INDCs: World Reconciliation Conference
The Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) held a meeting in Paris, France (December 2015) met in order to achieve “stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate systems”
However, although this meeting sought a fair and ambitious reconciliation of the matter, there is no unique way to agree on the implementation of these strategies
Ways of measuring carbon emissions:
1.) Sharing of emissions based on current population (equity)
2.) Sharing based on current national fractions of global emissions (inertia)

6. Measuring Carbon Emissions
This is beneficial because the cumulative emissions concept make the task of sharing emissions significantly more tractable (WBGU 2009)
The problem? It does not explicitly consider non-CO2 gases at the country level, complicating its application in climate policy
The US, EU and China have already submitted their INDC’s and plans to reduce carbon emission levels by 2050
Goal: to reduce emissions levels and to stay below a 2 degree increase in global average temperature. This initiative has been accepted by a broad range of countries.

7. Allowable Emissions Test
An “Allowable Emissions Test” is conducted taking into account all CO2 and non-CO2 gases, historical emissions, and current emissions to come up with a current allowable emissions
EQUATION:
Cumulative total allowance - CO2 gas – non CO2 gas – historical emissions = Current Allowable Emissions
How will nations share the allowable global carbon emissions?

8. Possible Solutions Possible solutions include:
Ratio of global quota based on population
Ratio of global quota based on current shares of global emissions
Best Solution?
A mixture of the two
A greater focus on technology and political common ground in global emission matters

10. Takeaway From the Article: 1) technology and 2) geopolitical pledges
“Our analysis suggests that a critical ingredient that is missing from current negotiations is the need for a greatly increased focus on advancing research and development on low-, zero- and negative-carbon energy sources (Barrett 2009)”
“Pledges by those countries and others toward research and development (R&D) efforts would be a unique long-term contribution to global climate goals.”