Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKirk Keithley Modified over 10 years ago
1
Stabilisation of GHG concentrations in the atmosphere Findings of the IPCC Bert Metz co-chairman IPCC Working Group III INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC)
2
Warning These are findings from TAR and SRCCS AR4 findings may be different AR4 approval/ acceptance dates: –January 29- February 1, 2007: WG I –April 2-5, 2007: WG II –April 30- May 3, 2007: WG III IPCC
3
Article 2 of the UNFCCC “… stabilization of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system..” IPCC
4
Climate change risks and global mean temperature Global mean teamp above 1990 Risks of large scale non- linearities Risks of Aggregate impacts Risks of regional impacts Risks of extreme weather events Risks to unique and threatened ecosystems Global mean teamp above 1990 IPCC
5
source: IPCC TAR Synthesis Report, 2001 Global mean temperature and stabilisation level IPCC
6
AR4: look for latest assessment of climate sensitivity >> relationship between GHG concentrations and global mean temperature climate change risks IPCC
7
To stabilise concentrations in the atmosphere emissions have to go down to very low levels IPCC
9
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 1990 2000201020202030204020502060207020802090 2100 IPCC SRES A2 Scenario ref 550 750 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 199020002010202020302040205020602070208020902100 IPCC SRES A1B Scenario 450 450 550 550 650 Global Anthropogenic Carboon Dioxide Emissions (GtC) ref 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 1990 2000201020202030204020502060207020802090 2100 IPCC SRES B1 Scenario 450 550 ref 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 199020002010202020302040205020602070208020902100 IPCC SRES A1T Scenario ref 450 550 650 650 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 1990 2000201020202030204020502060207020802090 2100 IPCC SRES B2 Scenario 450 450 550 550 650 650 ref 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 199020002010202020302040205020602070208020902100 IPCC SRES A1FI Scenario 450 550 650 750 ref The stabilisation challenge depends on the reference scenario and the stabilisation level IPCC
10
Emission reductions required for different stabilisation levels
11
IPCC
12
Emission reductions required for different stabilisation levels
13
Emission reductions by whom? All stabilisation studies ( except B1 baseline) assume that industrialised countries reduce their GHG emissions first Emissions from all regions diverge from baselines at some point B1 baseline: emission reductions through sustainable development policies
14
Illustrative example of mitigation options contributing to stabilisation SRCCS, fig TS12 IPCC
16
Costs of stabilisation go up with lower stabilisation levels CO 2 only IPCC
17
Projected mitigation costs are sensitive to the assumed emissions baseline Costs for some countries/regions/time periods may be (much) higher IPCC
18
Decision making Step-by-step process towards stabilisation Balancing risks of insufficient or excessive action Portfolio of implementing mitigation and adaptation options, policy instruments and further technology development and diffusion Equity and efficiency are critical elements of international regimes Integrate climate change mitigation and adaptation into sustainable development policies IPCC
19
AR4: look for latest assessment of Multigas stabilisation studies (CO2 and other GHGs) Stabilisation studies with more mitigation options Stabilisation studies for lower stabilisation levels than in TAR New estimates of costs of stabilisation (in relation to costs of inaction) and distribution of costs depending on international regime modes Relation between sustainable development and climate change impacts, adaptation and mitigation IPCC
20
Climate change is not just an environmental issue, but a development issue IPCC
23
The long term picture Technical potential of known technologies adequate for 450 ppm stabilisation or lower; broad package needed Lifestyle/ behaviour change would help, but not essential Mitigation costs (NOT counting avoided climate change damages and co-benefits) depend on baseline and stabilisation levels Learning makes new technologies attractive over time Associated socio-economic and institutional changes important Technology transfer crucial IPCC
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.