CAUCUSES AND PRIMARIES

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CAUCUSES AND PRIMARIES"— Presentation transcript:

1 CAUCUSES AND PRIMARIES

2 Background McGovern-Fraser Commission
Response to a tumultuous 1968 DNC Demands for better representation average citizens could be delegates

3 Primaries & Caucuses Primary Caucus Increased use in last 30 years
Voters vote for candidates and state parties select delegates to attend Nat’l Convention Run by STATE Local precinct caucus  county convention  state convention  nat’l convention Each level selects delegates to attend higher level Run by PARTY

4 Types of Primaries Closed Open Blanket Format used in most states
Independents may vote Pretty much anything goes! Only registered party members can vote for partisan offices Ballot of any one party the voter wants Independents can vote Crossing party lines allowed Voters can “mix and match”/split-ticket No crossing party lines! Trend is favoring open primaries Danger of “raid”

5 Iowa Caucuses First test of a candidates-vote getting ability
Media frenzy! Narrows the field of viable candidates Momentum! Iowa Caucus explained Inside the caucus

6

7

8 What do we have in Washington?
For state elections (and most other positions): Top 2 primary Voters don’t have to declare party affiliation (open) System was changed by initiative passed in 2004, upheld by SCOTUS For Presidential election: Closed primary + caucusing (D) Closed primary (R)

9

10 “Frontloading” States move up their primaries to capitalize on the media attention Delegates choose candidates within weeks of the Iowa caucus and NH primary Potential problems: Rush to judgement Late primaries are irrelevant

11

12

13 Evaluating the system Disproportionate attention goes to early states
Prominent politicians find it difficult to take time out to run Money plays too big a role Participation in primaries and caucuses is low and unrepresentative Too much power to the media: HORSERACE!

14 Turn and talk Are there any solutions to the problems presented by the primary system? Does it need to be reformed?

15 PATH TO THE PRESIDENCY

16

17 National Convention Selection of presidential nominee
Nominee is candidate that wins a majority of party delegates Mere formality More about the image

18

19 National Convention Selection of vice president
Chosen by nominee and “stamped” by convention “Balancing the ticket”

20 National Convention Development of party platform
Reconciliation & unification

21 Analysis of nominating system
PRO CON Highly participatory (or at least lots of opportunity) Highly representative Testing ground for candidates Low rates of turnout Too lengthy Does not test qualities needed to be President Too much of a media game Frontloading Voters in primaries tend to be better educated & more affluent then general election Delegates are unrepresentative

22 After the nomination… Fall campaigning Election Day
Meeting of the Electors Formal election Inauguration Day

23 Voter Turnout & Voting Behavior

24 Factors Affecting Voting Behavior
What do we already know about who votes? Who votes for which party? Predict: What the number one predictor of whether someone votes or not?

25 Factors Affecting Voting Behavior
Geography Solid South Great Plains Rocky Mtn. region New England Great Lakes region Far West

26 Factors Affecting Voting Behavior
Presence of a strong candidate Time—maintaining, deviating, critical, midterm Party identification Demographic factors—sex, race, socioeconomic status, religion Issues Candidate appeal

27

28

29 Does low voter turnout matter?

30 Voter Turnout Current qualifications Citizenship Residency Age
Historical qualifications for suffrage Current qualifications Religion (state leg) Property (state leg) Race (15th Amendment) Sex (19th Amendment) Income (24th Amendment—poll tax) Literacy (Voting Rights Act of 1965) Minimum age of 21 (26th Amendment) Citizenship Residency Age Registration (in all states except ND) And other state to state laws…

31 Voter turnout in the U.S. About 50-60% in presidential elections
30%-40% in midterm congressional elections Even lower in state/local elections Steady decline since 1960 How does this compare to other industrialized nations? As high as 90% Multi-party systems Automatic or same-day registration Compulsion penalties

32 Recent Turnout 2016: 139 million votes 2012: 130 million votes cast
60.2% of eligible voters 2012: 130 million votes cast 58.6% of eligible voters 2008: 132 million votes cast 62.2% of eligible voters

33

34 Reasons for low voter turnout
Institutional barriers Registration Easing or eliminating would add about 9% Motor Voter Act (1993) Ballot fatigue Excessive number of elections & offices Type of election Difficulties obtaining absentee ballots Young vote Political reasons And…why do we vote on a Tuesday?!?

35

36 PATH TO THE PRESIDENCY Electoral College

37

38

39 Rationale Poor communication—common people would lack essential information Desire to have the “best” people to select president Compromise between direct election and Congress selection

40 Allotment of Electoral Votes
Each state has as many electoral votes as it has members in Congress Minimum—3 votes Total 538 votes (3 votes to DC) California has highest number—55

41

42 Selection of Electors Each party develops a “slate” of electors prior to election

43 Winning Electoral Votes
Candidate with most popular votes (plurality) wins all the state’s electoral votes (winner-take-all) Concentration of campaigning in large, competitive states (battleground/swing states) Electors meet in December to cast ballots

44 Winning the Election Majority of electoral votes 270 to win
If no candidate has the majority House selects from top 3 candidates Each state has one vote Senate selects vice pres. from top 2 candidates

45 Criticisms President can be elected with a plurality, not a majority, of popular votes Possibility of minority president 1824, 1876, 1888, 2000, 2016 “Faithless electors”—no law that requires electors to vote the way they are supposed to Small states are proportionately overrepresented And WAY overrepresented if decision goes to the House Inhibits development of third parties (Clip)

46 Alternatives Direct election—one person, one vote
District system (Maine & Nebraska) Proportional system—candidate gets same % of electoral votes as popular vote Keep electoral votes, but abolish electors

47 So why hasn’t the EC been abolished?
Tradition! Difficulties in amending the Constitution Opposition from overrepresented small states

48 CAMPAIGN FINANCE

49 Federal Election Campaign Act
Passed in 1974, post-Watergate Established Federal Elections Commission (F.E.C.) Bipartisan (3 R’s, 3 D’s) All candidates must disclose contributions & expenditures First limits on individual contributions Regulations on political action committees (PAC’s) Candidates can receive federal subsidies but are subject to spending limits

50 Hard $ vs. Soft $ Hard money = Federal (regulated) money
$ contributed directly to a candidate of a political party Soft money = Non-federal money $ to parties for “party building” activities

51 Contributions & Expenditures

52 Campaign Contributions
Donations made directly to a candidate or campaign Individuals can donate: $2,500 to a candidate $5,000 to a PAC PACs can donate: $5,000 to a candidate $15,000 to a party All disclosed to the F.E.C

53 Independent Expenditures
Expenses made on behalf of a “political message” but not directly coordinated with a campaign

54 527 groups Non-profit, tax-exempt
Can not make a clear political endorsement Swift Boat Veterans for Truth: Remember the Mankha Dhingra ads? Republican State Leadership Committee  Unlimited contributions Disclosed to IRS

55 501(c) groups & Super PAC’s
Unlimited contributions Donors undisclosed Cannot spend more than half their funds on political activities Unlimited contributions Can advocate for a specific candidate but can’t be coordinated Donations are disclosed to F.E.C.

56 Key Laws & Cases

57 Buckley v. Valeo, 1976 CONSTITUTIONAL to limit amount of money individuals or PACs can donate to party or candidate Struck down portions of FECA that limited the amount individuals could contribute to their own campaign Ross Perot—60 million of his own $ Mitt Romney—44 million Donald Trump—60 million

58 McCain-Feingold Act Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act of 2002
Attempt to limit large soft money donations Upheld by McConnell v. FEC

59 Citizens United v. FEC, 2010 Citizens United sued for an unconstitutional restriction of free speech. Overturned parts of McCain-Feingold Court sided with Citizens United Money is a form of speech Corporations are afforded same free speech as individuals Corporation/unions can donate unlimited amounts of $ to groups that make independent expenditures

60 Warm Up I am a non-profit, tax-exempt group with no limits on contributions. Only half of my “mission” can be focused on campaigning. All my donors are anonymous/undisclosed. I am a 501(c) group

61 I am an interest group that pools money from various sources and then donates it to candidates and political parties. Donors can give me up to $5,000 per year, and then I can give up to $5,000 to a candidate per election year. I am regulated by the FEC. I am a PAC

62 I am fairly new in the world of politics and very influential
I am fairly new in the world of politics and very influential. I can advocate for a specific candidate but not give money directly to them. There are no limits on who can contribute and how much they can contribute. I am regulated by the FEC. I am a Super PAC

63 I am a non-profit, tax-exempt group with no limits on contributions
I am a non-profit, tax-exempt group with no limits on contributions. I cannot expressly advocate for/against a specific candidate or give money to a political party. My donors will eventually be disclosed to the I.R.SFEC. I am a 527 group

64 The Cost of Campaigns

65 Discuss

66 Do we need to reform our campaign finance system?
Split in two groups (Team A and Team B) 5 min. to compile the strongest arguments for your side 3 min. to argue your side as a group After both sides have stated their case, you can step out of your assigned position and discuss more openly Team A: In favor of campaign finance reform Team B: Opposed to campaign finance reform

67 Do we need to reform our campaign finance system?
Discuss Do we need to reform our campaign finance system? Extension Q’s— What should be the most pressing reform? Should Citizens United v. FEC be overturned? Who benefits most from our current system? Who does it hurt most?

68 4 at a time discussion 5 chairs, never more than 4 people up front
Do we need to reform the campaign finance system? What would be the most pressing reform? Should Citizens United v. FEC be overturned? Who benefits most from our current system? Who does it hurt most?


Download ppt "CAUCUSES AND PRIMARIES"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google